Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

BootinUp

(47,195 posts)
Mon Oct 31, 2022, 09:25 AM Oct 2022

One effect of the twitter verification fee








https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1586978281286402049.html

Dave Troy Profile picture
Dave Troy

Twitter logo
6h • 4 tweets • 1 min read
1/If Twitter proceeds to charge for verification, it will effectively deplatform (or demote) tens or hundreds of thousands of journalists, compounding the problem that citizens lack access to trusted, reliable information.

2/And yes, there are “journalists” who are verified who shouldn’t be endorsed, and that will also be a major problem, especially now. For my part, I had opportunities to pursue it years ago when it required pulling strings. I did not, as I didn’t think it was egalitarian.

3/And I figured I could wait in line until there is a fair, sane process. I’m still waiting. And for those that missed it, here’s my piece on what’s going on.


No, Elon and Jack are not “competitors.” They’re collaborating.
Wherein I attempt to clarify a number of ridiculous and false narratives currently taking hold about Musk and Dorsey’s “rivalry.”
https://davetroy.medium.com/no-elon-and-jack-are-not-competitors-theyre-collaborating-3e88cde5267d

4/The amount of money that can be realized from charging for verification (tens of millions annually) pales in comparison to Twitter’s $3.7bn annual revenue, so it’s rather immaterial. The reason to do it is to harm journalism and promote nonsense.
8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

FBaggins

(26,760 posts)
3. Journalists can't afford to pay?
Mon Oct 31, 2022, 09:40 AM
Oct 2022

This must be that odd definition of "journalist" that includes 1st/2nd Amendment "auditors"

Indykatie

(3,697 posts)
7. This Was My Initial Thought Too - What Legit Working Journalist Can't Afford $20 a Month?
Mon Oct 31, 2022, 10:48 AM
Oct 2022

I expect the actual fee will be less than $20, a number that IMO was a trial balloon to gage reaction.

True Dough

(17,331 posts)
6. That Musky fella is just getting started
Mon Oct 31, 2022, 09:52 AM
Oct 2022

He's going to find all kinds of ways to monetize this thing, or at least attempt to. And he won't care one bit about the harm he's doing.

PortTack

(32,796 posts)
8. Charging so they harm journalism and promote nonsense
Mon Oct 31, 2022, 12:03 PM
Oct 2022

Agree with the promoting nonsense. As far as harming journalism, that’s up to the journalists. Chose another platform for your work.

Ppl tire of the nonsense. If that’s all there is, then it’s really no different than buying the Inquirier or the NY Post..why bother.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»One effect of the twitter...