Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eko

(7,326 posts)
Sun Oct 2, 2022, 05:45 PM Oct 2022

People shouldnt be living on the east coast where hurricanes can get them.

Except for those in the shipping industry, we need to have that or all of our goods would cost way more because they would mostly have to be shipped from the west coast. And for their family's, cant expect people to live without their families, and then we need stores for them and their families, so people to work in those stores, and schools, and governments and sanitation workers and teachers and construction people and police and fire department and hospitals and,,,,,
of course this is

Eko.

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
People shouldnt be living on the east coast where hurricanes can get them. (Original Post) Eko Oct 2022 OP
Thought Democrats snowybirdie Oct 2022 #1
C'mon: "I hate X and so should you" posts are a standard around here. brooklynite Oct 2022 #7
With climate change, nearly anywhere can become a risk for wildfire or grassfires. And even more for hlthe2b Oct 2022 #2
Risk/no-risk binary thinking doesn't help here Silent3 Oct 2022 #3
You're right, they shouldn't have been. Phoenix61 Oct 2022 #4
People like to feel like their own decisions are what have kept them safe, and telling others what WhiskeyGrinder Oct 2022 #5
Well, I'm in Brooklyn HEIGHTS so I'm good. brooklynite Oct 2022 #6
Stilts enid602 Oct 2022 #8
The original post is ..."Not Nice" Stuart G Oct 2022 #9
Mars may be the only safe place to run away to. Chainfire Oct 2022 #10

snowybirdie

(5,231 posts)
1. Thought Democrats
Sun Oct 2, 2022, 06:05 PM
Oct 2022

believed in choice. Tired of seeing folks here decide what's best for me. Love your post!

hlthe2b

(102,315 posts)
2. With climate change, nearly anywhere can become a risk for wildfire or grassfires. And even more for
Sun Oct 2, 2022, 06:07 PM
Oct 2022

tornados and earthquakes. So while I cannot defend building (or re-building) in areas that are known at high risk for erosion and flooding--nor on barrier islands, I certainly can't point the finger at those in coastal areas.

Silent3

(15,243 posts)
3. Risk/no-risk binary thinking doesn't help here
Sun Oct 2, 2022, 06:22 PM
Oct 2022

Risk comes in degrees. When people decide where to live and develop housing, the degree of risk (not the absurd binary choice of risk/no risk) associated with a particular location should definitely be taken into account.

If an area is predictably risky, people who choose to live there, at the very least, should be expected to pay an insurance premium to live there. That's the whole idea behind mandatory flood insurance.

Those developments in Florida where everyone had a canal in their backyard... those were absurdly risky and probably never should have been built.

Phoenix61

(17,006 posts)
4. You're right, they shouldn't have been.
Sun Oct 2, 2022, 06:32 PM
Oct 2022

I live in Florida but there’s not a snowball’s chance in hell I’d live on a barrier island. Once upon a time the only structures on them were little vacation cottages filled with hand me down furniture.
Fingers crossed FEMA pays them out then refuses to insure any structures in those places.

WhiskeyGrinder

(22,370 posts)
5. People like to feel like their own decisions are what have kept them safe, and telling others what
Sun Oct 2, 2022, 06:33 PM
Oct 2022

they should or shouldn't do gives them that feeling, whether it's where to live, how to eat, what they should do with their vocations, how to be in relationship with others -- all of it.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»People shouldnt be living...