Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
84 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
REID TO MCCAIN: "I refuse to allow the Senate to be used as a venue for baseless partisan attacks." (Original Post) kpete Nov 2012 OP
Smackdown! BumRushDaShow Nov 2012 #1
Let's celebrate . It appears Obama and Reid at getting better cyclezealot Nov 2012 #51
ouch! Kali Nov 2012 #2
+ struggle4progress Nov 2012 #57
Operative Word being.. Cha Nov 2012 #3
Expect to see the bitter old man on the Sunday shows Angry Dragon Nov 2012 #4
that was cool Douglas Carpenter Nov 2012 #5
*holds up hand in class* Question on procedure... Will McInsane be a ranking member in 2013? freshwest Nov 2012 #6
No: he's not in the majority party frazzled Nov 2012 #17
I know he's not in the majority, but the seats on the committees must be assigned bipartisanly. freshwest Nov 2012 #37
Each party makes its own committee assignments frazzled Nov 2012 #38
And the GOP wants someone to jump up and play the fool. I don't for one minute believe John or Dana freshwest Nov 2012 #41
McCain is going to lose his committee seat in January... Spazito Nov 2012 #58
Wow, that's extra disgusting. And I haven't read anything good from the tribes in AZ about McCain. freshwest Nov 2012 #60
I suspect that whenever he does leave the Senate, either voluntarily or by electoral defeat... Spazito Nov 2012 #62
Or....Have you noticed some of these signs in his behavior! sheshe2 Nov 2012 #71
He has been known for his outbursts of anger for a long time... Spazito Nov 2012 #72
I know...That's one of the reasons he scares the heck out of me. sheshe2 Nov 2012 #74
Losing the top ranking seat is why Mcrazy is throwing the tantrum sarcasmo Nov 2012 #69
Well crafted letter.. Thanks for posting... nt ProudProgressiveNow Nov 2012 #7
Good for Harry! hrmjustin Nov 2012 #8
This is yet another in a long line of "sternly worded letters". Hugin Nov 2012 #9
what do you suggest? This dog shit about "sternly worded letters" cali Nov 2012 #21
Just like I was ignorant of the "close enough to steal" Republican election strategy? Hugin Nov 2012 #54
When I read the letter, I thought about what it meant for historical purposes. Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #45
You and I are among the very few who have read this letter. Hugin Nov 2012 #53
I'm not talking about NOW, or about the masses. Honeycombe8 Nov 2012 #64
McCain for sec of state julian09 Nov 2012 #10
Kick pinto Nov 2012 #11
Senator Harry Reid is absolutely rocking. He stood up for social security last week, now this! robinlynne Nov 2012 #12
Oh Mr. Reid sheshe2 Nov 2012 #13
Awesome. AzDar Nov 2012 #14
Mmm. To have been the page that delivered this. Barack_America Nov 2012 #15
I'll bet everyone in DC could hear McPain screaming obscenities - little man, big talk. UtahLib Nov 2012 #16
I have one problem with the way this was written, ashling Nov 2012 #18
this FirstLight Nov 2012 #24
No, on the floor they speak of other sen. in the third person ashling Nov 2012 #39
In your first three examples of first person Reid is addressing McCain personally. xtraxritical Nov 2012 #75
I respectfully disagree ashling Nov 2012 #82
Oh please, McCain lost his shit when that CNN reporter simply asked him why he skipped the briefing. DRoseDARs Nov 2012 #32
"The man done sprung a leak in his dingy..." ashling Nov 2012 #40
Yeah, that irked me, too. silverweb Nov 2012 #47
I figured I would be the only person ashling Nov 2012 #52
Nope. silverweb Nov 2012 #65
Rational. Taking the high road. But most importantly, STRONG! nt patrice Nov 2012 #19
Awesome smackdown, Senator Reid. Thank you! catbyte Nov 2012 #20
Will this be published or has it already? FirstLight Nov 2012 #22
What do you mean by published? Tx4obama Nov 2012 #35
Bravo !!! n/t Tx4obama Nov 2012 #23
It would be so nice to have the GOP's sense of entitlement come to an end! young_at_heart Nov 2012 #25
Slammed the door on that fossilized asshole. nt bluestate10 Nov 2012 #26
Post removed Post removed Nov 2012 #27
Go back to Fweeperville. You look like an idiot. Lex Nov 2012 #29
Please don't drag crap from the Washington Times to this board..... OldDem2012 Nov 2012 #30
Goodbye. progressoid Nov 2012 #31
LOL theKed Nov 2012 #34
Give 'em hell, Harry! I think I'm in love Hekate Nov 2012 #28
Great. That is part of history now. How do you like your role so far John? Coyotl Nov 2012 #33
Wow, & 2 directly call out the wtchhnt 4 exposing clssfied nfo & call out McCain 4 skipping briefing DRoseDARs Nov 2012 #36
This should cause The Wizard Nov 2012 #42
Damn, Little Johnny was taken behind the woodshed. HooptieWagon Nov 2012 #43
Woah! glinda Nov 2012 #44
HERE HERE!!!!!!!!! eqfan592 Nov 2012 #46
He continues to make an ass of himself, reminiscent of 2008 Sugarcoated Nov 2012 #48
Democrats with guts! silverweb Nov 2012 #49
Democrats Growing a back bonen/t outsideworld Nov 2012 #50
Fantastic letter. I wonder how far through the letter a staffer read aloud to McCain before myrna minx Nov 2012 #55
Harry knocked him out! nt RomneyLies Nov 2012 #56
Awesome letter and I love the ccs as well... Spazito Nov 2012 #59
My favorite: The reference to Ms. Condoleeza Rice and quoting her.... Pachamama Nov 2012 #80
Yep, it was a two-fer... Spazito Nov 2012 #81
Translation: AlbertCat Nov 2012 #61
Boom goes the dynamite Botany Nov 2012 #63
Yes, nothing say bitter old man and bitter old lady than McCain/Palin. Since the southernyankeebelle Nov 2012 #66
Give 'em Hell Harry! n/t Dalai_1 Nov 2012 #67
McCain's still pissed off he and Bimbo lost in 2008. He was sure they bought this one. His father is judesedit Nov 2012 #68
Fuckin' A. Harry Reid is capable of just about anything when he's pissed. wtmusic Nov 2012 #70
Harry..... DeSwiss Nov 2012 #73
That was one of the most temperate, florid and precise ways of saying MADem Nov 2012 #76
SNAP!!!!!! Shuhered Nov 2012 #77
Holy shit! longship Nov 2012 #78
OH SNAP! Up2Late Nov 2012 #79
Go Harry! Go harry! Shilo Nov 2012 #83
that's an awesome letter bigtree Nov 2012 #84

