General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsIn Case You Missed It - Social Security Fun Facts
Spread the word: Friends don't let friends vote Repuke!
XanaDUer2
(10,683 posts)Biophilic
(3,665 posts)Im half afraid it will tip me over into looking and sounding like an idiot MAGA. Yup it makes me that angry. The only difference is we have a real reason to be angry.
XanaDUer2
(10,683 posts)We voted.
Biophilic
(3,665 posts)Sometimes staying positive is difficult.
Joinfortmill
(14,428 posts)I just heard Joy Reid tell Nicholle say African-Americans are not coming out in droves to vote in Florida.
It's depressing
paleotn
(17,931 posts)SheltieLover
(57,073 posts)Martin Eden
(12,870 posts)It hurts the magats as much as the rest of us, but they've been brainwashed.
Deuxcents
(16,244 posts)I think the public is misled about SS n Medicare n some elected purposely use this for trying to destroy these benefits. We need to better message
XanaDUer2
(10,683 posts)I'm in a purple swing state, heavy retiree area. Not one ad about SS. ads about abortion and over building, and cost of living
calimary
(81,310 posts)crickets
(25,981 posts)Joinfortmill
(14,428 posts)TexasBushwhacker
(20,202 posts)When there is a surplus, the extra is invested in the safest investment on the planet - US Treasury Securities - rather than stuffing that cash under some giant mattress. Those securities, which pay a small amount of interest, are then sold to investors, mutual funds, retirement programs, etc. This is the way it has always been.
Response to FakeNoose (Original post)
Baked Potato This message was self-deleted by its author.
DENVERPOPS
(8,835 posts)They pulled the gasoline and inflation during the Carter years. This is just a massive replay......
Response to DENVERPOPS (Reply #19)
Baked Potato This message was self-deleted by its author.
DENVERPOPS
(8,835 posts)The Republicans screwing with elections got it's start just prior to the 1980 Presidential Election.........Seems the Repubs (HWBush & minions) went to work desperate to get Reagan into office. They did something much much more serious than RatFucking, like Nixon had done.......They did something called Treason, by communicating in secret, with one of our enemies, (Iran) to help the Repubs throw the election away from Carter and towards Reagan. AND they pulled it off and Reagan was more or less an "Installed" president.....(Does this sound familiar??Putin??????)
(I can tell you from my experience with past President Carter, that he is one of the finest human beings, ever. Period.
His wife is another incredibly spectacular human being.......)
The Republicans defrauded Carter of his second term, corruptly. And me and others here have been shouting our heads off, screaming at the top of our lungs for 40+ years about the shit the Republicans were doing.
The Republicans have escalated their attack every year since then. And corrupted even more Presidential elections in 2000 and 2004.
You had it right BP: "I knew that Repubs were crooks and dems were for the people"
Response to DENVERPOPS (Reply #54)
Baked Potato This message was self-deleted by its author.
Ligyron
(7,633 posts)Hence the drive 55, etc. pfffft
Turns out we'll probably burn up the atmosphere before we ever run out of oil.
The Unmitigated Gall
(3,819 posts)OldBaldy1701E
(5,130 posts)After two attempts and money spent that I don't have on lawyers who did little, all I know about Social Security is that I have a card with those words on it. That's it.
love_katz
(2,580 posts)It's NOT entitlement. It's an insurance policy that we have paid into, for our entire working lives.
phoenix75
(289 posts)Perfectly stated.
IronLionZion
(45,451 posts)Kind of like how tax cuts will trickle down and wars help the economy. Wasn't oil supposed to be super cheap after invading Iraq?
And of course they like to call it "entitlements" so they can say that you are entitled to nothing you lazy bum. You just didn't work hard enough to be rich.
republianmushroom
(13,614 posts)Dave says
(4,618 posts)but it's like talking to a brick wall.
May things change - and quickly!!
OnlinePoker
(5,722 posts)And that is only as long as the recovery stays strong. Teetering on the brink of a recession, that date could change for the worse.
Doremus
(7,261 posts)come. I'm sure rightwingers will use its pending "insolvency" to make the case for getting rid of it and stupid people will fall for it.
Another fun fact: SS was tax-free until friend-of-the-people Saint Ronny made it taxable. Another kick in the teeth we can thank them for!
James48
(4,436 posts)Congress hasnt borrowed trillions (from Social Security) so they dont have to pay it back.
