General Discussion

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,036 posts) Wed Nov 16, 2022, 04:10 PM Nov 2022

Any idea what this RW fragment is referring to? (which NYT article, title please?)

Surely a mis-interpretation at best, but I'm curious as to what prompted this:

After he left office, the FBI raided his home and took his personal belongs. And, the NYT announced quietly yesterday that no incriminating evidence was found.

6 replies

= new reply since forum marked as read

Highlight:

Any idea what this RW fragment is referring to? (which NYT article, title please?) (Original Post) Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 OP

Lies Walleye Nov 2022 #1

It sounds like a right wing talking point gab13by13 Nov 2022 #2

Just thought of: might be the dropping of Espionage case & pursuing Gov Papers & Obstruction cases Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #3

I figure the DOJ will give Trump a pass on stealing classified docs. Irish_Dem Nov 2022 #6

Here you go.. Princess Turandot Nov 2022 #4

Thanks but I thought my request was clear, for the NYT article in question Bernardo de La Paz Nov 2022 #5

Walleye

(31,046 posts)

1. Lies

Reply to Bernardo de La Paz (Original post)

Wed Nov 16, 2022, 04:12 PM

Nov 2022

gab13by13

(21,403 posts)

2. It sounds like a right wing talking point

Reply to Bernardo de La Paz (Original post)

Wed Nov 16, 2022, 04:13 PM

Nov 2022

re: classified documents.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,036 posts)

3. Just thought of: might be the dropping of Espionage case & pursuing Gov Papers & Obstruction cases

Reply to Bernardo de La Paz (Original post)

Wed Nov 16, 2022, 04:19 PM

Nov 2022

Fits the RW modus operandi of willful misinterpretation, willful obfuscation, willful distortion, and willful distracting.

Irish_Dem

(47,390 posts)

6. I figure the DOJ will give Trump a pass on stealing classified docs.

Reply to Bernardo de La Paz (Reply #3)

Wed Nov 16, 2022, 06:18 PM

Nov 2022

And just make it a paperwork dispute with the national archives.

Princess Turandot

(4,787 posts)

4. Here you go..

Reply to Bernardo de La Paz (Original post)

Wed Nov 16, 2022, 04:21 PM

Nov 2022

https://www.google.com/search?q=%22NYT+announced+quietly+yesterday+that+no+incriminating+evidence+was+found%22&rlz=1CAPOUW_enUS982US982&oq=%22NYT+announced+quietly+yesterday+that+no+incriminating+evidence+was+found

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,036 posts)

5. Thanks but I thought my request was clear, for the NYT article in question

Reply to Princess Turandot (Reply #4)

Wed Nov 16, 2022, 04:59 PM

Nov 2022

Congratulations, you found the FReakrepublic post that I quoted because I saw it in the first place, hence my question probing deeper.

Reply to this discussion