General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region ForumsVery Interesting -- Obama Still Did Not Win The Senior Vote From What I Hear.
Does that mean that seniors supported privatization and cuts to their own care? They hated Obama that much?
coalition_unwilling
(14,180 posts)was a case of "Fuck them, I've got mine" mixed with "He's a n****r."
EC
(12,287 posts)the fund for the existing medicare people would have run dry because the young wouldn't be paying into it anymore.
doc03
(35,394 posts)Fridays Child
(23,998 posts)Any links?
bluestate10
(10,942 posts)BainsBane
(53,093 posts)Like NYT or Huffington Post, CNN, etc. . .
elleng
(131,227 posts)This one didn't.
meow2u3
(24,774 posts)and are more susceptible to propaganda and/or con jobs. They often become more trusting of untrustworthy persons the older they get.
Look at all the scams designed to separate seniors from their money. It sometimes takes a younger person to protect their elders from swindlers. Think about it.
Which means this: we have to reach seniors with a kind of campaign designed to reeducate them on how to resist a hustle from right-wing con artists.
Change has come
(2,372 posts)truedelphi
(32,324 posts)And due to how much it will cost the employer to put them on the company payroll, what with the insurance premiums being sky high, so they can't get re-employed, anywhere, well, of course they' re mad.
At least twelve million people who voted in 2008 didn't bother to vote this time around.
Hestia
(3,818 posts)still_one
(92,470 posts)bkkyosemite
(5,792 posts)luv_mykatz
(441 posts)and I am 58. No swallower of corporate owned media swill here. I know they are liars. I figured that out when Ronnie Raygun was elected as President in 1980. I have never, EVER voted for a repuke, not in all the 40 years that I have been eligible to vote. The repukes and everything they stand for a totally repugnant to me.
LeFleur1
(1,197 posts)....and that was for Eisenhower. Two seniors here voted for Obama and encouraged others to do so, too.
Republicans of today are intolerable in government...or anywhere else for that matter.
PennsylvaniaMatt
(966 posts)I once listened to an old family friend, a BIG right-winger, talk about people who get assistance from the government and how bad "socialized medicine" is. Minutes later, he was talking about how he didn't have to worry because his medical treatment was taken care of and covered by the VA...
There is a BIG double standard between many older folks who vote Republican.
BainsBane
(53,093 posts)Most of those complaining about entitlements are on Social Security. I don't understand that sort of cognitive dissonance.
nruthie
(466 posts)I'm a 70-year old woman and a long-time Obama supporter. Many of my senior friends are also supporters. Please don't automatically assume that all of us old white people are rabid Republicans! We're not all angry old malcontents; it just sometimes seems that way.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)nruthie
(466 posts)I'm sure I'll be spouting off on a regular basis from now on. This is where I get all the news that's fit to read.
sarge43
(28,946 posts)Same here. I don't understand those seniors. We would be among the first thrown off the boat. Further, most of them have children and grandchildren; don't they want a decent, secure future for their descendants?
Jennicut
(25,415 posts)He did the worst among seniors and the best among the youngest voters.
Generational differences I suppose. But not terrible among 45 to 64 and 65 and older.
progree
(10,926 posts)Hispanics)
http://edition.cnn.com/election/2012/results/race/president#exit-polls
In vote by age, there are shown 6 brackets and consistently the Obama % goes down as age goes up.
HOWEVER, when one looks at race-age combinations:
there's virtually no decline in Obama support among whites as age goes up,
ditto for blacks,
and only about a 9 percentage decline in support for Obama amongst Latinos from youngest to oldest.
In short, looking at the U.S. electorate overall, support for Obama goes down as age goes up because the proportion of whites goes up with age.
doc03
(35,394 posts)for people under 55 as long as they get theirs. I actually heard many of them say that. The lie about Obama cutting Medicare by $716 billon also carried a lot of weight.
scarletlib
(3,418 posts)Both my husband and I are seniors. We are 100% democratic and we along with our entire family voted for Obama both times.
I have real concerns for both my children and grandchildren's future. I don't want to see their benefits cut. I want them to have everything that I am entitled to as citizen and more if possible. It is a good thing if I as a senior can be less of financial burden to my children as I age because of programs like Social Security and Medicare. This holds true for the following generations as well.
