The holes in Herschel Walker's explanations

[brooklynite]

After a couple of not terribly enlightening interviews on Fox News, Herschel Walker did a little more explaining Thursday morning in an interview with Hugh Hewitt.

But that interview reinforced several key holes in his accounting of the allegation that he had paid for an abortion 13 years ago — an allegation, published by the Daily Beast, which Walker denies and which The Washington Post has not independently confirmed.

The first is Walker’s continued claim that he doesn’t know the identity of the person making the allegation.

In the days after the initial Daily Beast report, Walker said this in two Fox interviews. Then the Daily Beast reported late Wednesday that the woman is, in fact, one of the mothers of his children. But Walker still says he doesn’t know who she is. The Post has not confirmed the Daily Beast report.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2022/10/06/walker-hewitt-interview-abortion/

[mobeau69]

1. With his brain one can't expect him to be a good liar.

It’s harder to lie than to tell the truth.

[The Blue Flower]

2. A good liar must have a good memory

That's why he's so bad at it.

[elias7]

3. In any other era, he would be gone as a candidate

Republicans have become utterly corrupt and rudderless

They don’t really believe in a democracy