Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsMuch gratitude to DOJ prosecutors for their outstanding legal work re: Rhodes et al
...how it started:____Over roughly two hours, Assistant U.S. Attorney Kathryn Rakoczy walked the jury through some of the evidence text messages, videos and witness testimony presented over the past seven weeks and said it demonstrates a conspiracy to disrupt the peaceful transfer of power for the first time in American history.
"Our democracy is fragile. It cannot exist without respect for the rule of law," Rakoczy said. "And it will not survive if people who are dissatisfied with the result of an election can use force and violence to change the outcome. That is what these defendants did. They conspired to and did halt the transfer of power on Jan. 6."
"That is unacceptable," she said. "That is criminal."
"Two days after the presidential election," Rakoczy told jurors, "Mr. Rhodes called for war with all of its horrors and violence to oppose the results of a presidential election. Think about that."
"A mountain of evidence has shown that these five defendants joined together and agreed to do whatever necessary, up to and including the use of force, to stop the lawful transfer of power to Joe Biden," she said.
https://www.npr.org/2022/11/18/1137372415/oath-keepers-closing-arguments-jan-6-seditious-conspiracy-stewart-rhodes
__________________________________
These defendants repeatedly called for the violent overthrow of the United States government and they followed those words with action, Assistant U.S. Attorney Kathryn Rakoczy said in her closing statements. Please do not become numb to these statements. Think about what is actually being called for in these statements.
https://www.politico.com/news/2022/11/18/prosecutors-seditious-conspiracy-case-oath-keepers-00069405
...how it ended:
Brandi Buchman @Brandi_Buchman
Elmer Stewart Rhodes jury verdict by count:
GUILTY: seditious conspiracy
NOT GUILTY: conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding
GUILTY: obstruction of an official proceeding
NOT GUILTY: conspiracy to prevent an officer from discharging
GUILTY: Tampering with docs
Kelly Meggs jury verdicts
GUILTY: seditious conspiracy
GUILTY: Conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding
GUILTY: Obstruction of an official proceeding
GUILTY: Conspiracy to prevent officer from discharging duties
NOT GUILTY: Destruction govt property
GUILTY: Tampering w/docs
Kenneth Harrelson jury verdicts:
NOT GUILTY: seditious conspiracy
NOT GUILTY: Conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding
GUILTY: Obstruction of official proceeding
GUILTY: Conspiracy to prevent ofcr from doing duties
NOT GUILTY: Destruction of prop
GUILTY: Tampering w/docs
Jessica Watkins jury verdicts:
NOT GUILTY: Seditious conspiracy
GUILTY: Conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding
GUILTY: Obstruction of official proceeding
GUILTY: Conspiracy to prevent officer from doing duties
NOT GUILTY: Destruction govt property
GUILTY: Civil disorder
Thomas Caldwell jury verdicts per count:
NOT GUILTY: Seditious conspiracy
NOT GUILTY: Conspiracy to obstruct an official proceeding
GUILTY: Obstruction of an official proceeding
NOT GUILTY: Conspiracy to prevent an officer from discharging duties
GUILTY: Tampering with docs
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
10 replies, 655 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (14)
ReplyReply to this post
10 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Much gratitude to DOJ prosecutors for their outstanding legal work re: Rhodes et al (Original Post)
bigtree
Nov 2022
OP
underpants
(182,829 posts)1. Thanks for the recap.
cilla4progress
(24,736 posts)2. Do all the not guilties on the conspiracy charges
mean tfg will get off?
bigtree
(85,998 posts)4. Meggs was found guilty on conspiracy
...and Watkins.
The evidence against Trump may vary from what prosecutors used in these cases.
bigtree
(85,998 posts)9. loose thread
emptywheel @emptywheel 42m
Note that the guy found guilty on the most more serious charges, Kelly Meggs, is represented by the lawyer also representing some of Trump's key firewalls -- including Kash Patel and Walt Nauta.
twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1597720579934756864
Note that the guy found guilty on the most more serious charges, Kelly Meggs, is represented by the lawyer also representing some of Trump's key firewalls -- including Kash Patel and Walt Nauta.
twitter.com/emptywheel/status/1597720579934756864
uponit7771
(90,347 posts)3. This look like good verdicts
malaise
(269,054 posts)5. Great post
and thank the jurors too
bigtree
(85,998 posts)6. that's so right, dear Malaise
...I just said to my wife that this affirmed Americans won't stand for these insurrections of democracy.
Failure would have signaled a deeper malignacy than just these opportunistic politicians.
malaise
(269,054 posts)8. You are correct
This is a huge victory.
Elessar Zappa
(14,004 posts)7. Thank you, DOJ.
crickets
(25,981 posts)10. Yes. Big K&R. nt