General Discussion

Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin

(107,996 posts) Sun Sep 4, 2022, 03:51 PM Sep 2022

Trump suggests the Mar-a-Lago documents were bound for his library

https://www.yahoo.com/news/trump-suggests-mar-lago-documents-110000787.html

Euphemism for the crapper.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Trump suggests the Mar-a-Lago documents were bound for his library (Original Post) Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin Sep 2022 OP

Still not legal. kentuck Sep 2022 #1

Oh that, well I was going to turn those (*) over to the cops tomorrow underpants Sep 2022 #5

Gets his name into the media empedocles Sep 2022 #2

This message was self-deleted by its author Baked Potato Sep 2022 #3

Ok. So he just admitted, again, that he stole these docs. madinmaryland Sep 2022 #4

Until then, they are supposed to be in the possession of the national archives. Ms. Toad Sep 2022 #6

kentuck

(111,098 posts)

1. Still not legal.

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Sun Sep 4, 2022, 03:53 PM

Sep 2022

Although he is lying thru his teeth.

underpants

(182,813 posts)

5. Oh that, well I was going to turn those (*) over to the cops tomorrow

Reply to kentuck (Reply #1)

Sun Sep 4, 2022, 04:00 PM

Sep 2022

* anything illegally POSSESSED

empedocles

(15,751 posts)

2. Gets his name into the media

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Sun Sep 4, 2022, 03:54 PM

Sep 2022

Response to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Baked Potato This message was self-deleted by its author.

madinmaryland

(64,933 posts)

4. Ok. So he just admitted, again, that he stole these docs.

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Sun Sep 4, 2022, 03:55 PM

Sep 2022

LOCK HIM UP!

Ms. Toad

(34,073 posts)

6. Until then, they are supposed to be in the possession of the national archives.

Reply to Yo_Mama_Been_Loggin (Original post)

Sun Sep 4, 2022, 04:18 PM

Sep 2022

Since he obviously knows about the Obama records (in possession of the National Archives in Chicago), he has no excuse for not knowing anything about the process.

Reply to this discussion