General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forumstiedrich: "Hillary Clinton mishandled three emails and you people demanded she be sent to Gitmo, so
Hillary Clinton mishandled three emails and you people demanded she be sent to Gitmo, so sit the fuck down and shut the fuck up and stop trying to defend Donald Trump's treason, you're beclowning yourselves
Link to tweet
TheRealNorth
(9,500 posts)pnwmom
(108,991 posts)on the documents.
They were no longer classified, so the heading had been removed, but not the C's.
SunSeeker
(51,677 posts)IjustDontlikeRepugs
(636 posts)orleans
(34,073 posts)Bo Zarts
(25,400 posts)STFD&STFU
calimary
(81,451 posts)I was gonna say something like if Hillary did this, youd be screaming for her execution but heres the full-on truth: Hillary would never be this flagrant and this criminal a repeat offender as the donald is. And he reminds us anew, on an almost hourly basis.
SunSeeker
(51,677 posts)She got the idea for a private server from Colin Powell, the outgoing Secretary of State under Dubya, who advised her to do so, like he did. Her private server was never hacked. The State Department's was. Any emails were safer in her server.
FakeNoose
(32,740 posts)Jeff Tiedrich tells off the Repukes with so much authority that he should be teaching 4th-graders.
The wise-ass and snarkiest 4th graders.
orleans
(34,073 posts)jerseyjim
(129 posts)I don't believe that tRump was the legitimate president. He stole that election and then spent his entire phony term gaslighting.
Marcuse
(7,506 posts)forgotmylogin
(7,530 posts)It sounds like they gave Trump every opportunity to go "whoops, my bad" and return the documents without it being a mess.
Hillary cooperated and wasn't intentionally mishandling the documents. There were minor mistakes, but it was cleared without national incident. Trump had the same affordance offered to him to handle it quietly.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,530 posts)Clinton had three emails that were not marked classified and were later deemed classified without her knowledge. There was no gross negligence or other conduct that was remotely criminal
Link to tweet
https://abcnews.go.com/US/fbis-trump-investigation-hillary-clinton-email-probe-heres/story?id=89069046&cid=social_twitter_abcn
"James Comey read off a list of all ... Hillary Clinton's crimes, only to say that no reasonable prosecutor would prosecute," Trump said of the former FBI director in a social media post this past weekend.
But a review of government documents from both investigations suggests there are key differences between the evidence uncovered in Clinton's case and the evidence already publicly documented in the Trump investigation.......
To charge any of them with violating 793(e), prosecutors would have had to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Clinton or her aides acted "willfully" and "with the intent to do something the law forbids," the Justice Department's inspector general said in its report on the case.
Prosecutors determined that the evidence and facts of Clinton's case showed "a lack of intent to communicate classified information on unclassified systems," especially since "[n]one of the emails Clinton received were properly marked to inform her of the classified status of the information," and investigators found evidence that Clinton and her aides "worded emails carefully in an attempt to 'talk around' classified information," according to the inspector general's report.
"There was no evidence that the senders or former Secretary Clinton believed or were aware at the time that the emails contained classified information," prosecutors concluded, according to the inspector general......
Witnesses in the Clinton case told investigators they "expected that any emails sent to a state.gov address would be preserved" -- and many of those emails were acquired from other devices -- so "there was no evidence that Clinton or anyone else" intended to conceal, remove or destroy the emails from government systems, the inspector general said.
In addition, federal prosecutors concluded that, unlike the electronic communications underpinning Clinton's case, "every prosecution under Section 2071 has involved" the "physical removal" or destruction of a document, the inspector general said.
There is no real comparison between the Clinton and TFG cases