General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsExcellent analysis of Musk: Is Elon Musk evil or simply a fool? Both. The answer is both.
Is Elon Musk evil or simply a fool?
Both. The answer is both.
Aaron Rupar
and
Noah Berlatsky
This was emailed to me in its entirety so I don't think copyright applies, but I'll still merely excerpt and include the following link:
https://aaronrupar.substack.com/p/elon-musk-destroying-twitter-why?utm_source=substack&utm_medium=email
--snip--
Spite over everything
Musk purchased Twitter in large part because he wanted to be in a position to harm many of its core users journalists, liberals, Democrats, trans people, and other marginalized communities. Twitter is a flawed but nonetheless invaluable place where these groups have come together to talk, to strategize, to fundraise, to organize, and to hold the powerful accountable.
Musk is a billionaire transphobe whos been convicted of union-busting and has been sued for racially segregating his factory floor. Hes also pathologically online. (He met his ex-partner, the musician Grimes, on Twitter.) Now that he owns Twitter, its also his chance to own the libs who have criticized and dared to mock him. Hes in a position to break their communities and drive them from online spaces where theyve built networks and formed friendships.
--snip--
Musk doesnt want to destroy Twitter in the sense of rendering it a smoking ruin with a URL that leads to the abyss. But he does want to destroy Twitter to spite his enemies. Loosely defined, that means he wants to destroy it for everyone who questions the righteousness of a world ruled by white male billionaire tech bros.
There are numerous examples of how Musks Twitter fiasco is linked to his right, and far right, ideological commitments. Musk made his first moves towards acquiring control over Twitter in April, motivated in part by Twitters content moderation targeting far right accounts. In particular, he was angered by its decision to ban former President Donald Trump after he used the platform in organizing his violent coup attempt.
--snip--
If Musk were just intent on destroying the site, he wouldnt keep backtracking by pausing the Twitter Blue program or trying to hire back employees he laid off; hed let it all burn. If he were just a fool who didnt know what he was doing but wanted the site to make money first and foremost, hed stop tweeting.
But Musk wants to make money by harming his enemies. He wants to monetize his grievance, his bigotry, and his cruelty. Hes evil and a butthead, both.
As such, Musk is a perfect symbol of the current right wing. Like the post-policy GOP, and like Trump, Musk is so ensnared in conspiracy theories and in hatred that he cant see real problems in front of his nose and makes up imaginary problems that arent there. Twitters ongoing rolling disaster is a good example of what happens when you give wealthy, hateful reactionaries absolute power over institutions and communities. By mixing self-imposed ignorance with deliberate malevolence, they destroy them.
The full piece is worth a quick read at the link above.
bucolic_frolic
(43,273 posts)Yes Twitland being managed for political purposes and private agendas. For sure.
Wounded Bear
(58,704 posts)Farmer-Rick
(10,207 posts)Musk uses and then abuses them.
If you are liberal he will target you. He will allow his bots and Nazis to crush you. It's what psychos do, they hurt others for fun and profits.
Can you imagine the glee Nazis are having crapping all over liberals on Twitter. It's their favorite thing.
Musk is very much like Trump. And liberals on Twitter are his target for abuse.
uponit7771
(90,359 posts)Upthevibe
(8,071 posts)I'm marking it (the only way I know how) to read after work..
hlthe2b
(102,351 posts)Walleye
(31,044 posts)Vengeance and vindication. If you look at everything from that perspective you can anticipate what theyre going to do
nycbos
(6,037 posts)... he has no ideology whatsoever other than to satisfy his own ego. He does not care if he gets good press or bad press, just as long as he seeing his name in the news. He follows the mantra of "there is no such thing as bad publicity."