Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
32 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
A thought on the so-called "secession movement." (Original Post) WilliamPitt Nov 2012 OP
We should call their bluff. JaneQPublic Nov 2012 #1
Is this your facebook page Will?n/t Horse with no Name Nov 2012 #2
No. WilliamPitt Nov 2012 #4
:) Horse with no Name Nov 2012 #9
I do have an FB page WilliamPitt Nov 2012 #10
I live in Arkansas. I just found out from a friend that some Arkansas residents Arkansas Granny Nov 2012 #3
I saw a couple of South Carolina petitions, too SouthernLiberal Nov 2012 #15
I haven't said anything about this movement because I think Cleita Nov 2012 #5
I see it as media crap. AlinPA Nov 2012 #6
Deport Everyone That Signed A Petition To Withdraw Their State From The United States Of America. robertpaulsen Nov 2012 #7
I respectfully disagree Polldancer2012 Nov 2012 #8
If millions of the low income people flee... CJCRANE Nov 2012 #14
Low income blue collar repubs, aka white trash lol nt Polldancer2012 Nov 2012 #17
Yeah... your understanding of true poverty seems to be rather limited. TalkingDog Nov 2012 #18
Wouldn't they have strict immigration? Duh Polldancer2012 Nov 2012 #20
Those things cost money. You aren't helping your case. Every thing you've suggested is TalkingDog Nov 2012 #23
I just see it differently Polldancer2012 Nov 2012 #26
The US will mercuryblues Nov 2012 #28
well... Polldancer2012 Nov 2012 #29
you have a lot of ifs in there mercuryblues Nov 2012 #32
They wouldn't be enough CJCRANE Nov 2012 #31
It would, but ... kurt_cagle Nov 2012 #27
not to be off topic CatWoman Nov 2012 #11
Yup WilliamPitt Nov 2012 #12
I say let them go for a provisional period, say four years - no voting, nothing. HopeHoops Nov 2012 #13
I say let them go. They are a net income loss. Let them fund their own military. LOL. nm rhett o rick Nov 2012 #16
Secede. Go Galt. Please. phantom power Nov 2012 #19
Be sure to go piss directly on one of those Veterans we honored a couple of days ago cherish44 Nov 2012 #21
? WilliamPitt Nov 2012 #22
I might be wrong, but I think they're talking to the SECDEErs TalkingDog Nov 2012 #24
Haven't any of these people ever heard of "self deportation?" thucythucy Nov 2012 #25
Three years is about right. JoeyT Nov 2012 #30

JaneQPublic

(7,113 posts)
1. We should call their bluff.
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:23 PM
Nov 2012

Tell them not to let the door hit them on the way out.

Smart money says they'll do like a young child who threatens to run away from home: If allowed to pack their bag and take three steps out the door, they'll burst into tears and come running home.

Horse with no Name

(33,956 posts)
9. :)
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:50 PM
Nov 2012

Thanks! Was going to add you,lol.

I don't do very much politics on my FB page but was going to make an exception.

Arkansas Granny

(31,528 posts)
3. I live in Arkansas. I just found out from a friend that some Arkansas residents
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:31 PM
Nov 2012

have petitioned to secede. It's embarassing.

SouthernLiberal

(407 posts)
15. I saw a couple of South Carolina petitions, too
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 04:37 PM
Nov 2012

That did not surprise me though, since we have already been the chosen target of the folks who want to take over SC and then secede to form an evangelical christian nation.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
5. I haven't said anything about this movement because I think
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:41 PM
Nov 2012

it's another issue to distract us from what is really going on. We have to really watch what is going on in Washington during the lame duck period until January when the power structure shifts.

robertpaulsen

(8,632 posts)
7. Deport Everyone That Signed A Petition To Withdraw Their State From The United States Of America.
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:44 PM
Nov 2012

I signed this petition laughingly, wondering how many people who actually signed a petition to withdraw their state from the USA ever said to someone else, "America! Love it or leave it!"

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/deport-everyone-signed-petition-withdraw-their-state-united-states-america/dmQl1bXL

 

Polldancer2012

(88 posts)
8. I respectfully disagree
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 03:46 PM
Nov 2012

Let me explain why I am right.

