Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
13 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

MerryHolidays

(7,715 posts)
1. On questions of paramount national importance, they can appeal directly to SCOTUS
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 11:17 PM
Sep 2022

or at least request to do so.

This is what happened in US v. Nixon. District Court Judge John Sirica ruled that Nixon had to turn over tapes to Special Prosecutor Leom Jaworski. Even though the Special Prosecutor won the case, he appealed it directly SCOTUS given it's critical importance to ongoing criminal trial. It was huge gamble, but SCOTUS was fed up with Nixon.

While SCOTUS is not the same, I cannot imagine that anyone (except Clarence "Ginny" Thomas) on SCOTUS wants to help this buffoon.

MerryHolidays

(7,715 posts)
9. And it's the same SCOTUS that would hear issues arising out of the search
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 11:53 PM
Sep 2022

Other than Clarence Thomas, as you pointed out, it was 8-1 against Trump (and Clarence "Ginny" Thomas should have recused himself, which William Rehnquist did in US v. Nixon.

I cannot imaging that these same 8 justices want to keep this fool around. They owe him absolutely nothing. Yes, Dobbs sucks, but that's a very different issue than supporting Donald Trump.

crickets

(25,980 posts)
11. 👆👆
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 12:02 AM
Sep 2022

Clarence Thomas is not to be trusted at all for any ruling, but the full court has more sense on this particular issue. National security breaches this grave are taken seriously, even by the nuttiest handmaiden jackasses among them. Definitely it would be better to roll with SCOTUS as a whole rather than trying to appeal in the 11th District with Thomas.

MerryHolidays

(7,715 posts)
12. The problem is the one onenote pointed out
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 12:07 AM
Sep 2022

To bypass the 11th Circuit and go to SCOTUS, the case has to be before the CoA to begin with. The fact pattern worked in the Nixon case, but I don't think it works here. Trump is not going to appeal Cannon's ruling. The DoJ has to do that, and they have to do it to the 11th Cir.

crickets

(25,980 posts)
13. Drat, I misread before.
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 12:38 AM
Sep 2022

There's no time for this foot-dragging crap. I hope DOJ has a plan or we're all toast.

onenote

(42,704 posts)
6. SCOTUS Rule 11 spells out the procedure
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 11:38 PM
Sep 2022

Last edited Wed Sep 7, 2022, 02:33 PM - Edit history (1)

Rule 11:

A petition for a writ of certiorari to review a case pending in a United States court of appeals, before judgment is entered in that court, will be granted only upon a showing that the case is of such imperative public importance as to justify deviation from normal appellate practice and to require immediate determination in this Court. See 28 U. S. C. § 2101(e).

In Nixon v US, Nixon appealed the district court's denial of Nixon's motion to quash a subpoena to the Court of Appeals. The government filed a petition for certiorari before judgment, and then Nixon filed a cross-petition for certiorari before judgment.

MerryHolidays

(7,715 posts)
8. You are absolutely right. The case has to get to the CoA to begin with
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 11:49 PM
Sep 2022

That's why there were cross-petitions at SCOTUS in US v. Nixon.

Nixon lost before Judge Sirica, and he appealed to the DC CoA. Here, the DoJ "lost" before Cannon, and Trump is clearly not going to appeal. So, is it the case that the 11 Circuit is as good as gets for DoJ?

Sincere thank you for your detailed answer on Rule 11!

GregariousGroundhog

(7,523 posts)
7. Clarence Thomas is assigned to review emergency petitions from the 11th circuit
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 11:43 PM
Sep 2022

The 11th circuit includes Florida, and Clarence Thomas is the one who is assigned to review emergency petitions from that particular circuit.

MerryHolidays

(7,715 posts)
10. Not an expert on this, but I think this is literally on emergency petitions only
Wed Sep 7, 2022, 12:00 AM
Sep 2022

For example, where a stay in a death penalty case is requested on an emergency basis. That would go to the justice in charge of that CoA, but the entire SCOTUS can, effectively, overrule that justice.

Boy, Trump is no fool. He moved from NY to FL, packed the FL courts with his people and the same with the 11th CoA, and Clarence "Ginny" Thomas hears emergency petitions from the 11th CoA. He is a monster, but he knows EXACTLY what he is doing folks.

mucifer

(23,545 posts)
2. My question is does President Biden now not have
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 11:19 PM
Sep 2022

Access to the information in the documents or is all this info trump took now gone?

Are their copies that The government has?

Fiendish Thingy

(15,619 posts)
4. I think you mean get the injunction removed
Tue Sep 6, 2022, 11:20 PM
Sep 2022

A stay would suspend the judge’s ruling and injunction, which would be a good thing.

I will be surprised if DOJ doesn’t appeal and seek a stay.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Question about DOJ