Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsA federal judge just ordered that no, Steve Bannon will not get a new trial.
U.S. District Judge Carl J. Nichols says it was fine that Jan. 6 Committee members didn't testify.
Link to tweet
?s=20&t=Tg7O6yaYGRERgoEUCmN36Q
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
13 replies, 1177 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (20)
ReplyReply to this post
13 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A federal judge just ordered that no, Steve Bannon will not get a new trial. (Original Post)
kpete
Sep 2022
OP
Mueller She Wrote Has A Hilarious Twitter Assessment of the Court Documents
FelineOverlord
Sep 2022
#10
Maybe Bannon should argue the court is violating his 25th amendment rights.
Hermit-The-Prog
Sep 2022
#12
onethatcares
(16,188 posts)1. that made my day
any time that asshole gets a sad, I laugh out loud.
Thank you United States District Judge Nichols.
lindysalsagal
(20,733 posts)2. Anyone know what this means? Why would the 1/6 members testify?
I'm clueless.
drray23
(7,637 posts)6. Bannon's stupid argument was that since they were asking him to testify
he had a right to face his accusers and therefore wanted them to be at a trial where they could be cross-examined for why they issued the subponea.
lindysalsagal
(20,733 posts)7. The egos on these criminals.
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,619 posts)3. This makes me smile
kpete
(72,022 posts)4. Thanks for that tweet
it answers a lot of questions
kp
gab13by13
(21,408 posts)5. Wasn't judge Cannon available?
Very good!
UTUSN
(70,744 posts)9. K&R for, hear hear!
FelineOverlord
(3,595 posts)10. Mueller She Wrote Has A Hilarious Twitter Assessment of the Court Documents
With lots of paraphrasing
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,447 posts)12. Maybe Bannon should argue the court is violating his 25th amendment rights.
Emile
(22,949 posts)11. What is his sentence?
Volaris
(10,274 posts)13. Max 1 year for each of 2 counts (iirc)?
I'm betting he gets a fine and 30 days per, so he ends up with 2 months in county lockup.
Not fun, but not existential if you don't otherwise have a job to go to...