Lets pretend BOOM Texas is a nation. First thing that happens is an uber right wing constitution and the Dems flee the state. That includes millions of low income people from urban areas. Then businesses will move to Texas, wealthy people will move there for tax reasons.

At this point the US would have to cordon off the state and have no trade agreements because if Texas were allowed to trade with the US it would be a wealthy nation.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
14. If millions of the low income people flee...
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 04:21 PM
Nov 2012

then who will do all the low-paying but necessary jobs?

And why would businesses relocate there if there is no pool of available workers?

TalkingDog

(9,001 posts)
18. Yeah... your understanding of true poverty seems to be rather limited.
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 05:27 PM
Nov 2012

You sound like those people who berated the poor in New Orleans for not leaving before the storm came.

How the hell are all those urban poor supposed to get out? Walk? Cause a good number of them don't have cars or the money for gasoline. And then there is the: I'm not moving no matter what apolitical poor.

Given that more of the poor states are conservative, I'm pretty sure that the conservative poor who could afford to move to Texas would outnumber those that left. That means they would end up with more needy people than before they "secdeeded".

 

Polldancer2012

(88 posts)
20. Wouldn't they have strict immigration? Duh
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 05:38 PM
Nov 2012

And the US would surely run evacuation transports out of Texas.

TalkingDog

(9,001 posts)
23. Those things cost money. You aren't helping your case. Every thing you've suggested is
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 05:59 PM
Nov 2012

a drain on their now-limited economy.

 

Polldancer2012

(88 posts)
26. I just see it differently
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 06:16 PM
Nov 2012

Texas would be the new "Caymans"

IF the US allowed trade between nations...

I can't imagine how many businesses would move their business and cash there.

Why is there auto mfg in Tennessee? Same reason why there'd be mfg in Texas.

Come on, you can do better.

mercuryblues

(14,537 posts)
28. The US will
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 07:05 PM
Nov 2012

have no choice but to pull out the military bases.

Major Installations

Army
•Fort Bliss
•Red River Army Depot
•Fort Hood
•Sam Houston/Camp Bullis
•Ingleside Army Depot

Navy & Marine Corps
•Corpus Christi Naval Air Station/Naval Hospital/Naval Station
•Kingsville Naval Air Station

Air Force
•Randolph AFB
•Brooks City Base
•Lackland AFB
•Sheppard AFB
•Air Force Plant 4 (formerly Carswell AFB)
•Dyess AFB
•Goodfellow AFB
•Laughlin AFB

Coast Guard
•Corpus Christi
•Houston/Galveston
•VTS Houston/Galveston
•Air Station Corpus Christi
•Air Station Houston
•Search and Rescue Station Freeport
•Search and Rescue Station Port Aransas
•Marine Safety Unit Port Arthur
•VTS Port Arthur
•Marine Safety Unit Texas City


Now factor in the loss of spending. No FEMA is a biggie for Texas as they tend to get hurricanes, hope they allow people to keep their bootstraps. Football season would be pretty boring with only 2 teams.

Forget those student loans and pell grants for college students. I wonder how long it would take for the highway system to crumble without federal funds.

How will they protect themselves if Mexico decides to invade?

There isn't anything made in Texas that the US can't get elsewhere. So I suspect the US will ban trade with Texas and get a UN coalition of sanctions.

Now do you really think Texas would not only survive, but thrive.

 

Polldancer2012

(88 posts)
29. well...
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 12:56 AM
Nov 2012

I said several times in my post...

IF TRADE IS ALLOWED.

Obviously the US can bomb Texas duh.

But if Texas were allowed to survive LIKE MEXICO or LIKE CANADA... as a neighbor and trading ally... yes they'd thrive.

And if it was an amicable separation, they'd negotiate Texas keeping some of the military hardware and infrastructure. Mexico invading lol?? The 3rd Armored Cav by ITSELF could beat anything the nation of MEXICO has lol.

