should have obtained indictments against Trump already or whether he will or won't ever obtain any indictments. Not. A. Single. DUer.
People are entitled to their opinions, but in this case, the opinions being expressed are utterly uninformed opinions. No one here knows the status of DOJ's investigations, no one here knows what evidence has been presented to a grand jury, no one here knows what additional evidence is being gathered to present to a grand jury, no one here has 1/1000th of the experience, or knowledge of the statutory and case law, and the facts as Garland and the various US Attorneys (and other DOJ attorneys) who are involved in any of the investigation, no one here has seen not only the evidence that might be used to seek an indictment, but also the evidence, testimonial and otherwise, that the defense might offer in response to an indictment.
Consider the following: indicting someone is not an end in itself and an indictment followed by an acquittal or dismissal of the charges is bad in the average case, and a disaster in a high profile case. We don't yet know whether it will be possible to obtain a conviction against the Oath Keepers. It would be insane to start a case against Trump until the outcome of that case is known. And with respect to the Mar-A-Lago documents, there is still an ongoing court process being followed and while the 11th Circuit freed DOJ to continue to use the classified documents in its investigation, DOJ isn't going to jump the gun until the current process plays out.
= new reply since forum marked as read