Congress doesnt borrow from the Social Security dollars.
Facts matter.
Doremus
(7,261 posts)One of his major campaign promises was to put SS funds into a "lockbox." My memory is so bad I don't recall his reasoning.
He was referring to the budget surplus under President Clinton
ProfessorPlum
(11,257 posts)Gore was explicitly saying that the federal government needed to make sure they pay those bonds back to SS, instead of fantasizing about how great it would be to just not pay them back and leave SS recipients struggling.
The way they are doing now.
ProfessorPlum
(11,257 posts)SS sits on top of a stack of special government bonds that were bought using the extra money that Tip O'Neill and Reagan negotiated in the 1980s to raise payroll taxes in anticipation of the baby boomers hitting social security.
Like every treasury bond, these will need to be paid back by the federal government as they are slowly converted to payments over the next couple of decades.
Republicans would love for the government to default on these bonds, representing what would be a massive picking of the pockets of working people, never to be paid back.
ProfessorPlum
(11,257 posts)directly from workers to recipients, as it was designed. It's only the boomers hitting retirement age that caused the need for SS to build up a war chest of treasury bonds in anticipation of it.
Fla Dem
(23,690 posts)I knew the government has used SS funds and the concern has always been whether or not it would ever be paid back.
I did not know it was so much. Seems to me the Rethugs want to cut off the hands that fund all THEIR exorbitant spending and corporate tax reductions.
Evolve Dammit
(16,741 posts)I have never known hatred like I currently do.
a kennedy
(29,672 posts)ALL YEAR. (Or however long political ads have started.). Damn, I know some of this info, but not all and its VERY, VERY important. 🤬 🤬 🤬
progree
(10,909 posts)Last edited Thu Nov 3, 2022, 07:48 PM - Edit history (2)
I agree with the OP except that "borrowed" should not be in quotes. And it isn't Congress that is borrowing the funds. It's the federal government by an automatic mechanism. (But Congress passed all the SS legislation that has been and is in effect, so maybe that's a technicality).
BY LAW, each year the surpluses are loaned to the federal government, and no, that didn't start with Reagan. Nor did it start with LBJ. It has been that way from the beginning.
The government in turn creates special issue treasury securities that are deposited in the Social Security and Medicare trust funds. These earn interest -- paid in the form of more special issue treasury securities. In a year when Social Security revenues fall short of benefits then trust fund securities are redeemed to make up the difference. This is already occurring:
"At the end of 2021, Social Securitys trust fund reserves were $2,852 billion, having decreased by $56 billion over the year." - Source: 2022 Trustees report, https://www.ssa.gov/oact/trsum/
Similarly the Medicare Trust fund.
BTW, anything you read about "pilfering" of the programs is literal fucking bullshit.
Social Security Trustees 2022 report -- https://www.ssa.gov/oact/trsum/
Edited to add, from the above link:
Federal law requires that the Trustees invest all excess funds in interest-bearing securities backed by the full faith and credit of the United States. The Department of the Treasury currently invests all program revenues in special non-marketable U.S. Government securities, which earn interest equal to rates on marketable securities with durations defined in law. The balances in the trust funds, which represent the accumulated value, including interest, of all prior program annual surpluses and deficits, provide automatic authority to pay benefits.
All emphasis in above by Progree.
(By the way, the 4 trustees are all high level Biden administratrion appointees. This isn't a report by right wing economists or the right wing media or such)
The report is signed by:
Janet Yellen, Secretary of the Treasury, and Managing Trustee of the Trust Funds.
Xavier Becerra, Secretary of Health and Human Services, and Trustee.
Martin J. Walsh, Secretary of Labor, and Trustee.
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, and Trustee.
(and if some idiot says, well what do you expect liberal Democrats to say? Well, the same language is in Trump era SS Trustees reports too, for example this snapshot from 2019: https://web.archive.org/web/20191125074043/https://www.ssa.gov/oact/trsum/ )
Actuarial Note #142 of January 1999 (how interest rate determined, the trust fund securities etc.) http://www.ssa.gov/OACT/NOTES/note142.html
On a related subject,
But isn't it "game over" when the SS Trust Fund runs out in about 2035? - Ans, NO
https://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1016&pid=328199
Edited to add - Its also not true that Medicare is paid for by a separate tax. Part A is (the hospital insurance part) -- its part of our FICA taxes just like SS is. But Part B and Part D are paid by general funds and premiums. That's in the Social Security Trustees report as well https://www.ssa.gov/oact/trsum/ .
