General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsUK man arrested for posting burning poppy picture on Facebook
A teenager arrested on Remembrance Sunday on suspicion of posting a picture of a burning poppy on Facebook is being questioned by police.
The 19-year-old was held after the image of a poppy being set ablaze by a lighter was reportedly posted online with the caption: "How about that you squadey cunts".
...
Jamie's Pants, under @thisisrjg, tweeted: "We do not have a right to not be offended. We certainly don't have a right to lock up someone for offending some people," while Thom Lumley, tweeting as @Hotstepperrr, wrote: "Dear idiots at Kent Police, burning a poppy may be obnoxious, but it is not a criminal offence."
David Allen Green, a journalist and lawyer for the New Statesman, tweeting as Jack of Kent, wrote: "What was the point of winning either World War if, in 2012, someone can be casually arrested by Kent Police for burning a poppy?"
Poppies are the symbol of Remembrance/Armistice/Vet's day in Europe; yes it's offensive as hell, but...really? Stay classy, UK.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2012/nov/12/teenager-arrested-burning-poppy-facebook
msongs
(67,406 posts)loli phabay
(5,580 posts)redqueen
(115,103 posts)I just try to keep my mouth shut and my head down. This teenager hasn't learned that lesson but he's on the way.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Bandit
(21,475 posts)To Flander's Fields the Hippies go to "Feed their Heads" ~ Guess Who
Mec9000
(51 posts)loli phabay
(5,580 posts)It covers parts of belguim and france
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Well, maybe in the Southern Hemisphere.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Its actually a very good symbol.
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)I have that type of poppy naturalized in my yard. On Memorial Day they're usually past their prime but still blooming.
People typically hand out plastic or silk replica flowers for Memorial Day. What I find odd is that they do the same thing for Veteran's Day (or Remembrance Day as it's called in some countries.) In November there is no trace of any kind of annual poppy plant visible.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)slackmaster
(60,567 posts)Veteran's Day dates back only to 1954.
I regard it as a very solemn occasion.
moxie.lu
(22 posts)since 1920 it has been used to remember fallen soldiers, so burning it is seen as really offensive.....
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)... Poppies as a remembrance emblem are probably the single most sacrosanct symbol in the entire Commonwealth.
Stuff like this is pretty much the single most guaranteed way to cause offense to as many people as possible in most of the member countries. If someone's seeking a reaction, like this dolt was, that's an easy way to do it, while also unhinging people enough to overreact in the process.
sir pball
(4,742 posts)..it could blot out the sun. And I don't think there should be any legal repercussions.
An angry infantry company with bars of soap in towels in the other hand...never said speech shouldn't have consequences
At work, signing off for a while.
Posteritatis
(18,807 posts)I usually have a "meh" reaction to people being deliberately offensive for its own sake, but this reflexively pissed me right off. It's one of those You Don't Do That Goddammit things up here, at least socially, but social YDDTG things and legal YDDTG things aren't necessarily one and the same of course.
sir pball
(4,742 posts)YDDTG is a great acronym, I'm going to adopt it.
Yeah, legally, well, no speech or expression should be YDDTG but like I said...soap wrapped up in a towel won't cause permanent damage, so DON'T DO THAT GODDAMNIT
sir pball
(4,742 posts)I don't like war, I don't like kids dying in wars, and I'm not a big fan of war in general...funny that WWI was the same petty political squabbling that made wars up till then and then seem petty until a couple of these things happened.
And then there was a lot of legitimate crap that led to that whole concept of total war that ended up with that fight that killed a LOT of people. And then we went to proxy-ass (I blame BOTH SIDES EQUALLY) wars that [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vietnam_war|killed] well, a SHITLOAD of American boys. And now we're back to the petty geopolitcal squabbles that make us fight and die...and I really just wish we grew Flanders Field, for WWII and beyond...imagine so many more acres of poppies. A vast field of lost humanity. Maybe then we'd learn.
sir pball
(4,742 posts)backscatter712
(26,355 posts)So burning a poppy in the UK on Armistice Day is right up there with burning a flag, as far as offensiveness.
That said, arresting and jailing someone for doing that is not cool.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Turborama
(22,109 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Last edited Mon Nov 12, 2012, 04:21 PM - Edit history (1)
Doesn't need to be explicit.
The guy who. is the subject of the OP is an idiot. I've no doubt he will subsequently need police protection.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)Squaddies look on this shit very badly
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Last edited Mon Nov 12, 2012, 04:09 PM - Edit history (1)
to remove association.And one night he will hear someone say "hello sunshine : we understand you like hospital food......"
He may have the EDF to contend with too.
Turborama
(22,109 posts)"This idiotic arrest is the logical outcome of laws banning Koran desecration."
As if there is a law in the UK singling out desecration of the Koran.
They are singling out the Koran as getting special treatment when it shouldn't, because "the logical conclusion" is it will result in occaisions like this.
IOW Ban the ban on arseholes burning the Koran to stop arseholes getting arrested for burning a poppy.
The "logical conclusion" I got from it, this is another arsehole burning something that's very important and special to a lot of people just to make them pissed off and very angry.
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)she fell into the trap. of drawing comparisons between the US and the UK.
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)Turborama
(22,109 posts)So, no specific "laws banning Koran desecration", then.
