Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWildfire smoke 'supports nuclear winter theory' (2019 article)
"Scientists studying wildfire-triggered thunderstorms have confirmed an important element of a nuclear winter theory championed by Carl Sagan all the way back in the early 1980s.
Sagan and a team of atmospheric scientists proposed that along with radiation and blast damage, a nuclear war would create enormous firestorms in cities struck by large bombs.
These would be so intense that they would inject smoke not just into the lower atmosphere, where it would eventually be removed by rainfall, but all the way into the stratosphere, where it would linger for years, block sunlight, and plunge much of the world into an extended, deadly cold snap.
Even a relatively limited nuclear exchange such as a war between India and Pakistan could affect regions far removed from the combat."
.........
Studies have shown that such smoke would cause global temperatures to plummet, creating risks of global famine.
https://cosmosmagazine.com/earth/earth-sciences/wildfire-smoke-supports-nuclear-winter-theory/
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
12 replies, 570 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (9)
ReplyReply to this post
12 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Wildfire smoke 'supports nuclear winter theory' (2019 article) (Original Post)
orangecrush
Jun 2023
OP
We have that here in Delaware and South Jersey sometimes. Call them marsh fires.
Walleye
Jun 2023
#10
roamer65
(36,745 posts)1. Mount Tambora, 1815.
FSogol
(45,484 posts)3. You beat me too it. And every other major eruption. n/t
Walleye
(31,017 posts)8. Thank you, I was searching back in my mind for that one
MutantAndProud
(736 posts)2. Sadly, sometimes it takes multiple states' skies turning orange
For the dumbasses to understand the reality of gas smoke and particulate distribution
JCMach1
(27,556 posts)4. A bit of smoke in NYC and just like that: it's the end.of the world
LOL
orangecrush
(19,547 posts)5. I'm 400 miles from NYC
And there is a grey curtain of smoke.
JCMach1
(27,556 posts)7. Quite normal for places that have regular forest fires...
Lived in an area of Florida with forest and swamp/muck fires.
Muck (think peat bog) can burn for weeks/months.
I am sure other wildfire prone areas are also quite familiar with these conditions.
It's just national media inhabit NYC and don't get out much.
Walleye
(31,017 posts)10. We have that here in Delaware and South Jersey sometimes. Call them marsh fires.
Thick black smoke
Qutzupalotl
(14,307 posts)6. Wow, did you miss the point.
JCMach1
(27,556 posts)9. Nuclear Winter is one thing... Overreaction and hyperbole about forest fire smoke
Is quite another.
Nah, no points missed here, thanks.
Qutzupalotl
(14,307 posts)11. They aren't saying forest fires cause nuclear winter.
They're saying studying smoke patterns supports the theory of nuclear winter after a nuclear explosion again, not after a forest fire.
edhopper
(33,575 posts)12. It is affecting
50 million people and is the worst air in decades. Not a little smoke.