General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsBernie Sanders says he'll vote against keeping the government open if Manchin's 'disastrous side-dea
side-deal on energy is includedSen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont said on Thursday that he'd oppose a short-term government funding bill if Democratic leaders attached legislation meant to ease construction of crude oil pipelines and other energy infrastructure.
"I will not vote for any bill that makes it easier for Big Oil to destroy the planet and that includes approving the Mountain Valley Pipeline," the Vermont independent wrote on Twitter. "The Continuing Resolution must not be held hostage by Big Oil."
The continuing resolution is a bill designed to keep the government funded for several weeks while Democrats and Republicans craft a year-long spending bill. The measure includes permitting reforms meant to speed up the approval of energy infrastructure projects including the Mountain Valley Pipeline in Sen. Joe Manchin's home state of West Virginia.
Sanders took to the Senate floor and pummeled the legislation, which Democratic leaders and President Joe Biden agreed to pass in an effort to secure Manchin's vote for the Inflation Reduction Act last month. Winning Manchin's support was crucial for the party to advance the slimmed-down version of Biden's economic agenda.
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/bernie-sanders-says-he-ll-vote-against-keeping-the-government-open-if-manchin-s-disastrous-side-deal-on-energy-is-included/ar-AA11BNCR
Sure that's the hill you want to die on Bernie? I don't like Manchin's deal either but I don't know if you're going to get a better one.
Faux pas
(14,681 posts)RainCaster
(10,884 posts)I'm with you all the way!
Autumn
(45,107 posts)Celerity
(43,416 posts)that rotten pipeline, and works to dramatically undermine the IRA climate parts that are now already signed into law (Manchin and Big Fossil Fuel are trying to retroactively damage Biden's IRA to a large degree because they cannot undo the just passed law).
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100217137350#post9
Autumn
(45,107 posts)give Manchin a million excuses and kudos for every Dem bill he sabotages.
PuraVidaDreamin
(4,101 posts)The time is now!
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)If that. Is this one of a series?
Celerity
(43,416 posts)The IRA of 2022 is already signed into law, Manchin cannot stop that, but his side deal undercuts it it ex post facto.
see:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100217137350#post9
womanofthehills
(8,718 posts)600 water ways need to be crossed - less than 60% finished
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Last edited Fri Sep 9, 2022, 03:55 AM - Edit history (1)
how we want to supply energy in future, but it's almost done, an imperfect asset we can put to work as we turn to meeting many, many, MANY other, vital energy issues. The balance of costs and benefits strongly favors using it to help maintain life-sustaining energy for real people while we take dirty (dirtier in this case) energy away. None of this is about profits for those building it.
Absolutely everything depends on adequate energy for existence, and demand is increasing due to climate emergencies and population growth -- in spite of use becoming more efficient. Society must maintain adequate energy supplies WHILE we transition to sustainable sources and away from fossil fuels.
Where supplies are not adequate, there will be no transition. Society won't allow -- except where people are too poor and few to save themselves and their communities, of course.
We're already seeing warning signs around the nation of system failures for various reasons. There is little mention of the relatively few human deaths so far, or of already dying communities, but they're actually giant, blazing danger signals.
We have to be smarter than we have been about a lot of things to bring ourselves through this. Our safety margins for foolish mistakes are gone. And we really need to listen to and empower good leaders; those prone to well meaning but fruitless thinking are as problematic as those prone to cupidity and factional knuckledragging now that we must meet many emergencies for real.
So finish the almost-finished pipeline that's already torn through 300 miles of mostly wilderness forest and farmland because it's almost finished and can be used. Insist it be done right. Monitor properly, which we have technology to do far better than ever before. Dismantle it, along with other pipelines, as we do away with natural gas, or probably sooner when demand for natural gas drops below economic viability, as it will. Replant the forests. Farming will always have continued where it was.
Demsrule86
(68,586 posts)Celerity
(43,416 posts)anti global climate change in general.
In an impassioned call to allies in the national climate movement, a community organizer explains: We in Appalachia are done with being a sacrifice zone.
https://www.thenation.com/article/activism/manchin-appalachia-inflation-reduction-act/
ELLISTON, VA.Appalachia wont be thrown under the bus in a side deal to climate legislation. Thats why were going to the capital next week, for the Appalachian Resistance Comes to DC rally, on September 8. Our message: Were done with being a sacrifice zone. If you care about climate, youve got to care about us too. Its the right thing to do. And its also the only way we can get better climate policies going forward. The wheelers and dealers who negotiated the Inflation Reduction Act need to work with those of us on the ground who lead this fight, rather than against us.
