Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News Editorials & Other Articles General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Celerity

(50,958 posts)
Sat Apr 29, 2023, 07:19 PM Apr 2023

Failed Market Approaches to Long-Term Care

The interests of care workers should be aligned with those of service users. The interests of corporate owners of care homes are however aligned with those of their shareholders. In this Social Europe research essay, supported by the European Federation of Public Service Unions and Public Services International, Jason Ward of the Centre for International Corporate Tax Accountability and Research documents the shocking results of privatisation of social care around the world. Public funds have been siphoned off into profits sequestered in secrecy jurisdictions, at the expense of care workers and service quality. Public ownership represents the urgently needed alternative.



https://www.socialeurope.eu/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Ward-RE13.pdf

Abstract

In countries where responsibility for long-term care of a growing elderly population has shifted significantly to the private sector, expectations of quality of service and standards of care are not being realised. This essay draws on prior research, analyses and case studies from Australia, Canada, the United Kingdom, France and the United States.

Employment in longterm care has been growing but its largely female, often migrant, workforce has been subject to severe exploitation. High turnover and chronic staff shortages are exacerbated by low wages and excessive workloads, undermining the quality of care. Rather than funding improvements, private operators of long-term care regularly extract excessive revenues from public funding and private fees.

This pattern is common across ownership types: private equity, private business, public company and large-scale not-for-profit. In almost all cases, private operators put business interests—profits or expansion—ahead of quality of care. Government regulation has been largely insufficient to maintain acceptable standards but some reform efforts are beginning to emerge.

Greater worker participation and engagement with public health systems and communities must be part of the solution, to ensure higher quality, address chronic staff shortages and build public support for adequate, fair and transparent public funding. Further reforms and future funding increases should prioritise direct public provision, to ensure adequate standards and reduce profit extraction by private operators.

snip

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Failed Market Approaches ...