cyclezealot

(4,802 posts)
51. Let's celebrate . It appears Obama and Reid at getting better
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 04:44 AM
Nov 2012

at GOP smack downs.. They have pandered to them too long. Dem's need grow a pair and fight back. This is a good start..
High priority in the Senate should be Reid's plans to make a filibuster be a real filibuster.
If those proposing a filibuster are not ready to filibuster with live talk, then there will be no filibuster.. More than fair minded, while preserving the concept of the filibuster.
It will allow filibusters , while disallowing 'filiblusters. '

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
6. *holds up hand in class* Question on procedure... Will McInsane be a ranking member in 2013?
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 12:07 AM
Nov 2012
How do you get these AWs off the important committees?

Are they purely on the basis of seniority?

Someone knows, bur not me.


BTW, good job, Harry!


frazzled

(18,402 posts)
17. No: he's not in the majority party
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 12:43 AM
Nov 2012

A ranking member is the second most senior member (after the chair) of the majority party in a committee.

* Sometimes the media uses the term also to refer to the most senior member of the minority party (who would become chair if that party takes control again).

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
37. I know he's not in the majority, but the seats on the committees must be assigned bipartisanly.
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 01:39 AM
Nov 2012

I think he's getting out of line and getting too much media attention. He's a ranking member as you say, not the committee chair. It seems like they'd be able to rein him in on these outrageous things. Appears this is more media driven than just procedure. I see where big mouth Rohrbacher got smacked down, but that was in media. He never should have gotten up and run his mouth. Not very statesman-like, but then there have been few of those kind of minds for a long time. Thanks for the reply.

frazzled

(18,402 posts)
38. Each party makes its own committee assignments
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 01:42 AM
Nov 2012

The majority party (now the Democrats) gets the chairmanship and more seats. We have no control over what the other party does with its assignments.

And seniority doesn't always play a role. But it is the usual method a party uses for assignments, unless they're punishing someone.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
41. And the GOP wants someone to jump up and play the fool. I don't for one minute believe John or Dana
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 02:13 AM
Nov 2012
care about this issue in terms of national security, justice or any of that.

