General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsFalloutShelter
(11,850 posts)Love that!
Gonna use it.
FelineOverlord
(3,574 posts)Someone projected it onto Twitter HQ and hes been Space Karen ever since.
Link to tweet
Link to tweet
FalloutShelter
(11,850 posts)live love laugh
(13,100 posts)Musk bans them too.
Hiawatha Pete
(1,797 posts)dalton99a
(81,455 posts)uponit7771
(90,335 posts)FelineOverlord
(3,574 posts)Chautauquas
(4,440 posts)It's a swastika intertwined with a Star of David.
I_UndergroundPanther
(12,463 posts)Thats fucking disgusting.
FelineOverlord
(3,574 posts)Maru Kitteh
(28,339 posts)You can see clearly he's never worked.
Beetwasher.
(2,970 posts)I mean, yeah, it's entertaining as hell, but it's also frighteningly insane and I mean, holy shit, WTF is going on? Seriously?
Hortensis
(58,785 posts)Kennah
(14,256 posts)gab13by13
(21,312 posts)Stranger in a Strange land for the religious right.
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)When narcissistic assholes like Trump, Kanye, Musk, Fuentes, et al start eating each other its impossible to tell who to root for.
gratuitous
(82,849 posts)Although the combatants are already pretty debilitated.
But yeah, "free speech absolutist" Nome Skul is maybe not so absolute.
I_UndergroundPanther
(12,463 posts)To destroy each other. I hate narcissism and if they all go down the better.
dweller
(23,628 posts)Nevilledog posted this today:
https://johnganz.substack.com/p/what-is-even-happening
https://www.democraticunderground.com/100217427201
✌🏻
Beetwasher.
(2,970 posts)Good read!
3Hotdogs
(12,374 posts)Oh, how I wanted to be on that list.
niyad
(113,265 posts)Mad_Machine76
(24,406 posts)that you can't have a completely unlimited and unrestricted "free speech" platform because people like Ye will eventually start promoting the worst stuff like this and that the platform/owners starts feeling the heat of liability/complicity
Celerity
(43,328 posts)Hortensis
(58,785 posts)West was also on Infowars letting Jones, who's banned, tweet from his account.
I do find it a little bit hypocritical that Elon Musk said he was purchasing Twitter to create a free speech environment, Mr Fuentes, Wests 2024 presidential campaign adviser, added.
He says that free speech is the thing thats going to save the West and our civilization, but yet he has taken exception to you Alex for some seemingly specific reason, maybe personal to him but certainly not principled.
I'm not about to find myself agreeing with Fuentes and am at least comfortably sure we have extremely different ideas of what "principled" means.
KewlKat
(5,624 posts)the faux run in 24, etc...wouldn't doubt the two of them are in this media control blitz together.
suegeo
(2,573 posts)I read somewhere that they are like pro-wrestlers. None of the feuds are real, just entertainment.
This is bad entertainment, but I have little doubt they are up to something no good.
onecaliberal
(32,826 posts)dlk
(11,558 posts)In many ways, its the opposite.
Ford_Prefect
(7,891 posts)gab13by13
(21,312 posts)that there is the suggestion that wealthy anti-democratic people across the globe wanted to bring Twitter down.
Twitter, like it or not, is a very powerful communication tool.
Fiendish Thingy
(15,585 posts)Only that his account has been suspended in response to the swastika tweet.
hibbing
(10,097 posts)He'll get hype from this for a few days, get a lot of traffic, then let him back on, rinse and repeat.
Peace
twodogsbarking
(9,734 posts)Warpy
(111,245 posts)when you apply it to the real world. Oh, it looks great on paper, at least to unsophisticated people, and espouses lofty ideals, but like so many new paradigms dreamed up by ivory tower types, it fails miserably in practice.
The sun is also beginning to set on it as any sort of viable paradigm, it has failed miserably in Honduras, Iraq, Russia, and anywhere else a bunch of theorists have gone in to try it out.
You know, just like we old lefties told them it would.
I_UndergroundPanther
(12,463 posts)People stopped thinking Ayn Rand was a "philosopher" she's just an asshole.
Warpy
(111,245 posts)I actually finished "Atlas Shrugged" because I wanted to see where the silly plot line went. I confess I skipped most of the polemics that she substituted for rational conversation. I can't for the life of me remember how that thing ended, only the sense of relief I felt when it did and I could go on to something a little less psychotic.
I_UndergroundPanther
(12,463 posts)Nausea would force me to stop.
Sometimes I get visceral reactions to what I read. A course in miracles was the worst. It pissed me off and made me feel ill. I figured go ahead and read it and use it to counter the bullshit believers may toss around.
Warpy
(111,245 posts)I had already kicked and clawed my way through Marx and Rand's crap was lighter reading than that. I did skip the idiotic sermonizing after the first couple of ten page screeds. I hated her premise, I hated her cardboard cutout characters, and I was only in it for the plot, which I did find somewhat entertaining in an alternate universe sort of way (new steel? Really? No testing for tensile strength, brittleness, deformity under load? My mother was a metallurgist, I knew better than that even if Rand didn't).
A classmate, a know it all kid from NYC, thought I was going down the rabbit hole since I was obviously finishing the book. I pronounced it a massive load of bollocks and made a fast friend.