Just "inciting religious hatred".
This idiotic arrest is the logical outcome of laws against inciting religious hatred?
snagglepuss
(12,704 posts)is a set of beliefs.
Turborama
(22,109 posts)It's not known for sure whether he hates Muslims or not, granted.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)Berlum
(7,044 posts)B2G
(9,766 posts)thank god that wasn't the case.
that said, WTF??
merrily
(45,251 posts)In my defense, I posted on the Grover Norquist poopyhead thread not long ago. '
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)Better clean my glasses.
merrily
(45,251 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts).
merrily
(45,251 posts)Disrespecting veterans is a gateway to being anti-war.
Then again, maybe the arrest was for posting "squadey cunts," whatever that means.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)Thanks for the info.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)loli phabay
(5,580 posts)truebrit71
(20,805 posts)....and should have been left alone...what the Kent Police did was way out of line but sadly a logical extension of the erosion of "free speech" that the UK has suffered...
When the former England and Chelsea skipper John Terry was convicted of racially abusing a fellow black footballer by calling him a "stupid black cunt" I said it was a very sad day for England. Not least of which because if the shoe was on the other foot and John Terry had been called a "stupid white cunt" no-one would have batted an eye-lid...
The Brits (me among them) have always said that an un-written constitution is better than a written one, because it can adjust with the times...unfortunately this example shows why a written constitution would be very handy indeed...
merrily
(45,251 posts)would have batted an eyelid."
In the U.S. statements along those lines have raised many eyebrows, especially on the right, but also on the left.
Are you certain a statement like that would not result in a single batted eyelid in the UK?
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts).
merrily
(45,251 posts)dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)than the couplet. I've no concept of why it should.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)stevenleser
(32,886 posts)I was sitting in a Scottish bar one day (Scottish themed and mostly Scottish patrons elsewhere in Europe, not in Scottland), when one person (male) at a table loudly and drunkenly referred to a female member at his table as that word (actually, full reference was you "Fockin Scottish C--t" his table started laughing, including the lady at which it was directed, and the rest of the bar went on like nothing happened, while I nearly fell off of my stool in shock.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)merrily
(45,251 posts)In the U.S. there would have been an outcry about racism against whites. Joe Scarborough alone would have worn our ears out over it.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)..The entire episode was ridiculous from start to finish...
Spider Jerusalem
(21,786 posts)They would've called him just "stupid cunt". Race wouldn't have entered into it. So yeah, Terry's comment had a racist undertone. He shouldn't have gone to court over it, though.
truebrit71
(20,805 posts)Calling John Terry a 'stupid cunt' simply points out the most obvious thing about him, he's as thick as a brick. Terry calling a black man a "black cunt" merely points out the most obvious thing about him...unless it was news to Anton Ferdinand that he is indeed, black. Calling an overweight guy a "fat cunt" is not Fat-ism or fat-ist, so the whole 'racist overtones' doesn't enter into it imho..
I full agree on your last point, as the not guilty verdict after a five-day trial proved, no, it shouldn't have gone to court..
Nye Bevan
(25,406 posts)is that it is not much of a leap from here to arresting people for using rude words to describe the Prime Minister.
The First Amendment is a beautiful, wonderful thing.
maxsolomon
(33,345 posts)Like, he posted the equivalent of himself smoking Opium...
merrily
(45,251 posts)Blue_Tires
(55,445 posts)Brighton Left
(3 posts)The police love to cut down on social network controversy because it's easy to pursue. Read more about the poppy issue on Brighton Left. com the blog for UK liberals [link:http://brightonleft.org.uk/?p=149|
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)I promise to take the piss out of your link whenever I get the opportunity.
Generic Other
(28,979 posts)so now the you can be arrested for offending dead people by burning flowers.
While the generals and captains of industry who killed them walk free. Who paid them low wages and stole from them their daily bread. Who tricked them and followed them. Who ignored their pleas for help. Who sent them to war. Who killed them in war. Who starved their widows and children.
Where have all the flowers gone? Burned to ashes every one.
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)This is a very disrespecful act. Dont agree with the arrest but if i was him i would apoligise as the squaddies will be gunning for him.
WinkyDink
(51,311 posts)that "squaddies" will become murderers over a match taken to a flower? Are the squaddies you know all this insane?
loli phabay
(5,580 posts)They would give him a kicking.
sir pball
(4,742 posts)Also, one that he should suffer. The police would be well to leave this alone, barring permanent injury (as I've said, soap in a towel is great).
tama
(9,137 posts)sir pball
(4,742 posts)Hey, it's not like I'm wishing harm on the kid. Just a painful lesson about Not Being A Dick. I'm not the only one, either..
tama
(9,137 posts)can be very educational to all of us. Especially if you find the strength to learn from the experience and express gratitude for your teachers. It's all part of the healing process...
Quantess
(27,630 posts)muslims freaking out over someone drawing a caricature of Mohammed?
Okay, there are differences, but, I am just saying I see the similarities.
Bucky
(54,013 posts)geardaddy
(24,931 posts)BainsBane
(53,032 posts)and I am thankful for our First Amendment. What would Americans do without the constitutional right to be assholes? I'm only half kidding. If one believes in free speech, it means tolerating offense. You can always tell them what jerks they are.