Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

pstokely

(10,528 posts)
Thu Nov 3, 2022, 10:20 AM Nov 2022

Is that big lead for Sharice Davids over Amanda Adkins just a polling mirage? (KC Star)

another reason to ignore the polls good or bad and GOTV
https://www.kansascity.com/opinion/readers-opinion/guest-commentary/article268199257.html

Why? Because the poll has all the hallmarks of “nonresponse bias,” The Times’ Nate Cohn explained in a newsletter published Tuesday. Basically, Democratic voters in the 3rd District were far more likely to answer pollsters’ questions than Republicans, and that gap could well have skewed the final numbers toward Davids.
Nonresponse bias is a national issue for pollsters — it probably explains why 2020 polls memorably underestimated Donald Trump’s support in the presidential election — but the problem really showed up in the recent Kansas poll: Democrats were 70% more likely than Republicans to answer questions. That’s a huge number. “I’m pretty sure that’s the largest disparity in partisan nonresponse we’ve ever encountered,” Cohn wrote, adding that Davids’ apparent double-digit lead was “a solid 10 percentage points more than I would have guessed before we fielded the poll.”
Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Is that big lead for Shar...