Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
8 replies, 1060 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (10)
ReplyReply to this post
8 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
At least 18 women will serve in the Senate starting in 2013 n/t (Original Post)
riverwalker
Nov 2012
OP
Luminous Animal
(27,310 posts)1. We've come a long way baby...
Not.
ismnotwasm
(42,008 posts)2. Right on
DreamGypsy
(2,252 posts)3. Proud to be the first one to REC this post, but ...
I won't be satisfied until I see the post: At least 50 women will serve in the Senate starting in 2033.
Earlier than that would be OK, too.
llmart
(15,552 posts)8. I'm going to rec your post.....
I feel the same. We shouldn't be happy with less than 50.
Brother Buzz
(36,463 posts)4. Still not enough, but it works for me
dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)5. Tis a good start.
Maybe there will be more in 2 years when the other Senate seats are up for grabs.
barbtries
(28,811 posts)6. out of 100
it should be more, but it's better than 17. i don't know the history - does this make a record?
Barack_America
(28,876 posts)7. Now THAT is legitimate!!