If Dems get the 50-49 split in the Senate,

[no_hypocrisy]

I believe the money going to Hershel Walker would dry up. The die would have been cast.

[malaise]

1. He may drop out of the race

😀😀😀

[onenote]

3. There is exactly zero chance of that happening.

[honest.abe]

2. Yep. The runoff would not have much impact.

50 or 51 Dem Senators wouldnt make much difference during the next two years given the House goes R.

[Pachamama]

4. The moment Nevada goes for Cortez-Masto - the money flow stops for Walker and GOP voters

…stay home.

They were already holding their noses - but they don’t want to have that embarrassing mess going to Senate and embarrassing the GOP further.

[Claustrum]

5. It's not just the money.

A lot of republican voted for Walker only for the senate. When that is taken out of the equation, some of them won't show up. The 2% libertarians votes would most definitely not show up for Walker if Senate is not up for grab.

We need to get NV so Warnock's race would get much easier.

[BumRushDaShow]

6. "some of them won't show up."

Since Kemp was "in like Flynn", it's "mission accomplished" in terms of state/local politics, so there would be no need for many of them to bother with just one person on the ballot.

[czarjak]

7. Libertarianism: Vote R, then swear you're not one. Like a good neighbor

[ProfessorGAC]

8. That's An Exaggeration!

Only 99.9999% of Ls vote R!

[czarjak]

10. My motto is Correct Me If I'm Wrong. Thanks, I'll tell my neighbor.

[Johnny2X2X]

9. More than that. People won't vote for him

Republicans weee holding their noses and voting for him because the Senate was on the line. They’ll stay home in December without the Senate on the line.

[D_Master81]

11. Maybe

At this point does money truly matter? Will it effect Dem turnout since we’d already have control of the senate?