Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

Gman

(24,780 posts)
1. The left sat on their hands 2 years ago
Fri Nov 16, 2012, 09:16 AM
Nov 2012

Bitching about Obama while the right worked their asses off. Now it's what we've got.

The left in general had such a profound ignorance of what the 08 election was about. Many thought they would punish Obama and the Democrats. What fools.

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
3. Scapegoating is what the other side does.
Fri Nov 16, 2012, 09:29 AM
Nov 2012

The (semi-)Left shouldn't engage in it. Besides, you have nothing to back up your claim.

myrna minx

(22,772 posts)
5. How do you know it was "the left" and not the moderates?
Fri Nov 16, 2012, 09:38 AM
Nov 2012

Do you have anything to back up that assertion? I'm considered "left" and everyone I know voted for the Dems in '10.

Gman

(24,780 posts)
7. Oh yeah, like the left was so happy with Obama
Fri Nov 16, 2012, 08:46 PM
Nov 2012

And just worked so hard to win back the state houses. Just like in 08, huh?

myrna minx

(22,772 posts)
8. As I said, I'm a lefty as are my friends and while I was disappointed with the healthcare battle,
Fri Nov 16, 2012, 09:00 PM
Nov 2012

and had many criticisms about this administration early on, I voted as did all of my "lefty" friends, and we all voted for Dems in '10.

I've voted in every election since 1990, even if it's a primary for school board.

So, you have nothing to back up your assertion other than your feelings? Where were the moderates? Did they come out to vote in droves or is your assertion based upon your own perception? Do you have exit poll evidence? Polls? Or just your "gut"?

tkmorris

(11,138 posts)
9. So, in other words, you have no evidence for your assertion
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 12:22 AM
Nov 2012

If you are going to place the blame for 2010 squarely at one groups feet you REALLY need to back up such a claim. Otherwise you just sound angry and a touch close-minded.

neverforget

(9,436 posts)
11. Take a look at the exit polls for 2010
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 12:37 AM
Nov 2012
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/2010-midterms-political-price-economic-pain/story?id=12041739#.UKcS64aPzbg

Swing-voting independents who, as usual, made the difference, favored Republicans for House by a thumping 16 points, 55-39 percent. Compare that to Obama's 8-point win among independents in 2008. It was the Republicans' biggest win among independents in exit polls dating to 1982 (by two points. The GOP won independents by 14 points in 1994, the last time they took control of the House.)

Sixty percent of whites backed Republican House candidates, the most in exit polls dating back to 1982. (In presidential rather than House vote Ronald Reagan won more whites in 1984).

Conservatives accounted for 41 percent of voters -- a high in recent exit polls exceeded, in available data, only by 43 percent in that Reagan re-election of 1984.

liberal_at_heart

(12,081 posts)
13. As far as I can tell no one on here claims to be an independent
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 01:24 AM
Nov 2012

In fact those of us who are on the left still consider ourselves democrat and vote democrat. Lord knows why. We get plenty of abuse and disrespect simply for daring to criticize anything Obama does. I'm done defending myself to people who are not worth wasting my time on. I am a liberal. I am on the left. I do like some of the policies that the Green Party believes in and I am not ashamed of it.

myrna minx

(22,772 posts)
14. Just as a side bar, what was your 2010 GOTV participation?
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 01:49 AM
Nov 2012
Did you knock on doors etc, or did you expect "the left" to do so?

Le Taz Hot

(22,271 posts)
2. They won't "un-Gerrymander," they'll
Fri Nov 16, 2012, 09:27 AM
Nov 2012

RE-Gerrymander it which is just the other side of an otherwise evil coin. By initiative, CA bypassed all of that and the districts are now drawn via a bi-partisan commission. The result? We have a Super Majority in both houses of the CA legislature. Here's a FAQ sheet on what California does:

http://wedrawthelines.ca.gov/faq.html

 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
12. We have to win PA back. And we have to win the 2020 cycle, because that is when the lines will be...
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 01:17 AM
Nov 2012

... drawn again.

dsc

(52,162 posts)
15. well the places we have a shot would be
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 02:17 AM
Nov 2012

WI we would need lege and gov. MI we would need the same. OH we would have to win 2 out of 3 of Gov, Aud, Sec of State. PA Gov and lege. NC lege only. NJ gov only. Those were the worst screw jobs. Realistically our best shots are NJ, OH (where we don't have to overcome a gerrymander) and PA (state leg drawn by commission). In the rest we would have to overcome partisan maps to be able to redraw the maps. NC is just not possible. We might be able to redistrict NY depending on how the state senate turns out but we already have a 21 to 6 majority. I think the best we ever did was hold the GOP to 4 seats so we are close to the limit there. NJ also can realistically only get us a couple seats (we have a 5/5 split now and maybe could get a 7/3 split with a better draw). If we got all three of the 'easy' states and redrew NY maybe we could get 2 in NY, 3 in NJ, 4 in PA (that would be a fair map given our percent of vote), and 5 in Ohio (4 to get us to fair plus one). That is a real stretch and is only 15 seats.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Democrats need to win sta...