General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsTrump's big mouth blows a hole in his lawyer's defense-strategy in rape-defamation-case.
https://www.rawstory.com/e-jean-carroll-trump-2658467176/Jean Carrol says that Trump raped her.
He accuses her of lying.
She sues him for defamation.
Trump's defense is that he cannot be sued for defamation because he made that statement while being President.
The case drags on.
Trump gets served with a notice that he must sit for deposition.
How does he react?
He repeats all of the defamatory statements about her he made while being President, except this time he is NOT President.
gab13by13
(21,350 posts)that defaming Carroll was not an official duty of the president? I thought that Trump filed an appeal to have his case dismissed based on those grounds and the judge shot him down?
CaptainTruth
(6,592 posts)From Wikipedia:
"In 1982, the Supreme Court held in Nixon v. Fitzgerald that the President enjoys absolute immunity from civil litigation for official acts undertaken while he or she is President."
I believe the issue is that defaming someone is not an "official act" of the President, so he doesn't have immunity.
calimary
(81,304 posts)against her will constitutes anything REMOTELY like an official act.
Except maybe in his own twisted little mind. But that doesnt put it in the law books or the criminal code.
TomSlick
(11,098 posts)a president's absolute immunity applies if the alleged actions are within the "outer perimeter" of a president's official duties. I think it hard to imagine that defamation about a purely personal matter is even close to that "outer perimeter" and there would be no immunity.
NullTuples
(6,017 posts)the qualified immunity doctrine they invented applies to him as top cop....or some other such completely twisted reasoning.
dsc
(52,162 posts)but they required him to sit for the deposition while they were making up their minds.
greymattermom
(5,754 posts)and he refuses to pay?
DetlefK
(16,423 posts)Step 2: A fine for contempt of court and the court garnishes his property and auctions it off to cover the sum he owes.
Response to DetlefK (Reply #5)
NullTuples This message was self-deleted by its author.
groundloop
(11,519 posts)Jirel
(2,018 posts)His lawyer is drinking heavily.
HubertHeaver
(2,522 posts)With a bourbon chaser.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)(and I like your presentation here)
NCjack
(10,279 posts)now it does not count against him if he repeats the defamation.
republianmushroom
(13,597 posts)bringthePaine
(1,728 posts)Joinfortmill
(14,427 posts)not fooled
(5,801 posts)She has the dress!
summer_in_TX
(2,739 posts)Was it ruled outside of the statute of limitations?
I guessed that was why the case was now a defamation case but don't know for sure.
not fooled
(5,801 posts)The original rape case was thrown out on some legal technicality, perhaps because outside the original statute of limitations.
However, per this article published October 12:
[link:https://www.forbes.com/sites/brianbushard/2022/10/12/trump-rape-lawsuit-from-e-jean-carroll-will-proceed-trump-faces-deposition-next-week/?sh=54a938c111c1|]
Carroll is also expected to file a lawsuit under New Yorks Adult Survivors Act, which takes effect on November 24, and allows claims for alleged rape to be revived, regardless of a statute of limitations, which in this case has expired. In a statement, Carrolls attorney Roberta Kaplan said she looks forward to filing our case under the Adult Survivors Act and moving forward to trial with all dispatch. (Attorneys for Trump did not immediately respond to a Forbes inquiry.)
summer_in_TX
(2,739 posts)Thank you!