Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWhy not indict Kushner and other enablers first, get their information on record,
and then indict Trump for the Presidential Records Act?
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 608 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Why not indict Kushner and other enablers first, get their information on record, (Original Post)
no_hypocrisy
Aug 2022
OP
2naSalit
(86,824 posts)1. I'm hoping that...
They whole upper tier of the gang will be rounded up on the same day like dragnet for a violent mob-style organization.
onenote
(42,779 posts)2. Exactly what crime would Kushner be indicted for?
no_hypocrisy
(46,231 posts)4. Aiding and abetting
onenote
(42,779 posts)5. If you don't have enough to indict Trump now, how can you indict someone for aiding and abetting
It is easier to convict someone of committing a crime than to convict someone of aiding and abetting the commission of that crime.
Tickle
(2,555 posts)6. I think the poster
is figuring he would tell on daddy in law
brooklynite
(94,785 posts)8. He might - IF INVOLVED - but again you need evidence to indict him.
no_hypocrisy
(46,231 posts)9. Adding conspiracy
Facilitation at the least
MissMillie
(38,587 posts)3. I could be wrong about this, but
handing out indictments might begin the "discovery" process, which may reveal the DOJ's case against the ringleader.
Emile
(22,997 posts)7. Judgement Day is closing in on all of them.
Tickle
(2,555 posts)10. If they were going to arrest orange slob
they would have after going through the stuff he stole. Please someone tell me I'm wrong because I want to be