General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsSo, Holder knew about Petraeus in "late summer" eh?
according to freepers quoting the WSJ
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424127887324073504578113460852395852.html
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)The question is why didn't the Director of the FBI tell Holder and Clapper - D.N.I.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)according to that article.
And Di Fi was not told at all -- she had to call Petraeus when the media started asking her for comment.
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)Congressman Rogers (head of House Intelligence Committee) was fully briefed by FBI before the WH was told. Why was he read in and his counterpart in the Senate was not and why was he told before the D.N.I ?
I think the FBI was clearly playing politics and Dir. Mueller needs to be removed.
justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)However, I wonder if there are two separate instances that are being conflated into one by WSJ.
From early June:
Attorney General Eric Holder said on Friday he had assigned two U.S. attorneys to lead investigations into the possible leaking of state secrets.
"The unauthorized disclosure of classified information can compromise the security of this country and all Americans, and it will not be tolerated," he said in a statement.
Holder assigned U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia Ronald C. Machen Jr., a Democratic appointee, and U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland Rod J. Rosenstein, a holdover GOP appointee, to lead the investigations.
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)justiceischeap
(14,040 posts)or else Holder knew "as far back as late Summer."
DURHAM D
(32,610 posts)It appears to have come off as a correction. Sorry, that was not my intent.
grasswire
(50,130 posts)Lots of dates and details.