Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsHow Judge Cannon broke with conservatives in Trump documents case
PoliticoHowever, many lawyers who support sweeping executive authority say despite that affiliation, aspects of Cannons directives appear at odds with the prevailing views among the prominent conservative lawyers group.
A robust view of executive power says its really not the job of the courts to decide whats classified or unclassified, said University of California Berkeley Law Professor John Yoo. I think most people who agree on the unitary executive also think its the president who decides whats classified and unclassified--the current, incumbent, sitting president.
Trump is challenging both those principles in his effort to fight back against the unprecedented FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago on Aug. 8 based on a search warrant seeking evidence of illegal retention of classified information, theft of government records and obstruction of justice.
Cannon hasnt ruled firmly in Trumps favor on the substanceyet. But the special master process she has adopted also appears to indulge the possibility that she or the master, Senior U.S. District Court Judge Raymond Dearie, might conclude Trump declassified the records with markings like Top Secret/SCI or that he has some right to control their use.
A robust view of executive power says its really not the job of the courts to decide whats classified or unclassified, said University of California Berkeley Law Professor John Yoo. I think most people who agree on the unitary executive also think its the president who decides whats classified and unclassified--the current, incumbent, sitting president.
Trump is challenging both those principles in his effort to fight back against the unprecedented FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago on Aug. 8 based on a search warrant seeking evidence of illegal retention of classified information, theft of government records and obstruction of justice.
Cannon hasnt ruled firmly in Trumps favor on the substanceyet. But the special master process she has adopted also appears to indulge the possibility that she or the master, Senior U.S. District Court Judge Raymond Dearie, might conclude Trump declassified the records with markings like Top Secret/SCI or that he has some right to control their use.
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
2 replies, 673 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (2)
ReplyReply to this post
2 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
How Judge Cannon broke with conservatives in Trump documents case (Original Post)
brooklynite
Sep 2022
OP
Ah, politico! An article on how Cannon is not the best little conservative in
Scrivener7
Sep 2022
#1
Scrivener7
(50,993 posts)1. Ah, politico! An article on how Cannon is not the best little conservative in
the world with comments by the guy who wrote the torture memo.
muriel_volestrangler
(101,355 posts)2. should read "...broke with 'genuine conservatives' in ..."
It's not that she sided with "liberals", "progressives" or whatever the usual opposite of "conservatives" is. She sided with Trump. You can point out that is very much not 'conservative' in its true meaning - she made a whole load of procedure and claims about rights up, on the spot. But it was all to benefit Trump. One of the troubles with most "conservatives" these days is they think of Trump first, Republican party second, and law or the USA a long way behind.
For all of Politico's talk of the Federalist Society, they basically have the same attitude as Cannon does. They just pretend they don't.