I wish people would stop just asking if the 2020 election was stolen

[Maraya1969]

They need to ask for at least one specific piece of evidence that it was stolen.

Just ask these people to put up or shut up. I can't believe they are getting away with these bullshit talking points and no one asks them to be specific!

[WA-03 Democrat]

1. 2016

2004
2000
1980

These were the steals

[SoCalDavidS]

5. Don't Forget The Russians Helped TFG Win 2016

I still believe that Hillary was the rightful winner.

[TigressDem]

2. NO 63 lawsuits brought a lunch bag of evidence when it needed a shopping cart full.

There was a certain amount of issues with votes that were caught and not counted,
but there was NO EVIDENCE - ZERO of wide spread election fraud and that was the case over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over ..... 63 times.


NO EVIDENCE OF WIDESPREAD ELECTION FRAUD.

STOP THE STEAL WAS A HOAX.

Ya LOST.

DEAL WITH IT.

[ProfessorGAC]

3. Lunch Bag Of Evidence? Really?

I suppose if it was an empty lunch bag. "Somebody told me that somebody told them that somebody might have seen something" is not evidence. It's made up nonsense.

[TigressDem]

4. So here is the deal...

When voting by mail, there were many districts who DEMANDED that you HAND WRITE the return address.

Have you met old people? They get these return address labels for free AND they use them. An 80+ year old trying to hand write their address. You think you can read that?

SO voting obstacles put in place, but as these exceptions were found they were resolved or set aside and not counted.

DEAD people voting... same as the felon purge... how many George Smiths in a city or county or state? Well FELONS use THAT as an alias, so drop them all. George Smith, not a felon, not dead goes to vote and has to cast a provisional ballot. Evidence of an exception, yes. Ultimately an issue of fraud? NO Dead person voting? NO.

But a lunch bag of exceptions and aberrations and questionable items, yeah. Every year a tiny bit of this happens.

BUT enough to change the election?

NO EVIDENCE of that.

[ProfessorGAC]

6. You're Making My Point

There wasn't a lunch bag of evidence. There was no evidence.
Your reply is agreeing with me.

[TigressDem]

7. Well, it isn't what you and I or a judge would call evidence....

But for the sake of giving the other side enough rope to hang themselves....

I make the concession.

There was a smidgen of truth, but not enough to have even brought to court because it really would not have changed a thing.

And ProfessorGAC, I happily agree with you.

I simply tell my tRumper family and acquaintances that what Rudy brought in his lunch bag was NOT any where near enough to prove the stories he told with his mouth and every judge knew it and told him so. It's in the paperwork of the dismissals and why he is being threatened with disbarment.

A lawyer should obey the law.

Just like a pResident should.

THERE IS A REAL ADULT IN THE WHITE HOUSE NOW WHO KNOWS THAT AND IS DOING WHAT IS GOOD FOR AMERICA... his job.

BIDEN BIDEN BIDEN BIDEN

[ProfessorGAC]

8. Same Page!!!

Have a good day. I'm subbing physics at a HS I haven't been to before, so gotta go!