Just getting media attention amd energy diverted away from the things Obama and the Democrats must get done.

Spazito

(50,495 posts)
58. McCain is going to lose his committee seat in January...
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 11:19 AM
Nov 2012

"But in January, the Arizona senator will lose his top-ranking committee seat due to term limits. The only ranking Republican spot available to him next session will be on the Indian Affairs Committee.

Unless, that is, the Senate creates a brand-new select committee. On Wednesday, McCain, flanked by Sens. Lindsey Graham (R-S.C.) and Kelly Ayotte (R-N.H.), proposed just that: a select committee with extensive authority to investigate the Benghazi, Libya, attack and the U.S. government's response."

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/11/16/john-mccain-benghazi-committee_n_2145457.html

It doesn't surprise me, sadly, that McCain would cravenly smear Ambassador Rice in order to try and retain his relevancy. It disgusts me but doesn't surprise me.

freshwest

(53,661 posts)
60. Wow, that's extra disgusting. And I haven't read anything good from the tribes in AZ about McCain.
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 01:56 PM
Nov 2012

Thanks for that additional information. How very transparent that he wants to set up a new committee like Ken Starr to waste taxpayer money and undermine those are who working to change things for the better.

He just officially joined the scumbag brigade, IMO. Not that they care what anyone thinks. Most likely he'll do as his kindred do, grease his way into some private firm when he leaves the Senate to live high the rest of his miserable life. What a disgrace.

Spazito

(50,495 posts)
62. I suspect that whenever he does leave the Senate, either voluntarily or by electoral defeat...
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 02:06 PM
Nov 2012

he will have a cushy place set up for him by one of the defence contracting corporations where he will continue to bloviate ad nauseum.

His behavior has been truly disgusting.

sheshe2

(83,940 posts)
71. Or....Have you noticed some of these signs in his behavior!
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 08:44 PM
Nov 2012

Bipolar disorder is a complex genetic disorder. The mood swings associated with it alternate from major, or clinical, depression to mania or extreme elation. The mood swings can range from very mild to extreme, and they can happen gradually or suddenly within a time frame of minutes to hours. When mood swings happen frequently, the process is called rapid cycling.

Along with the dramatic mood swings, patients with bipolar disorder may have disturbances in thinking. They may also have distortions of perception and impairment in social functioning.

I think McCain lost it during and after the 2008 elections! I firmly believe he is not a Well man.

Spazito

(50,495 posts)
72. He has been known for his outbursts of anger for a long time...
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 09:10 PM
Nov 2012

his behavior is not new at all. Here is an eye-opening look at the history of his temper tantrums, the videos are from 2007 forward:

John McCain's temper tantrums: A video history

http://theweek.com/article/index/236549/john-mccains-temper-tantrums-a-video-history

sheshe2

(83,940 posts)
74. I know...That's one of the reasons he scares the heck out of me.
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 10:13 PM
Nov 2012

In 2007 He was 71years old....now 76. I am aware of all his outbursts . Including telling a member of congress to go F*** themselves. What 76 year old man,Senator, and ex Presidential candidate would act like this in front of reporters and audience!

This clearly shows an impairment in social functioning!

4. McCain vs. hecklers (2012): While stumping for Republican Senate candidate Jeff Flake in Arizona, McCain took on a group of hecklers in the crowd, calling them jerks and telling them to shut up. He also stuck his tongue out at them. "I'm getting too old to put up with jerks like you," he said.

Bipolar Disorder:
Snip>
Along with the dramatic mood swings, patients with bipolar disorder may have disturbances in thinking. They may also have distortions of perception and impairment in social functioning

&feature=player_embedded

The man is losing it! Or maybe already had lost it!

Hugin

(33,222 posts)
9. This is yet another in a long line of "sternly worded letters".
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 12:15 AM
Nov 2012

Each of which was totally ignored.

This tactic does not work.

 

cali

(114,904 posts)
21. what do you suggest? This dog shit about "sternly worded letters"
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 01:05 AM
Nov 2012

is unbelievably ignorant of how the Senate works.

Hugin

(33,222 posts)
54. Just like I was ignorant of the "close enough to steal" Republican election strategy?
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 09:59 AM
Nov 2012

Okay. I get the message. I voted so now my opinion no longer matters.

Time for me to fade away back under the bus to allow the Democratic bubble (yes, there is one here as well) of denial to re-form. Instead of advocating being Proactive in a changing world of public perception.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
45. When I read the letter, I thought about what it meant for historical purposes.
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 02:46 AM
Nov 2012

It presents the majority leader's version of events now unfolding, in official form, for history. Which is important.

