Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsThe University of South Carolina has name its new mascot, and it's deeply problematic.
It's named its gamecock rooster after General Thomas Sumter, a Revolutionary War hero, but Sumter was also known for something else.
This dissertation examines the entrenchment of slavery in the South Carolina backcountry during the era of the American Revolution by focusing on events surrounding Thomas Sumter's Law, a recruiting plan that offered slaves and other Loyalist property, taken by the troops during the campaign, as an enlistment bounty granted to men willing to serve for a period of ten months in the state forces beginning in April, 1781. The idea of offering a slave bounty succeeded as a lure for Revolutionary Era backcountry yeomen. The vast majority of privates recruited by Sumter showed no prior long term service, and individuals traveled from North Carolina and even Virginia to enlist for ten months in the South Carolina State Troops. Thomas Sumter successfully raised a sizable brigade of State Troops by appealing to self interest, but drew these men into a war created and sustained in large part by political and military elite whose stated beliefs in the importance of disinterested public virtue placed Sumter in a precarious position between the ideologically motivated leadership of the rebellion and back country men who manifested a disinterest in such ideology. Although Revolutionary leaders initially approved the slave bounty plan, once they observed that the actions of the State Troops amounted to a serious threat to private property and a catalyst in the increasingly violent civil war their tacit approval devolved into open contempt, and various efforts to contain the perceived radicalism of the plan. Sumter then worked assiduously in the post war period to reshape the memory of the war in his favor, in large part to further his political aspirations.
This paper has been withdrawn.
This paper has been withdrawn.
https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/2021/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
3 replies, 1251 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (8)
ReplyReply to this post
3 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
The University of South Carolina has name its new mascot, and it's deeply problematic. (Original Post)
Ex Lurker
Aug 2022
OP
elleng
(130,956 posts)1. Anyone surprised?
'Lindsey' better???
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)2. He wasn't born in South Carolina, but he grew up there
Name the chicken Stephen Colbert.
stopdiggin
(11,314 posts)3. perhaps having your mascot named
after an animal specifically raised for participation in illegal blood sports - wasn't quite 'salty' enough to get the point across?