But this is all philosophic masturbation as it will never happen. It just annoys me when people say dumb things like "Texas couldn't survive without the US"

mercuryblues

(14,537 posts)
32. you have a lot of ifs in there
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 12:25 PM
Nov 2012

Do you really think the US government would let Texas secede amicably? That is pure fantasy. Allowing Texas keep billions of dollars of military equipment. Nope. That would never happen.

The 3rd armored Calvary would save Texas from a Mexican invasion. Do you mean the 3AC that is PART of the US Army? That one? Think again. Sure some military would try to defect and defend Texas. They would even probably get a lot of people to move there. Just as many people would be leaving.

Do you honestly think the US government would let a state secede? There would be war and bombs dropped. The last time states tried to really secede there was this thing called THE CIVIL WAR. How sure are you of the people in Texas taking up arms in a revolt? If they are that anxious to actually go to war there is one in Afghanistan they could volunteer for, but they aren't.

How will Texas survive as a country after the US declares war on it? Blocking the ports, getting the UN to authorize sanctions and trade barriers.

Texas could not survive without the US government. Even Rick Perry knows that. Texas gets back MORE in federal dollars than it pays in. They will lose the income they get from the military bases. They will lose the shipping industry, they will lose FEMA, they will lose highway spending, and lose infrastructure spending. Not to mention the revenue the sports teams generate. No funding for education. No more college loans and Pell grants = A loss in enrollment. No more Federal grants. UTEP just received a million dollar grant to innovate green technology. Those types of grants will be GONE. The higher ED system will not fare well.

There is nothing that Texas provides the US, that we couldn't get elsewhere. So I will say the Texas today would not survive without the US. Texas would survive in name only. It won't be the Texas you're picturing. It will look more like Afghanistan. It is dumb to think otherwise.

I think it would benefit secessionists to start thinking about America and Americans instead of themselves. It is time for them to stop listening to the hate speech and start supporting the US. It is time for the rmoney's and trumps of this country to give back willingly to the country that helped make them rich. It is time for the hate preach to stop and ministers to lift up their congregations instead of fleecing them. It is time for politicians to stop suppressing the people in favor of the few. It is time for the secession talk to stop. Even if it is not serious. It serves no useful purpose for the future of this country. It serves the purpose of the oligarchs; keeping the citizens divided.

It is just time.

CJCRANE

(18,184 posts)
31. They wouldn't be enough
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 08:09 AM
Nov 2012

to do all the menial jobs that the rich and corporations rely on.

But in any case, I doubt poor Democrats would leave because, as has been pointed out, by definition the poor can't afford to relocate.

There's more likely to be a brain drain of the educated and high income earners.

kurt_cagle

(534 posts)
27. It would, but ...
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 06:20 PM
Nov 2012

Texas is still oil rich, albeit not as much as in the past, and there would be significant questions concerning any oil wells more than 20 miles off the coast. It would also be a business magnet at first, assuming massive liberalization of govt regulations and taxes. However, over time they'd experience a brain drain of qualified labor, and the needs of setting up a new self-sustaining government would ultimately end up driving a move towards "nationalization" of resources for tax purposes. They'd also find themselves seriously struggling with pollution issues, and the first time a hurricane hits Galveston or Houston, the costs involved could be stratospheric.

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
13. I say let them go for a provisional period, say four years - no voting, nothing.
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 04:09 PM
Nov 2012

They'll come crawling back home within six months.

phantom power

(25,966 posts)
19. Secede. Go Galt. Please.
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 05:33 PM
Nov 2012

But that would give us some peace and quiet, and let us have nice things, and so Murphy's Law indicates it will never happen.

cherish44

(2,566 posts)
21. Be sure to go piss directly on one of those Veterans we honored a couple of days ago
Tue Nov 13, 2012, 05:45 PM
Nov 2012

you know for serving, sacrificing and dying for this country they hate so much.

JoeyT

(6,785 posts)
30. Three years is about right.
Wed Nov 14, 2012, 03:39 AM
Nov 2012

But in that three years they'd become a third world country and lynch anyone that was LGBT, non-religious (Or the wrong religion), a minority, or a liberal. In the end they'd run out of hated groups to kill and probably have the death penalty for being destitute. So it's probably not an experiment worth trying.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»A thought on the so-calle...