I do care deeply about the upcoming generations and I believe many of us do so as well.
doc03
(35,394 posts)Medicare next April. But I have heard some seniors actually say it's only for the people under 55. A good many seniors also bought into the line that Obama raided $716 billion from medicare to fund Obamacare. They hammered on that lie since 2010, that's why you see most of the teabaggers are seniors I think.
yashoo
(55 posts)...until these last two elections. Because they won't vote for a black guy. They'll be back in the fold in 2016. Sad but true and I know they aren't alone.
They hate all of Romney's policies, re: Medicare, Social Security, etc. And it didn't matter.
shanti
(21,675 posts)she lives in arizona and is surrounded by wingers, but doesn't care what anyone thinks. she's never voted repub in her life.
cali
(114,904 posts)she lives in New Canaan, CT which went 3-1 for Romney. 3 time delegate to the DNC. LIfe long dem. And yes, the battle axe has all her marbles.
msanthrope
(37,549 posts)Lugnut
(9,791 posts)I'm 67 and my husband is 69 and we voted for the Prez. Our neighbors who are in their 70s did too.
hrmjustin
(71,265 posts)sabrina 1
(62,325 posts)known he was willing to put SS on the table. Fortunately the extremists on the Right refused his offer as they wanted even more for the wealthy. I know a lot of older people, life time Democrats, who were furious with him over that. They would not vote Republican, but I can see them staying home in disgust.
Dems better not even think of putting SS on the Deficit table, they need to remove it right now from any discussion of the Deficit. Or that will have a serious and devastating effect on the Dem Party.
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)SheilaT
(23,156 posts)I'm still working, part time. Next year I'll be on Medicare, sort of. I work for a company large enough that Medicare will be the second payer.
We seniors are not all alike, just as you young'uns are not all alike. I've been a Democrat my whole life, and the older I get, the more liberal I get. I have friends my age and a little older who are easily as left-wing as I am. Trust me, every time they say that Social Security or Medicare is safe for us old folks, I don't believe them.
scarletlib
(3,418 posts)I have gotten more liberal as I have grown older. I would never vote for a Republican under any circumstances at this point in my life. I am hoping that I live to see a female president and a Congress with 50% or more women, an end to our military adventurism, truly universal health care, work places that support humans rather than oppress them ,a living wage for everyone who works, free high quality education for all of our children, a truly green energy system and everyone working to offset global climate change.
Did I leave anything out?
Fumesucker
(45,851 posts)Or should they vote for the ones who turned down the offer?
These old people are easily confused and keeping track of the eleventy dimensional chess game is beyond a lot of them.
bowens43
(16,064 posts)Response to TheMastersNemesis (Original post)
HiPointDem This message was self-deleted by its author.
madokie
(51,076 posts)He's black and they can't be having a person of color being a President or, *if he steals his way in as Obama did, then they're all for doing whatever it takes to make him look bad. They cannot have a repeat of this other than old white man in the Oval Office.
*That is what many of the older generation I know think.
I'm an old mostly white male for the record.
dawnie51
(959 posts)and was lucky to be in a position to retire. I love PBO, voted for him twice, and am hoping he stands absolutely rigid on SS and Medicare. I got mine, after 30 years working for the VA, and I am grateful; but I have a daughter, and a son, and a son in law and two grandchildren. I want them to have the chance to retire too. No one should have to work until they drop dead. So if some wretched baby boomer offends you, remember, for everyone of these jerks you hear spouting Rethug talking points, there are many more of us out here who get it, and who want those who come after us to benefit too. How anyone who loves their children and their grandchildren, and the friends of those loved ones, can feel any other way is just an indication of stupidity.
GeorgeGist
(25,325 posts)cf. John McCain.
JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,375 posts)I'd guess that most seniors on DU (including me) likely voted for the Democratic candidate. Possibly even voted the straight Democratic ticket, thus saving the effort of punching many chads.
I could tell you that I'm over 65 and voted for Obama. This is true, but what's that got to do with the general population?
By limiting the impact of SS and medicare damage to younger (under 55?) people, Republicans assure that there's not a huge backlash among the more-white-haired seniors, who remember a day when Republicans were decent people. Ike wasn't all bad.
I know a few seniors who get full health benefits as part of retirement, or highly subsidized insurance like the military's TriCare, yet claim to desire smaller less-intrusive government. The irony floats by unnoticed.
retread
(3,764 posts)kydo
(2,679 posts)thats all thats left of the GOP old white males that are angry.
eridani
(51,907 posts)These are the people who will be screwed by cuts in SocSec and raising Medicare eligibility age.