General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsOcelot II
(115,683 posts)gab13by13
(21,323 posts)agingdem
(7,849 posts)once the GOP narrowly took the House (midterms 2022) Garland had to insulate the two investigations (J6 and MAL classified document) from MAGA sewer rats Jim Jordan/Kevin McCarthy...enter Jack Smith..
enough
(13,259 posts)Ocelot II
(115,683 posts)Takket
(21,563 posts)mcar
(42,307 posts)But I appreciate this, bc I know some won't believe it.
Celerity
(43,341 posts)Autumn
(45,066 posts)JuJuChen
(2,215 posts)we can do it
(12,184 posts)W_HAMILTON
(7,864 posts)Celerity
(43,341 posts)Marius25
(3,213 posts)Ocelot II
(115,683 posts)says that the AG can veto a decision to prosecute only if he concludes it's completely out of bounds, and that he does not have to affirmatively approve it. Weissman and Katyal said it was done this way in order to insulate the AG and the Biden administration from accusations of a politically-motivated prosecution, since Smith isn't a political appointee, just an ordinary nonpartisan government employee.
Marius25
(3,213 posts)of it being politically motivated.
Ocelot II
(115,683 posts)and truthfully say they didn't have anything to do with it.
BumRushDaShow
(128,909 posts)Basically Garland (and Lisa Monaco) have insulated themselves from Jack Smith's investigation where it did not need a "sign off" by them but could have gotten a "disapproval" to block it if necessary, but wasn't.
obnoxiousdrunk
(2,910 posts)Please edit.