Breaking- DOJ asks Appeals Court to end Special Master's review of Documents

[malaise]

The Slobfather will soon be indicted..
That Florida judge is going to face some serious consequences for malfeasance.
That is all.

More here

https://www.democraticunderground.com/100217253453

[DickKessler]

1. We're really coming to an inflection point.

[malaise]

2. He could help

and jump😀

[we can do it]

4. I think so too.

[50 Shades Of Blue]

3. Just saw that on Nicolle Wallace's show!

[malaise]

8. Yep

Added a more detailed link to OP

[superpatriotman]

5. Let's take off the kid gloves

And quit legitimizing the crimes and treasons of the entire republick party and it’s figurehead

[onenote]

6. Here's something that is pellucidly clear: Cannon will not face serious consequences for malfeasance

Her decision might get reversed, but that will be all.

[malaise]

7. She will eventually

She’s a disgrace to the profession

[onenote]

9. Nope. She may be a disgrace, but she has a lifetime appointment and that's not changing.

[bluestarone]

10. Yep and that

Is the sad part. She can go on to help the cult, whenever she gets the chance.

[onenote]

11. Every year over a thousand complaints are filed regarding federal judges

And every year the majority of them are based on a complaint about a decision made by the judge. And those complaints are dismissed because the Code of Judicial Conduct is clear:
Judicial-Conduct Rule 4(b)(1) ;“[c]ognizable misconduct does not include an allegation that calls into question the correctness of a judge’s ruling, including a failure to recuse.”

The rationale for not treating a judge's decision-making as the basis for a misconduct complaint is explained as follows:

Rule 4(b)(1) tracks the Act, 28 U.S.C. § 352(b)(1)(A)(ii), in excluding from the definition of misconduct allegations “[d]irectly related to the merits of a decision or procedural ruling.” This exclusion preserves the independence of judges in the exercise of judicial authority by ensuring that the complaint procedure is not used to collaterally call into question the substance of a judge’s decision or procedural rul- ing. Any allegation that calls into question the correctness of an official decision or procedural ruling of a judge — without more — is merits-related."

Every judge makes rulings that are appealed and sometimes those decisions are reversed and sometimes they are upheld and sometimes the decision is unanimous and sometimes its a split decision. That is the system for reviewing a judge's decision making and its not clear how it would work -- and who would be the ultimate judge -- if a decision that was upheld or even one that was reversed could then be reviewed again, not to change the outcome but to punish the judge.

[bluestarone]

13. I absolutely agree with all your saying.

I have to say here though, that THIS particular judge (in my eyes only) has let TFG destroy her. I don't know her from Adam, but after her thinking here, i DO NOT think she could ever make a right decision. Again only my personal thoughts.

[Blue Owl]

12. That whole special master gambit was all bullshit

just like we knew all along. A diarrhea delay tactic by FF45 to spray some more liquid feces while he's still a free man....