Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 09:43 PM Nov 2012

Does Obama HAVE to nominate Susan Rice, now that he's been told by Repubs he CAN'T?

If he doesn't nominate her, it will look like he averted a fight over her nomination, won't it? Does that mean that McCain and Graham have, in essence, forced him to nominate her?

Sticky situation, since he hasn't decided yet and may well have not nominated her.

22 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Does Obama HAVE to nominate Susan Rice, now that he's been told by Repubs he CAN'T? (Original Post) Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 OP
Yes, please! dem4ward Nov 2012 #1
It's not good if it looks like Repubs controlled who he nominated. That is, that Repubs Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #8
No, he can do whatever he wants. elleng Nov 2012 #2
Well, they stopped Obama from naming Elizabeth Warren for a consumer post rocktivity Nov 2012 #3
Schwing! Give rock a point! nt Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #9
Two, count 'em: 2 Repubs have said no and those two DonViejo Nov 2012 #4
No, there are others joining in. It was discussed by several at the Benghazi hrg today. nt Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #15
Those were members of the House, not the Senate Committee that DonViejo Nov 2012 #18
I said "Republicans." nt Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #19
And that's what I am talking about also. nt DonViejo Nov 2012 #21
No, he can nominate who he wants: he's the President; he's politically pretty smart, and struggle4progress Nov 2012 #5
He should nominate McCain, and then Graham. JoePhilly Nov 2012 #6
+ 1 n/t ejbr Nov 2012 #17
He'll do whatever's best for the office, not to react to the GOP. That's THEIR thing. -nt CakeGrrl Nov 2012 #7
Graham was supposed to be Secretary of State under McCain JI7 Nov 2012 #10
no. ignore them and make his choice. call out their pitiness in absurdity and tell them to GROW UP seabeyond Nov 2012 #11
He doesn't work that way BeyondGeography Nov 2012 #12
They are probably trying to get him to nominate Kerry gulliver Nov 2012 #13
To take Kerry's Senate seat? nt Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #14
Y, I wouldn't put it past them. nt gulliver Nov 2012 #20
He doesn't have to, but he should... Kalidurga Nov 2012 #16
What you do every single time is have a list of the very most liberal nominees TheKentuckian Nov 2012 #22

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
8. It's not good if it looks like Repubs controlled who he nominated. That is, that Repubs
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 09:49 PM
Nov 2012

in essence made him feel he had to, so he did. As opposed to an independent decision.

But maybe it doesn't matter, in the end.

rocktivity

(44,576 posts)
3. Well, they stopped Obama from naming Elizabeth Warren for a consumer post
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 09:47 PM
Nov 2012

wonder how that worked out...


rocktivity

DonViejo

(60,536 posts)
18. Those were members of the House, not the Senate Committee that
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 11:15 PM
Nov 2012

was holding the hearings. Senators approve candidates for SoS, not House members

struggle4progress

(118,285 posts)
5. No, he can nominate who he wants: he's the President; he's politically pretty smart, and
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 09:48 PM
Nov 2012

he has a good vetting operation, as well as a fine list of possible candidates

She might be the person he picks, or she might not be

I'm sure he has some clue what he's doin

JoePhilly

(27,787 posts)
6. He should nominate McCain, and then Graham.
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 09:48 PM
Nov 2012

Then let Dem Senators grill those two idiots on Iraq and WMDs.

And then when that's over, nominate the person he really wants.

JI7

(89,249 posts)
10. Graham was supposed to be Secretary of State under McCain
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 09:51 PM
Nov 2012

they can't seem to get over the fact that it will not happen.

Kalidurga

(14,177 posts)
16. He doesn't have to, but he should...
Thu Nov 15, 2012, 10:54 PM
Nov 2012

Then they have a choice. Go bat shit for no reason and damage their images ie McCain and Graham. Or they can back off and start to restore their reputations.

TheKentuckian

(25,026 posts)
22. What you do every single time is have a list of the very most liberal nominees
Fri Nov 16, 2012, 12:15 AM
Nov 2012

and gum up the obstruction.

How is it you think they get assured nutjobs and incompetents? They just keep shoving that shit through and send out firebomb and utterly unqualified types to defuse resistance for the true target after a big stand off.

ALWAYS be attacking against the Dark Agers and the beyond greedy.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Does Obama HAVE to nomina...