Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsJohn Durham's Investigation Has Disclosed Corruption: His Own
Link to tweet
Marcy Wheeler AKA emptywheel
https://newrepublic.com/article/168311/john-durhams-investigation-disclosed-corruption
No paywall
https://archive.ph/rSkpA
In the wake of special counsel John Durhams embarrassing second acquittal earlier this month, Durhams fansfrom the Wall Street Journal editorial page to former Attorney General Bill Barr to Donald Trump himselfhave tried to justify Durhams work by claiming he disclosed corruption.
Perhaps he did. But whose? Indeed, the Durham fiasco has disclosed, first and foremost, how much damage Republicans are willing to do in an attempt to deny the results of Robert Muellers own special counsel investigation.
Barr appointed Durham immediately after the Mueller investigation finished, over 40 months ago. At the time, there was no evidence a crime had been committed. The sole explanation Barr offered in his memoir was that I still had to launch US Attorney John Durhams investigation into the genesis of this bogus scandal. Thus far, the only scalp Durham can claim is that of an FBI lawyer who pleaded guilty to doctoring an email, but even there, that crime was discovered by a Justice Department inspector general investigation, one that found no evidence that politics affected Muellers investigation.
Durhams own investigations have flopped. In June, a District of Columbia jury found lawyer Michael Sussmann not guilty of lying to hide a tie between the Hillary Clinton presidential campaign and a tip about some cybersecurity anomalies Sussmann shared with the FBI in September 2016. Then, after the government finished its case, a Republican-appointed judge ruled that Durham had charged the primary source for Christopher Steeles dossier, Igor Danchenko, with lying even though the alleged false statement was literally true. Then a jury did the rest. It acquitted the Russian analyst of four additional charges. Forty months in, two juries and a judge concluded Durham had proven no crime.
*snip*
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
4 replies, 1063 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (22)
ReplyReply to this post
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
John Durham's Investigation Has Disclosed Corruption: His Own (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Oct 2022
OP
NoMoreRepugs
(9,457 posts)1. No crime proven - imagine that.
MyOwnPeace
(16,937 posts)2. Just another for the past corrupt AG to continue......
the legacy of "Benghazi! Benghazi!" hearings.
Can you imagine the shit-shows they'll be staging if they win control of either house come January?
Solly Mack
(90,785 posts)3. Shocker
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,413 posts)4. The killer paragraph ...
[ See original for lotsa links ]
Trumps coffee boy, Papadopoulos, admitted he lied about when he got advance notice of Russias plans to help Trump. Trumps national security adviser, Mike Flynn, confessed that he lied about how he undermined several of President Obamas foreign policy efforts on a series of calls with the Russian ambassador. Trumps personal lawyer, Michael Cohen, admitted that he lied to Congress to hide the direct contact he had with the Kremlin in pursuit of an impossibly lucrative real estate deal. A judge found that Trumps campaign manager, Paul Manafort, lied about a meeting with a mansince sanctioned as a known Russian Intelligence Services agentwhere he shared campaign strategy and discussed plans to carve up Ukraine. And a jury found that Trumps dirty trickster, Roger Stone, lied about the true nature of his back channel to the Russian hack-and-leak effort. All the Barr misrepresentations and all the failed prosecutions and all the Trump pardons cannot erase Muellers results.