Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bigtree

(86,005 posts)
Sat Oct 29, 2022, 02:58 PM Oct 2022

Jan. 6 FAFO, Army edition

Carol Leonnig @CarolLeonnig 3h
Biden White House takes rare step, blocks promotion of one of 2 Army generals who initially refused on Jan 6 to send National Guard to Capitol and then tried to cover up their role. Gen Piatt denied 4-star; Gen Flynn got his.

White House rejects promoting general involved in Capitol riot response

The White House rejected a recommendation by senior Pentagon officials to promote an Army general who came under intense scrutiny after the Pentagon’s slow response to the riot at the Capitol, defense officials said, pushing the officer to a near-certain retirement.

Lt. Gen. Walter E. Piatt, the director of the Army staff, was backed to become the four-star general at Army Futures Command by Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin and Army Secretary Christine Wormuth — both of whom were appointed by President Biden — and Gen. James McConville, the Army’s top officer, said two defense officials, speaking on the condition of anonymity due to the sensitivity of the issue. The White House declined to send a nomination for Piatt to the Senate for months, the officials said, effectively killing the possibility.

Piatt found himself in political crosshairs within days of Jan. 6 after former Capitol Police chief Steven Sund, who resigned after the attack, accused the general of saying in a key meeting during the riot that he could not recommend to his boss at the time, Army Secretary Ryan McCarthy, that the D.C. National Guard be deployed to help police quell the violence. Piatt, Sund said, exasperated other senior U.S. officials on a conference call by expressing concerns about how it would look if military personnel responded.

Piatt initially denied Sund’s allegations in a statement but acknowledged in a call with reporters about two weeks later that he had conferred with others who were present that it was possible he made comments to that effect. In sworn congressional testimony, Piatt said in June 2021 that senior Army officials “all immediately understood the gravity of the situation” but still needed to develop a plan before dispatching armed personnel into the fray.

A key difference between the fate of the two generals’ careers was timing, defense officials said: While Piatt had not yet been nominated for a promotion when the assault on the Capitol happened, Flynn already had been confirmed by the Senate in December 2020, before the attack.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/2022/10/29/walter-piatt-army-capitol-riot-national-guard/


...I love how the Biden administration always follows through.
3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Jan. 6 FAFO, Army edition (Original Post) bigtree Oct 2022 OP
Ty, Joe! This pos should be arrested! SheltieLover Oct 2022 #1
It sends a message. 70sEraVet Oct 2022 #2
Is this the level of command . . . ? gratuitous Oct 2022 #3

gratuitous

(82,849 posts)
3. Is this the level of command . . . ?
Sat Oct 29, 2022, 04:26 PM
Oct 2022

Is this the level of command where if you're passed over for promotion you might as well retire? I'm asking because I surely do not know.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Jan. 6 FAFO, Army edition