This Supreme Court case could devastate workers' right to strike. If wealthy corporations get their

[Celerity]

way, companies would be able to sue workers for the cost of a strike — like spoiled food, lost revenue, and more.

It would be a massive setback for the working class.

Link to tweet

CASE PREVIEW

Cement-truck drivers went on strike. A lawsuit by their company may pave the way for restricting workers’ rights.

https://www.scotusblog.com/2023/01/cement-truck-drivers-went-on-strike-a-lawsuit-by-their-company-may-pave-the-way-for-restricting-workers-rights/

Striketober. Starbucks walkouts. Work stoppages at iconic companies like John Deere, The New York Times, and Kellogg’s. The number of labor disputes resulting in strikes and the attention paid to those strikes has increased over the past few years. That is why the Supreme Court’s decision to review a basic feature of how the law may or may not interfere in work stoppages is noteworthy.

The case, Glacier Northwest v. International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Local Union 174, will be argued on Tuesday. Here are the facts: Workers who drive cement mixers grew frustrated with the pace of bargaining with their employer, Glacier Northwest, a ready-mix concrete company in Seattle. So the drivers decided to go out on strike. Drivers reported for work and those with early runs had their trucks loaded with cement. At the appointed hour for the onset of the strike, the drivers drove their trucks back to the company’s headquarters and walked off the job. For those whose trucks had already been loaded with cement but who had not yet made deliveries, they left their trucks running so the cement wouldn’t instantly harden inside the trucks’ drums. The company, however, was unable to deliver the cement and some of it hardened, requiring it be destroyed and carted away. The strike lasted one week before the parties reached agreement on a new contract.

The issue in this case revolves around what happened next: Glacier sued the Teamsters Union, which represents the drivers, for “tortious destruction” of the company’s property. Glacier asked a Washington state court to make the Teamsters pay for damage that happened when cement hardened after the strike began. The company alleged that the Teamsters chose to start the strike after cement had been loaded into trucks because it would cost money to deal with undelivered cement. The Washington Supreme Court dismissed the case, finding that it wasn’t appropriate to apply state tort law to a labor dispute covered by a federal law, the National Labor Relations Act.

The Teamsters filed an unfair labor practice charge with the National Labor Relations Board, alleging that Glacier filed the tort action in retaliation for workers striking. The NLRB general counsel issued a complaint, finding merit to the Teamsters’ allegation. That case is still pending at the NLRB.

snip

[aocommunalpunch]

1. Keep making people's lives untenable in this country

When the pressure bursts, their flex will, too. It will be ugly.

[maxrandb]

2. The only problem with this story is the use of the word "if"

Anyone who thinks the 6 Justices of the Supreme Court of the Confederate States will not rule as the corporations want them to is delusional.

I am surprised that a case authorizing reparations for the former slave owning states for damages from the Civil War hasn't made it to their docket yet.

[scarletlib]

3. Back to the "good old days" of the the Gilded Age when you could work 16 hours day .

Benefits included a pittance for a wage, no health or safety regulations, no sick days etc.

[localroger]

4. Sorry but this was not a strike, it was sabotage

Look, if you work with concrete you know what will happen if you leave it in the truck too long. If it's your intention to walk off the job you don't get the truck loaded and then leave it parked. I am a working stiff myself but I have no sympathy for these assholes. They deliberately caused tens of thousands of dollars in damage.