Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

ProSense

(116,464 posts)
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 01:56 PM Nov 2012

Krugman: Wall Street’s Bad Investment Decision

Wall Street’s Bad Investment Decision

There are many lists now circulating of the biggest winners and losers from the election; oddly, however, none of the lists I’ve seen mentions just how bad this result is for Wall Street’s Masters of the Universe.

The story, as you may recall, is that the financial industry — having brought both itself and the rest of the world to the edge of disaster — was bailed out by taxpayers. Yet far from being grateful, top financial types were furious at Obama for occasionally hinting that some of them might have misbehaved a bit. And investment bankers — who normally lean Democratic — went overwhelmingly to the other side, pouring cash into Mitt Romney’s coffers in the no doubt correct expectation that a Romney administration would dismantle financial reform and treat their wealth with the adulation they believe to be their birthright.

But Romney lost and Obama won. The limits of their power have been cruelly exposed, and the reelected president now owes them nothing. Did I mention that Elizabeth Warren is going to the Senate — a Senate that will be substantially more progressive and less Wall Street friendly than before?

Bad move, guys.

http://krugman.blogs.nytimes.com/2012/11/07/wall-streets-bad-investment-decision/


9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Krugman: Wall Street’s Bad Investment Decision (Original Post) ProSense Nov 2012 OP
Clinton tapped into the Wall St $$$ machine thru Rubin. Obama did the same the first time and byeya Nov 2012 #1
I've been thinking about this for weeks now... Sekhmets Daughter Nov 2012 #2
They're having a hissy fit on Wall St. today flamingdem Nov 2012 #3
Quick said that the selloff had a lot more to do with Europe than the election. Squinch Nov 2012 #5
Yup, and ProSense Nov 2012 #6
And how is this legal? TRJuan Nov 2012 #4
K&R. n/t Egalitarian Thug Nov 2012 #7
K&R and Welcome back. n/t FSogol Nov 2012 #8
Seemed rather an ungrateful attitude too. bemildred Nov 2012 #9
 

byeya

(2,842 posts)
1. Clinton tapped into the Wall St $$$ machine thru Rubin. Obama did the same the first time and
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 01:59 PM
Nov 2012

got stabbed in the back the second.

Let's hope the President learned something and will unlock the door to the antitrust division of the DOJ and get an AG that will prosecute the Wall St crimes...finally.

Sekhmets Daughter

(7,515 posts)
2. I've been thinking about this for weeks now...
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 02:00 PM
Nov 2012

Just how sorry would the bankers be and how scared? Normally they hedge their presidential bets, quietly to be sure, but hedged all the same. Not so this time. I hope they have countless sleepless nights waiting for the axe to fall.

Squinch

(51,007 posts)
5. Quick said that the selloff had a lot more to do with Europe than the election.
Wed Nov 7, 2012, 02:14 PM
Nov 2012

SHe's probably right. They bitch and moan, but they know they have done well under this president. S&P up 18% per year under him.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Krugman: Wall Street’s Ba...