The side deal proposed by Senator Joe Manchin includes the undermining of laws that protect us from the fossil fuel industry. Manchin also wants Congress to fast-track his pet project, the Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP). Half-completed, the pipeline has been stopped in its tracks by effective mobilization on the ground and in the courts. I have played a small part in this. I am a single mother and grandmother. I clean houses during the day and a local doctors office at night. I spend every spare moment resisting the pipeline because it would carry fracked gas close to me and my neighbors in Montgomery County, Va., endangering our community even though the gas is not meant for us.
snip
The side deal would set new two-year limits, or maximum timelines, for environmental reviews for major projects, the summary says. It would also aim to streamline the government processes for deciding approvals for energy projects by centralizing decision-making with one lead agency, the summary adds. The bill would also attempt to clear the way for the approval of the Mountain Valley Pipeline, which would transport Appalachian shale gas about 300 miles from West Virginia to Virginia. This pipeline is a key priority of Manchins.
Other provisions would limit legal challenges to energy projects and give the Energy Department more authority to approve electric transmission lines that are deemed to be in the national interest, according to the document. One provision in the agreement could make it harder for government agencies to deny new approvals based on certain environmental impacts that are not directly caused by the project itself, said Sean Marotta, a partner at the Hogan Lovells law firm who represents pipeline companies.
https://aboutblaw.com/4ht
Link to tweet
This draft of Manchin's side deal on permitting is stamped: "Draft - API" (American Petroleum Institute).
(In case you were wondering who is calling the shots here)
https://aboutblaw.com/4iu
much more at that pdf link
NickB79
(19,253 posts)Without it, we won't be connecting the wind resources of the Midwest with the coasts, or the sun of the Southwest with the frozen North, in any timeframe fast enough to slow catastrophic climate change.
The same decade-long environmental reviews that hold up gas and oil development are ALSO holding up new transmission lines, nuclear reactors and offshore wind farms.
Celerity
(43,416 posts)NickB79
(19,253 posts)For example, North Dakota wants to construct a high-voltage line to northern Minnesota. Doing so would allow vast amounts of wind energy to hit the grid. It seems like a no-brainer, but......
It would also allow their dying coal-fired power sector a chance at a second life, because power lines don't parse out electrons made from renewables or fossil fuels.
Celerity
(43,416 posts)Response to NickB79 (Reply #13)
Celerity This message was self-deleted by its author.
womanofthehills
(8,718 posts)You want them to fast track a project that has 600 water crossings left to complete.
The dangerous Mountain Valley Pipeline (MVP) project has already destroyed and degraded the habitat of endangered species along its route, in addition to threatening our clean air, water, and our communities. MVP has consistently put profits before people and wildlife, resulting in harmful and irreparable impacts on the regions forests and streams.
The Mountain Valley Pipeline project is in jeopardy and continues to face strong community opposition. Communities have worked tirelessly to protect their health, homes and their environment and have fought for the recent wins. Court decisions invalidating recent key permits are a huge victory for our environment as the preservation of endangered species and national forests were under threat from corporate polluters.
https://appvoices.org/2022/03/17/mvp-completion/
womanofthehills
(8,718 posts)It seemed like a good time to provide an update with actual facts. The current status of MVP?
MVP construction is only 55.8% complete. Not nearly 95% as claimed by pipeline supporters.
This statistic comes from the pipeline companys own weekly reports submitted to FERC, with the most recent one being from May 2, 2022 (Appendix A, page 5).
Whats left to be constructed?
429 risky crossings of streams, creeks, rivers and wetlands.
These water crossings require massive ground disturbance, either drilling a tunnel beneath a waterway or digging a trench (and possibly blasting) right through one. The risks come not only from the water crossing construction, but also from the damage to the surrounding landscape. No other large pipeline has ever been approved across this many miles of steep slopes and high landslide risk areas. MVP is designed to pass through more than 200 miles of high landslide susceptibility, and steeper slopes typically mean more threats to clean rivers and streams as well as increased risks of pipeline explosions.
https://www.nrdc.org/experts/amy-mall/update-reasons-remain-stop-mountain-valley-pipeline
BlueIdaho
(13,582 posts)Controlling the Federal Government, its time for some other fiddler to call the tune.
Beastly Boy
(9,375 posts)The problem is, if he succeeds, it will be at Biden's expense, with all the consequences this implies.
Ordinarily, I would say Manchin is fair game. But not now, when this maneuver can derail Biden's signature legislation.
Celerity
(43,416 posts)it ex post facto.
see:
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100217137350#post9
Beastly Boy
(9,375 posts)For some reason, I got an impression that Bernie's impending vote will have an effect on IRA. It will not. In this case, it is a good opportunity for Bernie to make a statement, and it is unlikely to shut down the government.
former9thward
(32,025 posts)The so-called side deal may be made part of the CR if Schumer agrees.
