Forcing Thousands of Teens to Parent in a Post-Roe Nation
(a lengthy, unsettling read)
Forcing Thousands of Teens to Parent in a Post-Roe Nation
11/5/2022 by Julie Maslowsky, Laura Lindberg and Tracey Wilkinson
Over the next year, at least 7,000 U.S. teenagers will likely be forced into parenthood because they were not able to obtain a desired legal abortion.
Maranda Corely, 19, with her children in Ellisville, Miss. As of 2019, the teen pregnancy rate in the U.S. was 16.7 per 1,000 girls, ages 15-19. Experts predict at least 7,000 more teens in the U.S. will be forced into parenthood because they were not able to obtain a legal abortion following the overturning of Roe v. Wade. (Lynsey Addario / Getty Images Reportage)
The first nationwide count of abortions since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade, #WeCount, documents an estimated 10,000 fewer abortions in just the first two months after the ruling. That number is expected to rise to at least 60,000 in the year following the ruling. But while the #WeCount data are an important way to track the impact of new abortion bans, these overall national estimates do not measure the age of abortion patients and therefore camouflage the unique experiences of teenagers. In fact, teens are expected to be especially harmed by state abortion bans, given the many obstacles they will face in trying to access care.
Drawing on these findings and on previous age patterns of abortion, we estimate that over the next year, at least 7,000 U.S. teenagers will likely be forced into parenthood because they were not able to obtain a desired legal abortion following the overturning of Roe v. Wade. Not only is this a fundamental betrayal of young people and their ability to choose their own futures, it’s a social, economic and public health emergency with long-term repercussions. For a teen, being denied an abortion isn’t just a bump in the road; it forces them onto a lifelong path they didn’t choose. Pregnant people who are denied an abortion are more likely to go on to live in poverty with their children and struggle to pay for basic expenses like food and housing.
Pregnancy and childbirth are more dangerous than abortion, with higher rates of preeclampsia and pre-term delivery, particularly among younger adolescents. Children of teenage mothers are more likely to be born prematurely or with low birth weight and have long-term health needs, which compound the stress and economic struggles teen parents already face. We can expect that young people of color and those from low-income backgrounds will be further overrepresented among those who cannot obtain an abortion, increasing existing inequalities these youth already face. The few existing supports for young parents are already overtaxed and will not be able to absorb and meet the needs of thousands of teens who did not intend to become parents and their children.
Unintended motherhood can push a teen out of school and shatter plans for the future. The U.S. system of public supports for families is fragmented and particularly unsupportive in states with abortion bans, and not well-designed to meet the needs of young parents. Without needed support, young parents often struggle to graduate from high school and enter the workforce early while facing challenges in finding affordable childcare. The few existing supports for young parents are already overtaxed and will not be able to absorb and meet the needs of thousands of teens who did not intend to become parents and their children. The repercussions of these abortion bans on teens’ lives will reverberate across generations.
. . . . .
Editor’s note: At-home abortions via medication abortion are legal, safe and available in all 50 states. The organization Plan C has a comprehensive guide to finding abortion pills on their website, which is continually updated and has all the latest information on where to find abortion pills from anywhere in the U.S.
https://msmagazine.com/2022/11/05/teen-pregnancy-roe-v-wade-abortion/
= new reply since forum marked as read
Conveniently, once the fetus becomes an actual baby, it falls on the 7,000 teenagers side of the equation.
Another story I read a young couple, 20 & under, had twins. He works as a clerk at Lowe's & she doesn't work. How are they ever going to get ahead unless they have family/friends who can help out? And it didn't look like they did. These kids & their kids will be trapped in poverty the rest of their lives, most likely. How does that help a country/city/town?
I think it was Jimmy Carter who said he'd like to see a war on poverty. Well, it sounds like something he would say, anyway. 