It's also good for morale of the party, to take a firm stand and put it in writing, rather than a 30 second soundbite on tv.

I also remembered, when reading the letter, that Clinton had said okay when asked if he would agree to a "special investigator" into the Lewinsky matter. The Democrats should never have agreed to that.

Hugin

(33,222 posts)
53. You and I are among the very few who have read this letter.
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 09:47 AM
Nov 2012

Last edited Sat Nov 17, 2012, 03:48 PM - Edit history (2)

There are a few more who will have heard of the letter, but, it's impact will be quite limited in the public sphere.

Which is where the republicans intend to take the Benghazi matter. They are trying to sway public opinion in their usual manner. What they say is rarely true. However, they feel (with some justification in practice) that if they say it loud enough and long enough it will "become true" to a large segment of the population. Large enough to damage the cause of the Democrats? Maybe.

The President himself said his greatest problem during his first administration was getting his message and initiatives out through the extensive obstructions posed by the largely right-wing owned and hostile media.

This letter from Senator Reid is more of what has already been shown to be ineffectual. What would I do? I'm not sure, but, I'm also not in Congress or in DC for that matter.

Honeycombe8

(37,648 posts)
64. I'm not talking about NOW, or about the masses.
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 05:21 PM
Nov 2012

I'm talking about history. Those people who research for years and write historical books, such as the books on Lincoln, the Civil War, The War of 1812, etc. That's when letters by other politicians during an era are read, and they are read by academics and historians and authors.

That's what I meant. Reid has, for what it's worth, put in official writing his thoughts and position on these supposed investigations. A 30 second soundbite would likely never be viewed by historians, or used in any history or account of the Benghazi investigations. An official letter is one thing that would be gathered and read and used, if the author chose to.

 

julian09

(1,435 posts)
10. McCain for sec of state
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 12:19 AM
Nov 2012

Senile old fool would filibuster his own nomination along with his sweetheart sen Graham.

ashling

(25,771 posts)
18. I have one problem with the way this was written,
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 12:49 AM
Nov 2012

The letter was addressed to McCain, and should, therefore have only referred to him in the second person or by referencing news reports, etc. He refers to McCain's shenanigans by referring to him in the third person as if this was written primarily for other readers ... like the press. I know that it ccs other senators, but I am just concerned that the McCain will get his back up and rage at Reif=d for writing this for the press.

my $.02

ashling

(25,771 posts)
39. No, on the floor they speak of other sen. in the third person
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 01:43 AM
Nov 2012

because they are technically addressing the president of the senate. This was a personal letter to addressed to McCain. The first three paragraphs appropriately speak to the addressee " in response to your suggestion (para. 1)", "As you know, (para. 2)" , and "as you know (para 3)"

The switch, though not uniform throughout, comes in the next paragraph. That paragraph starts out "You already have the opportunity..." The second sentence , however, seems to be as an aside in Shakespeare: " For instance, on Wednesday, Senator McCain failed to..." . . .

that's it! He is being Shakespearian! that's the ticket!

I appeal to Brother Aristus: give us a line: a fare thee well for the groundlings.





 

xtraxritical

(3,576 posts)
75. In your first three examples of first person Reid is addressing McCain personally.
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 12:19 AM
Nov 2012

In the later paragraphs he is addressing McCain in McCain's capacity as a US senator and his duties thereof, therefore the formal language. In my opinion McCain is the ultimate surrogate of the Republican party. Next to last in his class, not too bright, and rich spoiled and obnoxious.

ashling

(25,771 posts)
82. I respectfully disagree
Mon Nov 19, 2012, 12:22 AM
Nov 2012

or in the alternative that it is still incorrect. The letter was addressed to McCain. It was not given as a speech on the floor where it would have been delivered as if to the presiding officer. Even if it had been, it would have been proper to speak of the Senator from Arizona or such.

The fact that McCain is a stupid obnoxious twit does not make it ok

 

DRoseDARs

(6,810 posts)
32. Oh please, McCain lost his shit when that CNN reporter simply asked him why he skipped the briefing.
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 01:27 AM
Nov 2012

Doesn't matter HOW Sen. Reid wrote or worded this letter, Sen. Crashy "Sarah Palin: That Happened" McGrumpy is gonna have a rage-stroke regardless. The man done sprung a leak in his dingy...

silverweb

(16,402 posts)
47. Yeah, that irked me, too.
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 02:55 AM
Nov 2012

[font color="navy" face="Verdana"]It started out addressing McCain in the 2nd person, then switched to the 3rd person, presumably to include the others named as receiving copies. Should be either/or, not both in the same letter.

