Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
Editorials & Other Articles
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsShaker Heights: One Suburb's Attempt to Build an Integrated Community

https://www.liberalpatriot.com/p/one-suburbs-attempt-to-build-an-integrated
If you care about social mobility and cohesion in America, you have to care about the enduring racial segregationand rising income segregationfound in American neighborhoods and public schools. Yet these problems are so pervasive that they have in some ways taken on the air of inevitability. So its intriguing to come across a community that has taken a more hopeful path. Thats the subject of Washington Post reporter Laura Mecklers fascinating new book, Dream Town: Shaker Heights and the Quest for Racial Equity. Why, she asks, has one upper-middle class Cleveland suburb tried, over several decades, to create something different: a racially integrated community and system of public schools? And how successful has it been?

Meckler, a Gen Xer who grew up and attended public schools in Shaker Heights, draws upon more than 250 interviews to tell the evolution of the town through a series of engaging vignettes about individuals from Shaker Heights black and white communities. She details what Shaker Heights got right, as well as where it fell short, or overreached. Throughout, she questions dominant narratives found on parts of the left that America is too racist to seek integration anywhere, and from parts of the right that school integration is a distraction from Americas real educational problems, teacher unions and single-parent families.
Located next to the City of Clevelands east side, Shaker Heights began in the early twentieth century as a classic exclusive American suburb that was socially engineered to include only people of the right sortthose who were white, Christian, and wealthy. Developers in the 1920s advertised that the town would offer contentment, forever assured by protective restrictions. Local developers and landowners used the tools then available: now-unconstitutional racially restrictive covenants and economic zoning rules that outlawed the construction of multifamily housing in most areas of town, zoning rules that remain pervasive today.
In Shaker Heights, the communitys builders noted, homes would be required to be two full stories in height, and residents would be safe from flats, terraces, and double houses. This policy kept working-class people of all races out, and when a few upper-middle class black families tried to buy in Shaker Heights in the 1920s, they faced intimidation and attempts to drive them out with stones and fire. By the mid-twentieth century Shaker Heights would grow to become one of the wealthiest communities in the country, one that remained overwhelmingly white.
Embracing Racial Integration........
snip
4 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Shaker Heights: One Suburb's Attempt to Build an Integrated Community (Original Post)
Celerity
Sep 2023
OP
PSPS
(14,525 posts)1. Shaker Heights is where fictional character Ward Cleaver grew up.
Celerity
(49,754 posts)2. When Ward Cleaver Caused Social Anxiety
In the early 1960s, an Illinois Children and Family Services worker tried to figure out how TV dads were impacting contemporary American fathers.
https://daily.jstor.org/when-ward-cleaver-caused-social-anxiety/

Before there was Homer Simpson or Ray Barone, there were sitcom dads like Ward Cleaver, Jim Anderson, and Danny Williams. These all-American dads made new television networks big bucksand in the early 1960s, an Illinois Children and Family Services worker named June E. Foster tried to figure out how theyd impacted contemporary American fathers. Now television, she wrote, is a powerful socializing force. She wondered if television fathers were contributing to what she saw as an epidemic of broken homes and confused gender roles. So she surveyed 28 real-life dads.
First, she had the fathers capture their concept of the ideal father in a document that contained thirteen different attributes. Participants could rate each attribute by its importance or unimportance on a sliding scale. They ranked attributes like sociability, morality, potency, and excitability. Then, two weeks later, they did the same for television fathers from Lassie, Dennis the Menace, Father of the Bride, and Danny Thomas. The ideal father identified by the men in the studies reads as a paragon of both manliness and parenting. Logical and calm, sociable and effective, this ideal father was wise, strong, and slightly dominating. This warm, secure person was reliable and competent.
So how did the TV dads score on this demanding scale? Not that well. The men rated TV dads as less effective, wise, and consistent than the ideal dad. These permissive fathers differed greatly from the imaginary father against which they were measured. The dad from Lassie won out as most ideal, but even he couldnt quite make the grade. For Foster, the study was a step toward understanding the frightening and potentially destabilizing force of television. The social anxiety caused by the unknown effect of television warranted further study, she concluded. She also pointed out that television could be used to spark conversations about parenting and child development, perhaps pointing to a positive use for the new medium.
Fosters recommendation that parents censor, if necessary, the images of family life and roles presented in televisions family series may seem curious in an age when hyperrealistic violence, vapid reality and brutal political discourse dominates the airwaves. But it reflects its eras preoccupation with proper roles for parents and childrena preoccupation that was about to be exploded by the Kennedy Assassination, the Vietnam War, Richard Nixon, and a cultural shift that put teenaged rebellion and a rejection of all things square at the forefront of American culture. Foster thought her study would set the stage for a better understanding of the effects of television, but in 2017 it reads as a document of an institution teetering on the edge of revolution.
snip
https://daily.jstor.org/when-ward-cleaver-caused-social-anxiety/

Before there was Homer Simpson or Ray Barone, there were sitcom dads like Ward Cleaver, Jim Anderson, and Danny Williams. These all-American dads made new television networks big bucksand in the early 1960s, an Illinois Children and Family Services worker named June E. Foster tried to figure out how theyd impacted contemporary American fathers. Now television, she wrote, is a powerful socializing force. She wondered if television fathers were contributing to what she saw as an epidemic of broken homes and confused gender roles. So she surveyed 28 real-life dads.
First, she had the fathers capture their concept of the ideal father in a document that contained thirteen different attributes. Participants could rate each attribute by its importance or unimportance on a sliding scale. They ranked attributes like sociability, morality, potency, and excitability. Then, two weeks later, they did the same for television fathers from Lassie, Dennis the Menace, Father of the Bride, and Danny Thomas. The ideal father identified by the men in the studies reads as a paragon of both manliness and parenting. Logical and calm, sociable and effective, this ideal father was wise, strong, and slightly dominating. This warm, secure person was reliable and competent.
So how did the TV dads score on this demanding scale? Not that well. The men rated TV dads as less effective, wise, and consistent than the ideal dad. These permissive fathers differed greatly from the imaginary father against which they were measured. The dad from Lassie won out as most ideal, but even he couldnt quite make the grade. For Foster, the study was a step toward understanding the frightening and potentially destabilizing force of television. The social anxiety caused by the unknown effect of television warranted further study, she concluded. She also pointed out that television could be used to spark conversations about parenting and child development, perhaps pointing to a positive use for the new medium.
Fosters recommendation that parents censor, if necessary, the images of family life and roles presented in televisions family series may seem curious in an age when hyperrealistic violence, vapid reality and brutal political discourse dominates the airwaves. But it reflects its eras preoccupation with proper roles for parents and childrena preoccupation that was about to be exploded by the Kennedy Assassination, the Vietnam War, Richard Nixon, and a cultural shift that put teenaged rebellion and a rejection of all things square at the forefront of American culture. Foster thought her study would set the stage for a better understanding of the effects of television, but in 2017 it reads as a document of an institution teetering on the edge of revolution.
snip
PSPS
(14,525 posts)4. LOL. "social anxiety?" LOL. Only when Eddie Haskell came over!
BeerBarrelPolka
(1,588 posts)3. Shaker Heights
Paul Newman was born and raised in Shaker Heights. It was heavily Jewish at one point.