Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Takket

(21,578 posts)
Sun Nov 20, 2022, 10:02 PM Nov 2022

Should the Federal government formally replace "minimum wage" with a "living wage"?

With living wage being scientifically calculated

example: this site
https://livingwage.mit.edu/

And should there be any caveats to your wage?
Example: This site shows 1 person along, 2 adults with only 1 working, etc. Should the person living with another adult have to prove that adult is NOT working to be entitled to the higher wage?

What about persons that live with their parents for free? Should they get the same wage or should you have to prove you have a rent/mortgage to get the higher living wage?

What if you commute from an area with a small living wage to one with a large living wage? Should you get the benefit of the larger living wage if your expenses are much lower? And vice versa what if you living in a place with a large living wage, but commute to some place with a low one? You'd be getting screwed if they base your wage on where you work and not where you living.

I think everyone agrees that wages don't keep up with inflation, that's been going on since Reagan declared war on the middle class (and somehow convinced the country he was a great leader while doing it). And I also thing everyone agrees a living wage is the way to go (gets employers to pay instead taxpayers supplementing income for people that can't make ends meet even though they work).

But what should that piece of legislation actually look like?

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Should the Federal government formally replace "minimum wage" with a "living wage"? (Original Post) Takket Nov 2022 OP
No indication even democrats would take this on. brooklynite Nov 2022 #1
minmum wage is specific, living wage is too vague, depending on what kind of living u want nt msongs Nov 2022 #2
Well, that would mean wages are dependent on the geographic area, as NJ's adj. poverty is near $30K TheBlackAdder Nov 2022 #3
Need a maximum wage. multigraincracker Nov 2022 #4
Indeed! nt Wounded Bear Nov 2022 #5
Calculating a living wage for the instances the OP mentions can be done. brush Nov 2022 #6
$40 per hour should do it. MichMan Nov 2022 #7

brush

(53,792 posts)
6. Calculating a living wage for the instances the OP mentions can be done.
Sun Nov 20, 2022, 11:01 PM
Nov 2022

We have computers that can crunch those numbers. And we've had them all along we just haven't applied them to such a problem because the right/repubs would start screaming "socialism" on cue.

Our computers just sent a rocket to around to the other side of the moon, the first step in a mission for a settlement there. We got a new deep space telescope, we've done missions to all the planets, the space shuttles, our computers just crunched the numbers to nudged aside the orbit of an asteroid whose future path was coming to close to the earth for comfort.

Or course we can compute living wages for what situations come up.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Should the Federal govern...