Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsI am ok with a Special Investigator, but it should have been started sooner!
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
6 replies, 440 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (6)
ReplyReply to this post
6 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
I am ok with a Special Investigator, but it should have been started sooner! (Original Post)
imanamerican63
Nov 2022
OP
fightforfreedom
(4,913 posts)1. Garland explained that.
He said Trumps announcement he is now a candidate for president led him to appoint a special prosecutor. He said it was in the publics best interest.
imanamerican63
(13,820 posts)2. Ok, thanks! Just turned on the radio and didn't catch that part!
euphorb
(279 posts)4. That's part of it
Garland explained that the other part is that Biden has stated his intention to run again (though he hasn't formally announced yet).
GenXer47
(1,204 posts)3. Jack Smith eats corruption
and craps bald eagles!!!
William769
(55,148 posts)5. You just can't please everyone. nt
republianmushroom
(13,722 posts)6. 20 months