So with GA runoff ...

[rustysgurl]

Will the 2% Libertarian typically go to Warnock giving him the win in the runoff (hypothetically)???

[iemanja]

1. Everyone won't vote in the run off

That’s the problem with them.

[Claustrum]

2. Not really. Libertarians are generally more republican than democrats.

Though, the run-off will be all about keeping your base turned out rather than adding more voters.

[AZSkiffyGeek]

6. They may have been never-Walkers

Who couldn’t/wouldn’t vote D. They may just sit out.
This could be the race for control of the Senate.

[jcgoldie]

3. it will be more about turnout

If things play out as they should... we dont have numbers from Nevada but McCaskill said earlier it looks good... then we could already have senate control.

[EarlG]

4. I gotta believe

that if things keep on playing out tonight the way they're playing out, Republicans will be pretty depressed and Democrats will be energized.

[W_HAMILTON]

5. McCaskill made a good point.

If we win PA and maintain elsewhere, there were enough signs that Republicans didn't want to vote for Walker (e.g., Kemp easily winning, but Walker losing or going to a runoff) that odds are they would not come out for a special election to put Walker over the top when Senate control may not even be contested at that point (if we win AZ/NV/PA, as McCaskill seemed to think we were on course to do).

[Wishful-Thinking]

7. Not sure about that, but if I got this right....

Joy Reid on MSNBC just hypothesized that we would win 50 seats with Arizona, Nevada, and Pennsylvania which would make the runoff in Georgia be for the 51st seat, and therefore cause less fervent voting on the right since it wouldn’t change the democratic majority.

[Bayard]

8. First of all--Why is this even close?

It hurts my head.

I so wished Stacy would win gov, but now, at least she can get out the vote for Warnock in a runoff.