General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsPaula Broadwell 'leaked secret details of Benghazi probe during speech'
Paula Broadwell 'leaked secret details of Benghazi probe during speech' as it emerges Petraeus' testimony will be postponed
Former CIA director's alleged mistress talked about Libya at college lecture
Paula Broadwell, the author of General David Petraeus' biography, is widely thought to be the alleged mistress that caused Petraeus to resign
Broadwell said there were Libyan prisoners in American consulate at the time of the September 11 attack that left four dead including ambassador
Petraeus was scheduled to testify to Congress about timeline on Thursday
Now his replacement will fill in, but he may still be forced to talk
By Meghan Keneally and Lydia Warren
PUBLISHED:08:51 EST, 12 November 2012| UPDATED: 09:47 EST, 12 November 2012
Comments (1)
Share
.
.
Questions have emerged over whether David Petraeus' mistress leaked details of the CIA's investigation into the deadly attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi.
Suspicions over how much Paula Broadwell knew about the probe come as the CIA's former boss stepped down on Friday over the alleged affair, days before he was to testify in the investigation.
Officials say they expect he will still testify over the incident, which left four Americans dead on September 11 this year, yet it will be delayed. The new concern comes over what, if any, confidential information he shared with his biographer and alleged mistress.
SCROLL DOWN FOR VIDEO
Close: Paula Broadwell is thought to be David Petraeus' mistress and she spoke publicly about the government's handling on the attack on the Libyan embassy
Broadwell, a married army veteran who met Petraeus in 2006, was speaking at the University of Denver on October 26 when she was asked about the attack.
'Now I dont know if a lot of you heard this, but the CIA annex had actually - had taken a couple of Libyan militia members prisoner and they think that the attack on the consulate was an effort to try to get these prisoners back,' she said, according to the Daily Beast. 'So that's still being vetted.'
In response, the CIA denied that claim on Sunday when the tape of Broadwell's talk surfaced, saying that it was not true. The agency confirmed that since 2009 they have not had the authority to detain prisoners.
Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2231734/David-Petraeus-scandal-Paula-Broadwell-leaked-secret-details-Benghazi-probe-speech-emerges-Petraeus-testify-hearing.html#ixzz2C1NOimiw
Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook
warrior1
(12,325 posts)like about four month before? So if this is true, was it Petraeus that would be the leak. Stupid.
gordianot
(15,238 posts)If involved stay off of small planes, slick roads write a confession give it to your lawyer. Also silence in charging the President personally or Pre election coverage on Fox News indicates something is seriously wrong with the whole episode.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Doesn't that explain the attack then? Presumably it was to free them (then the Ambassador would have been unintended collateral damage).
Furthermore, when did ANY US consulate become a jailing facility???
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)was a temporary facility but I suspect the CIA annex was permanent.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)(or a rendition site??) I can't imagine the international ramifications of the US consulates and embassies being exposed as secret detention centers.
Broadwell's release of this info is incredibly relevant to the events in Benghazi (and most likely an enormous breach of confidentiality).
But it would completely explain why that particular location was targeted.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)The President didn't want to put boots on the ground in Libya. So, the CIA went in to work its "magic." The CIA was probably using that place to question Qaddafi supporters/terrorists and the Libyans knew of this (this goes back to the list of Libyans that were working with US leaked by Issa and the article below talking about finding shoulder-fired missiles).
I had read somewhere that the house that Stevens was at was a temporary "consulate." The CIA annex was about a mile away. So, if they were indeed trying to free detainees, they hit the wrong building.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2012/10/11/usa-libya-annex-idUSL1E8L9E1220121011
Bandit
(21,475 posts)I think we had Blackwater personel in Libya because we didn't want Government forces on the ground there...
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)and additional manpower since the Bush admin. It's not surprising that those guarding Stevens or those that were killed were contractors--it's debatable whether that is wise but that's a whole other thing. The CIA annex and the temporary consulate were roughly a mile apart from one another. It was the CIA that went into the consulate to fight off and rescue the others there.
