General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsRuling in Alabama case could boost suits increasing Black voters' power in other states
In one sense, the Supreme Courts surprise ruling striking down Alabamas 2022 congressional maps maintains the legal status quo. By 5-4, the justices rejected the states attempt to restrict the ability of the Voting Rights Act to block gerrymanders that suppress the power of minority voters.
But that dramatically understates the impact of the case, titled Allen v. Milligan, election law experts say.
Though it simply reaffirms existing law, the ruling authored by Chief Justice John Roberts, who was joined by Justices Elena Kagan, Sonia Sotomayor, and Ketanji Brown Jackson, and, in part, by Justice Brett Kavanaugh is likely to provide a major boost to lawsuits challenging racial gerrymanders from Georgia to Washington state.
That could help Democrats in the battle for control of the U.S. House and state legislatures in the 2024 election. A top political analyst cited the ruling in shifting five House seats in the partys direction, four of the five moving to toss-ups.
And, at a time when civil rights groups are warning that the political power of racial minorities is under threat in some areas, the ruling could lead to the creation of more U.S. House districts across the country where Black and brown voters hold a majority.
https://www.newsfromthestates.com/article/ruling-alabama-case-could-boost-suits-increasing-black-voters-power-other-states
MichMan
(11,919 posts)RandySF
(58,799 posts)MichMan
(11,919 posts)Is there a certain percentage that makes it packing vs creating majority minority districts? Not enough Black voters violates the VRA, but too many also violates it?
Great ruling, but I'm glad I dont have to figure out how to draw them.