General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsWill Obama nominate 2 more women to the Supreme Court?
If given the opportunity?
This will be a big positive from this election.
PDJane
(10,103 posts)MineralMan
(146,317 posts)More important is whether his appointees, when he gets a chance, be progressives in spirit.
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)lots of smoking hot porn.
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)The guy looks like exists solely on whole sides of beef, entire pies and lard.
Anthony McCarthy
(507 posts)but it would depend on which women. Judge Judy would be a big step up from the RATS+K five.
graham4anything
(11,464 posts)Eric Holder or Deval Patrick or if not to be, hope Hillary45 nominates Obama himself in 2017.
what an insult to have Clarence Thomas been the replcacemnt for Marshall.
PABigDaddyDemocrat
(56 posts)Above all I want to see sane judgement...progressive ideals are not even as important.
I don't think any of us want to see legislation from the bench but we have to quell the cycle of putting our people in there and then watching the next GOP executive (shiver) nominate their people when they get in.
The judiciary should represent sound judgement before they represent partisan politics.
For that matter I believe that they should be evenly male and female by law with the odd judge being the senior member of the court.
Our future depends on sound judgement. It is imperative that partisan politics evolve into a science of mutual responsibility for all citizens rather than the simple advancement of an agenda that half the people disagree with.
GoneOffShore
(17,340 posts)Said it before and I'll keep saying it.
lyingsackofmitt
(105 posts)Young, progressive women that will live a long, long time!
Mike Nelson
(9,958 posts)...as long as they're for equal rights!
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)IMO, it should be 5 women, 4 men, because we have more women than men in this country. We surely have plenty of women to choose from...
kentuck
(111,098 posts)with that sentiment.
CTyankee
(63,912 posts)hifiguy
(33,688 posts)on the SCOTUS.
Motown_Johnny
(22,308 posts)an African American woman would be the next nominee.
The court needs to reflect the makeup of the country and this would be a step in the right direction.
Smarmie Doofus
(14,498 posts)Scalia was barely 50.
Thomas was 40-something.
Republicans play this game for keeps.
Wiki on SCOTUS
>>>However, justices tend to be appointed after having made significant achievements in law or politics, which excludes many young potential candidates from consideration. At the same time, justices appointed at too advanced an age will likely have short tenures on the Court.>>>>
Tee-hee. Them was the daze.