I think this still has more to do with the CIA than anyone is or can talk about.
marlakay
(11,468 posts)The main CIA guy who went to Iran to take the 6 people out, if you get caught we will deny we even know you. And this is true story from our CIA past.
Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)>>>snip
The CIA's super-secret rendition program--to whisk terrorist suspects in the dark of night to CIA black sites for interrogation--has been further exposed to the light of day in rather humble fashion: a billing dispute in upstate New York.
sammytko
(2,480 posts)Did they get out alive?
This woman is a whole bowl of fruit loop crazy!! Making up stuff just for attention or she really needs to get medical attention.
Just the fact that she took off to Afghanistan while she had infants at home is suspect. Yes, women go when IRS their duty, but she pulled strings to go see her lover.
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)It would explain a LOT.
Horse with no Name
(33,956 posts)especially in a consulate in Libya...
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)in the chaos following the event.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)How would it free them?
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)after the event.
Who the hell knows what was left to see by then.
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)That would be a whole other level of bad shit....
Regardless, it would explain the attack. It would also explain why the US didn't want extra security there, so they didn't draw attention to THAT site so it didn't look like a jail/detention (rendition?!) facility.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)misteress?
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)We are subconsciously more accepting of his adultery, and more inclined to harsh judgment of her adultery.
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)lol
thanks
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)Why aren't we talking about Broadwell being charged with adultery under the UCMJ? Why are we only referring to Petraeus being charged, and Broadwell's always referred to as the "mistress"?
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)i think about a year ago i read it is harsher on the woman. even if she is under.... ha ha, ya.... him. lol
elehhhhna
(32,076 posts)lol
seabeyond
(110,159 posts)magical thyme
(14,881 posts)And she referenced the Fox news broadcast earlier in her talk, so she *may* have been confusing their report in her memory. Or not. For all we know, she may have been the source for Fox, versus their making it up from scratch.
I'm also interested in knowing just what secret documents were found on her computer and how they got there.
flamingdem
(39,313 posts)and the documents on the computer seemed to be unrelated - she was a writer it could have been research, we'll see
riderinthestorm
(23,272 posts)It will be interesting if the documents on her computer are legit. Or if they are items she shouldn't have had.
Regardless, I believe Broadwell's in a lot of trouble. I hadn't heard that Fox had a report about the Libyan facility being a detention center. Why haven't the Freepers "heard" this then if their news station's put it out there? It explains WHY it was attacked (to free their Libyan friends), it also explains why the Ambassador wasn't the target (which has been repeated ad nauseum - a point they never seem to get).
aletier_v
(1,773 posts)more motivation.
they see it as a means to nullify the election.
magical thyme
(14,881 posts)(Its possible Broadwell was confusing details broadcast ealier that day by Fox News correspondent Jennifer Griffen, whod reported that three of the Libyan attackers were briefly held at the annexnot the consulatebefore being turned over to a local militia.)
ronnie624
(5,764 posts)she says "the CIA annex had taken a couple of Libyan militia members prisoner, and they think that the attack on the consulate was an effort to try to get these prisoners back".
I don't think she was confusing details.
Coyotl
(15,262 posts)Let me guess, they plagiarized Fox
wishlist
(2,795 posts)I have yet to hear any more about the ten Libyan 'police' allegedly killed according to early news reports on CNN and other media during the Benghazi attack. Later reporting only mentioned the four Americans. And it took quite a while for the possible CIA connections to be reported but because of CIA involvement, the truth will probably never come out fully.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)by the FBI for possessing classified material, for having an affair with the CIA director, and yet publicly speaks on Libya and the CIA's role. You would think she would have laid low for a while, right? Why is she talking about Benghazi at all?
lanlady
(7,134 posts)that she publicly disclosed classified tidbits at a conference last October where she was a keynote speaker. He thinks there's a big shitstorm coming at her.