They put a bullseye on the head of the f-potus.

[kpete]

?1663070137

Link to tweet

?s=20&t=TI7UWBpVv1jibxrAy1CUuA

[Bernardo de La Paz]

1. Not the proper analogy to use. Needlessly draws unwanted attention. . . . nt

[jaxexpat]

3. Clickbait knows no nuance.

[Just A Box Of Rain]

7. +1

Language like this is counter-productive.

[Tetrachloride]

2. This is a very good nuance to know

[Farmer-Rick]

4. How does that put a bullseye on TFG????

So you can't prosecute a criminal politician because it makes them a target?

I don't get the analogy.

[thesquanderer]

11. I think it's saying that this is evidence that Trump is the target of the criminal investigation.

"Target" and "Bullseye" are words to describe that... but it was a poor choice to say it was on his "head."

[Initech]

5. And Chump is now going around saying he'd pardon the insurrectionists.

Ugh it really is a knee jerk criminal enterprise they’re running there.

[Ray Bruns]

6. Remember when they served 40 subpoenas to the people working for Obama?

Yea, me neither.

[Martin68]

8. One advantage of that many subpoenas is that those who might hesitate to speak don't know how

many others will speak, putting them in legal danger if they lie. Exponentially increases the odds against Trump.

[calimary]

9. Hey, whatever works!

Dare I hope that whatever works can send him to prison? Sure hope so!

[crickets]

12. Good! nt

[Evolve Dammit]

10. I have some renewed hope. May they be productive