It's probably just me getting old, but those kinds of inconsistencies irritate the hell out of me.

FirstLight

(13,366 posts)
22. Will this be published or has it already?
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 01:07 AM
Nov 2012

I want this letter to go viral.

the rebuke about the committees letting classified info slip in order to try to get shit to stick to Obama is PRICELESS!!!~!

young_at_heart

(3,772 posts)
25. It would be so nice to have the GOP's sense of entitlement come to an end!
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 01:09 AM
Nov 2012

He said what needed to be said----we all applaud you Sen. Reid!!

Response to kpete (Original post)

OldDem2012

(3,526 posts)
30. Please don't drag crap from the Washington Times to this board.....
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 01:23 AM
Nov 2012

....Free Republic or Red State will love it, and I suspect you know that, but it doesn't fly here.

 

Coyotl

(15,262 posts)
33. Great. That is part of history now. How do you like your role so far John?
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 01:29 AM
Nov 2012

feeling like you missed your retirement party a few years back ??

 

DRoseDARs

(6,810 posts)
36. Wow, & 2 directly call out the wtchhnt 4 exposing clssfied nfo & call out McCain 4 skipping briefing
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 01:35 AM
Nov 2012

eom

 

HooptieWagon

(17,064 posts)
43. Damn, Little Johnny was taken behind the woodshed.
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 02:35 AM
Nov 2012

I'll bet he was neck-vein popping apoplectic when he read that.

Sugarcoated

(7,733 posts)
48. He continues to make an ass of himself, reminiscent of 2008
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 03:00 AM
Nov 2012

It's so easy to push his buttons . . . I think he's toying with McRage in that letter

myrna minx

(22,772 posts)
55. Fantastic letter. I wonder how far through the letter a staffer read aloud to McCain before
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 10:05 AM
Nov 2012

he smashed something.

Spazito

(50,495 posts)
59. Awesome letter and I love the ccs as well...
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 11:31 AM
Nov 2012

CC:

Senator Mitch McConnell, Senate Minority Leader
Senator Lindsey Graham, Senate Armed Services Committee
Senator Kelly Ayotte, Senate Armed Services Committee

There would be more than just McCain exploding over this letter, the other craven creeps involved in this know this letter is directed to them as much as it is McCain.

Spazito

(50,495 posts)
81. Yep, it was a two-fer...
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 02:07 PM
Nov 2012

Pointing out that one of their own has completely disagreed with them while subtly reminding them of their hypocrisy because they did NOT have a problem when Condy actually lied, and lied multiple times, on the various shows, her lies as well as those of others causing the death of millions of Iraqis and thousands of American troops.

Botany

(70,594 posts)
63. Boom goes the dynamite
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 02:31 PM
Nov 2012

"Senator McCain failed to attend a classified briefing held by the Senate Homeland Security
Committee on this very issue."



"Bob Rumson your 15 minutes are over and I am Harry fucking Reid and i own your punk ass"*


* Credit to R. Reiner for the American President from which I sampled.

 

southernyankeebelle

(11,304 posts)
66. Yes, nothing say bitter old man and bitter old lady than McCain/Palin. Since the
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 06:47 PM
Nov 2012

president won back to back elections I have never seen such sour grapes. Now add Romney/Ryan to the list for the next 4 yrs. Crybabies unite.

judesedit

(4,443 posts)
68. McCain's still pissed off he and Bimbo lost in 2008. He was sure they bought this one. His father is
Sat Nov 17, 2012, 08:14 PM
Nov 2012

probably rolling in his grave over his son's multiple fuck-up's. He thought he gave him everything. Yeah. Everything but integrity.

MADem

(135,425 posts)
76. That was one of the most temperate, florid and precise ways of saying
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 12:33 AM
Nov 2012
Fuck you, Johnny, and that horse you rode in on! that I've seen in awhile!

longship

(40,416 posts)
78. Holy shit!
Sun Nov 18, 2012, 12:57 AM
Nov 2012

Harry has this thing. I am increasingly seeing the reason why Harry is the Senate majority leader. He is the real deal.

Damn! Democrats have things in order.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»REID TO MCCAIN: "I r...