Beastly Boy
(9,375 posts)Kamala will break the tie in favor of CR.
womanofthehills
(8,718 posts)Since when do you guys not care about the environment. I though Dems and the Sierra Club would be on the same side.
Mountain Valley Pipeline: Enough Is Enough
By the time the ACP was canceled, it was years behind schedule, billions over budget, and lacking key federal permits. So too is the Mountain Valley Pipeline. Eight years after it was first proposed, the 300+ mile fracked gas pipeline is barely half completed to final restoration and has ballooned in cost. Its looking increasingly likely it will never be completed.
Like the ACP, the MVP has struggled to get the permits it needs to construct the pipeline, has tried to cut through protected lands and streams, and has impacted communities.
In the interim, its become increasingly clear the demand for a big gas pipeline just isnt there. In late June, the MVP decided not to appeal to the U.S. Supreme Court on two federal permits that the Sierra Club and partners successfully challenged in federal court. MVP is now instead reapplying for federal permits a third time in less than five years.
https://www.sierraclub.org/articles/2022/07/mountain-valley-pipeline-enough-enough
Beastly Boy
(9,375 posts)All I am debating is the pros and cons of Bernie's strategy with regard to his potential vote. It is by no means a statement of my position regarding a far bigger issue which is the environmental effects of fracking.
Sympthsical
(9,076 posts)What would be the point, if a Manchin deal could then cut the legs out from under the environmental progress?
Will be interesting to see who freaks out on Sanders on this.
When Bernie hate is more important than climate change . . . well, priorities.
AntivaxHunters
(3,234 posts)Go Bernie!
Grins
(7,218 posts)Its old, outdated, impractical, not used by any of the states to manage their finances, wouldnt be considered by a corporation, and has become a political tool for REPUBLICANS - when they are not in power - to make points with the rabble that is the base.
Kill it!
Eugene
(61,900 posts)https://thehill.com/policy/energy-environment/3636073-more-than-70-house-democrats-join-push-against-manchins-permitting-reform/
elocs
(22,582 posts)when getting them to work together is like herding cats? Or as Will Rodgers is quoted as saying, "I am not a member of any organized political party. I am a Democrat." I also.
NickB79
(19,253 posts)Right now, our slow permitting system is stalling the rollout of renewable energy projects and the transmission lines they need to create a national renewable grid. We need tens of thousands of miles of high voltage lines crisscrossing the US. Last year, we built only 386 miles. At that rate, most of the renewable energy envisioned in the IRA won't be online until past 2050, when we'll be well and truly fucked just from the fossil fuels we've already emitted. We need to treat this like we did the National Highway System, installing thousands of miles per year, every year. And we need to start right now.
Beyond that, renewables are the cheapest form of energy available today. Once they start hitting the grid in force, they will overwhelm fossil fuels just based on economics. Will gas and oil producers try to build more pipelines? Probably. But they'll be driven to insolvency by cheaper electricity for home use and cheaper to drive EV's powered by wind and solar.
https://www.cnbc.com/2022/06/26/why-the-us-has-a-massive-power-line-problem.html
Nanjeanne
(4,961 posts)Progressive Revolt Against Manchins Energy Side Deal Could Snarl Government Funding
More than 70 House Democrats warned leadership against a special deal with West Virginia's Democratic senator to win his Inflation Reduction Act support.
Seventy-two House Democrats, including several committee chairs, warned House leadership Friday not to agree to ease restrictions on new energy projects in the push to keep the federal government funded past Sept. 30.
The warning came in a letter organized by Rep. Raúl Grijalva (D-N.M.), chair of the House Natural Resources Committee, and follows similar opposition by Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) in the Senate. With Democrats holding paper-thin margins in each chamber, almost any defections on a temporary funding bill vote could cause big problems.
In the face of the existential threats like climate change and MAGA extremism, House and Senate leadership has a greater responsibility than ever to avoid risking a government shutdown by jamming divisive policy riders into a must-pass continuing resolution, Grijalva said in a statement about the letter.
Permitting reform hurts already-overburdened communities, puts polluters on an even faster track, and divides the caucus. Now is just not the time, he said.
[link:https://www.huffpost.com/entry/manchin-progressive-revolt-inflation-reduction-act-energy-projects_n_631ba86ee4b0eac9f4d777e3|
Link to letter. Interesting to read the signers. https://naturalresources.house.gov/imo/media/doc/2022-09-09%20Group%20NEPA%20Letter%20to%20Pelosi%20and%20Hoyer.pdf