General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsLament #2 about what's happening to the latest generation.
In the last few days I've gotten texts from each of my granddaughters, in reply to something I sent, that said "Loved your message " Their mother explained that they could set that to go out automatically if, for some reason, they couldn't/didn't want to respond to text messages. Perhaps they were in class or sick.
I can understand "Sorry, can't respond to texts right now." But to say "loved your message" just trashes real communication. It tells us not to believe anything they tell us. It can't be a good model. Right? Wrong?
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)Pretty sure text message auto-replies ranks several tens of thousands of issues down my list.
Bernardo de La Paz
(49,002 posts)WhiskeyGrinder
(22,356 posts)saw it and appreciated it, similar to a "like" on a tweet or a DU upvote. And if you don't have an OS that displays that heart message on the text bubble, you will get a message that says " (name) loved your message."
Why do you think "loved your message" doesn't have real sentiment behind it just because they didn't type each letter out?
Many, many people would love to have that level of communication with their grandkids.
ZonkerHarris
(24,229 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)TuxedoKat
(3,818 posts)One of my nieces rarely responds to messages.
RobinA
(9,893 posts)to you. It would make me feel crappy, too. They probably wouldn't be getting many messages from me after that.
blm
(113,063 posts)Thats a good thing. Everyone on my family threads does it when a message touches their heart.
question everything
(47,486 posts)thanking for the book, for example. If they read.
I don't understand the belittling responses here. If one think it is unimportant why not just skip and move to the next thread?