Response to progree (Reply #30)
Baked Potato This message was self-deleted by its author.
progree
(10,909 posts)bahboo
(16,343 posts)thx for posting...
progree
(10,909 posts)FakeNoose
(32,645 posts)I didn't create this meme, I found it and wanted to share it on DU for obvious reasons.
I think the original creator was someone who wanted to keep the narrative simple and easy to remember. But skipping some of the important details might be confusing, especially when so many DUers are quite knowledgeable on these things.
Thanks for this, my friend!
progree
(10,909 posts)KPN
(15,646 posts)handle on the facts and nuances. As I have always understood it, the basic problem is that retired people are living and drawing SS benefits longer than originally anticipated; that, on the whole, the payments by the people drawing benefits were insufficient to cover the actual benefits being drawn. Is that correct or is it more about how the surplus is being invested? Do you see reasonable fixes?
MerryBlooms
(11,770 posts)KPN
(15,646 posts)to believe this, but better to know the basis for these facts before using them.
OnlinePoker
(5,722 posts)The Old-Age and Survivors Insurance (OASI) Trust Fund, which pays retirement and survivors benefits, will be able to pay scheduled benefits on a timely basis until 2034, one year later than reported last year. At that time, the fund's reserves will become depleted and continuing tax income will be sufficient to pay 77 percent of scheduled benefits.
The Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Fund, which pays disability benefits, is no longer projected to be depleted within the 75-year projection period. By comparison, last year's report projected that it would be able to pay scheduled benefits only until 2057.
The OASI and DI funds are separate entities under law. The report also presents information that combines the reserves of these two funds in order to illustrate the actuarial status of the Social Security program as a whole. The hypothetical combined OASI and DI funds would be able to pay scheduled benefits on a timely basis until 2035, one year later than reported last year. At that time, the combined funds' reserves will become depleted and continuing tax income will be sufficient to pay 80 percent of scheduled benefits.
The Hospital Insurance (HI) Trust Fund, or Medicare Part A, which helps pay for services such as inpatient hospital care, will be able to pay scheduled benefits until 2028, two years later than reported last year. At that time, the fund's reserves will become depleted and continuing total program income will be sufficient to pay 90 percent of total scheduled benefits.
https://www.ssa.gov/oact/trsum/
--------------------------
So the only fund that is fiscally sound at the moment is Disability Insurance. Unless the Democrats retain the House and Senate AND pass legislation to shore up the other two funds, things are going to get ugly in a few years.
Haggard Celine
(16,846 posts)It might be. But I think there's going to be a lot of unrest starting with the elections. All it would take would be some asshole lighting the fuse. And it's a short fuse. Ugly, indeed!
Cha
(297,298 posts)Fascist Zombie Fuckers better NOT take it away.
Millions could be out in the fucking street.
paleotn
(17,931 posts)I couldn't disagree more. This is such an egregious meme. SS funds were invested in the safest debt the planet has ever seen. US government securities. If the full faith and credit of the US government is in question, then we and everyone else on earth has much greater things to worry about.
The rest is quite accurate.
pansypoo53219
(20,978 posts)onecaliberal
(32,863 posts)wryter2000
(46,051 posts)This is what I scream here every day. Bookmark this. Never mind the "we paid into it" as if it's a fund, and now we get to draw from it. Payments come out of that box on your check stub, not out of general funds.
Get thee to the greatest page!
But why can't democrats just say that on television in response?
Haru
(27 posts)I tell my kids if they vote Republican..... I am moving in !
FakeNoose
(32,645 posts)Skittles
(153,169 posts)FACTS
panader0
(25,816 posts)Hermit-The-Prog
(33,349 posts)FakeNoose
(32,645 posts)We have to do this, and the time is now.
We need a Blue Tsunami like never before.
Hermit-The-Prog
(33,349 posts)2naSalit
(86,646 posts)Interestingly, a lot of Rs that I speak to know this already.
DFW
(54,405 posts)If and when I actually start getting payments, it's all going to either Democratic candidates running for office or organizations like Planned Parenthood.
The Jungle 1
(4,552 posts)They need my money to do that.
It is my money. I paid it into the system and I want it back.