Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

unhappycamper

(60,364 posts)
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 09:07 AM Nov 2012

Strange: Why Do Red States Have More Traffic Fatalities?

http://www.alternet.org/news-amp-politics/strange-why-do-red-states-have-more-traffic-fatalities


Strange: Why Do Red States Have More Traffic Fatalities?
November 20, 2012 |

When it comes to politics, conservative and liberal states are certainly on completely different tracks. But surprisingly, research shows they also part ways on a gloomy statistic: fatal traffic accidents.

Stuart Silverstein, a reporter for FairWarning, a nonprofit investigative news organization focused on public health and safety issues , reported Tuesday that traffic fatalities are more likely to occur in red states than blue states. Looking at 2010 federal statistics, Silverstein found that states with the highest rates of traffic deaths were overwhelmingly red states — calculated by those which voted Romney in the 2012 election. It’s estimated that U.S. traffic accidents killed more than 32,000 people in 2010.

Wyoming had the highest rate of deaths per 100,000 people at 27.46, while the District of Columbia had the lowest rate of deaths at 3.97. Although there are some outliers, Silverstein’s graph shows a clear partisan divide when it comes to traffic fatalities — which have safety experts perplexed.

Below is the chart:

58 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Strange: Why Do Red States Have More Traffic Fatalities? (Original Post) unhappycamper Nov 2012 OP
More traveling on poor farm to market roads? Are_grits_groceries Nov 2012 #1
Red states have to use cars more. Fawke Em Nov 2012 #2
California has heavy car usage and a very low fatality rate. trotsky Nov 2012 #17
That's because we're all in traffic, moving 10 mph. Marr Nov 2012 #27
You joke but I think that is part of the issue. Hassin Bin Sober Nov 2012 #38
Partly true, in my experience. dixiegrrrrl Nov 2012 #39
So are we subsidizing their auto insurance claims in addition to all the federal money they suck? randr Nov 2012 #3
No. You are supporting fellow Americans. Fawke Em Nov 2012 #6
Sad how they hate us, isn't it? cordelia Nov 2012 #29
I do recognize your efforts Fawke Em randr Nov 2012 #43
Insurance rates already are higher or lower depending upon where you live. PA Democrat Nov 2012 #44
Wonder how seat belt usage factors in? n/t Cairycat Nov 2012 #4
Seat belts are just another form of big brother BlueStreak Nov 2012 #28
I can tell you this, about my corner of Alabama. dixiegrrrrl Nov 2012 #40
UPdate to my earlier reply. add 2 more dead to Ala. score. dixiegrrrrl Nov 2012 #58
stinking driving laws aren't for Republicans 2pooped2pop Nov 2012 #5
Most of those Aerows Nov 2012 #7
"Red states" are generally less populated than Blue states MiniMe Nov 2012 #8
Without knowing miles driven, it's an utterly useless statistic. Robb Nov 2012 #9
+1 good point KurtNYC Nov 2012 #22
You win the thread - I was thinking the same GoneOffShore Nov 2012 #26
People in Red states rely on "faith based lane changes"? n/t Nevilledog Nov 2012 #10
More rural, poorer condition roads and vehicles, more impaired drivers. Hard to maintain control leveymg Nov 2012 #11
I'll agree with poorer condition roads and vehicles Aerows Nov 2012 #12
More cars, hence.. ananda Nov 2012 #13
Florida, Texas and California Aerows Nov 2012 #14
More shitty beer. HopeHoops Nov 2012 #15
Public Transportation in Large Cities Macoy51 Nov 2012 #16
"Riding on the Metro" - Berlin, circa 1982, "Pleasure Victim" album. HopeHoops Nov 2012 #18
Great Song, Sir The Magistrate Nov 2012 #46
Then there's the extended version of "SEX" (only on the CD, not vinyl) HopeHoops Nov 2012 #56
Thread title is misleading. Go Vols Nov 2012 #19
Those three states Aerows Nov 2012 #20
I would agree 100%. Go Vols Nov 2012 #21
If I were to guess. aandegoons Nov 2012 #23
Perhaps a dearth of EMTs due to budget cuts. Doremus Nov 2012 #24
I can think of a couple of reasons Glitterati Nov 2012 #25
Did you read to the end of the article? GoneOffShore Nov 2012 #30
Simple oswaldactedalone Nov 2012 #31
Two-lane non-divided highways with speeds of 60+ and TwilightGardener Nov 2012 #32
THIS... It would happen all the same in rural blue areas, if they existed. nt Thegonagle Nov 2012 #47
Just speaking for WV, we have the highest cost per mile of road and worst roads in the nation 1-Old-Man Nov 2012 #33
The standard one-mile rural/agricultural grid IDemo Nov 2012 #34
Texas just went up to 85 MPH on a stretch of highway... w8liftinglady Nov 2012 #35
Easy answer: LiberalEsto Nov 2012 #36
I was going to say "dumb rednecks drive like dumb rednecks" demhottie Nov 2012 #51
Speeding drunk at night on 2-lane highways and roads. FarCenter Nov 2012 #37
Substance abuse--especially booze and meth? Poorly maintained cars and rattle-trap clunkers? Surya Gayatri Nov 2012 #41
Because good ole boys billh58 Nov 2012 #42
Low population density, rural, no public transportation = more miles driven TransitJohn Nov 2012 #45
++ Also, most of those miles are at highway speeds, typically on shoulderless two-lane roads. Thegonagle Nov 2012 #48
This. nt redqueen Nov 2012 #49
speed kills. BlueMan Votes Nov 2012 #50
Speed limit too high? Too many potholes on roads maintained by the state? Cleita Nov 2012 #52
They also have higher rates of teen pregnancy, Doctor_J Nov 2012 #53
Less Likely to support Govt Laws to Control things like Speed Limit JI7 Nov 2012 #54
Speed? Renew Deal Nov 2012 #55
Anyone who has seen... liberalmuse Nov 2012 #57

Are_grits_groceries

(17,111 posts)
1. More traveling on poor farm to market roads?
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 09:13 AM
Nov 2012

Many of the roads where I grew up are in bad shape. They fill huge holes and that's about it. The side roads are even worse. They are barely strips of pavement. No thought was put into design.

I personally know 4 people who have died on those roads. Only one involved drinking.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
2. Red states have to use cars more.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 09:16 AM
Nov 2012

We have very little public transportation to speak of. Florida and Tennessee are extra special because of tourism (the Great Smoky Mountains National Park - mostly accessed in Tennessee - is the most visited national park in the country and it's only accessible by car and, of course, we know about Florida's tourism).

Hassin Bin Sober

(26,328 posts)
38. You joke but I think that is part of the issue.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 01:34 PM
Nov 2012

When I visit my SO's family in rural Illinois I always note how much driving is needed between point A to point B.

Not only the distance but the SPEED on those rural two lane highways is 55 (plus).

Lots of opportunities for head-on collision and serious single car accidents.

The SO pointed out to me all the places his family have run off the road over the years. His sister had a serious roll-over coming home from her late night nursing job. His mom put the car in the ditch on one of the 55mph roads a few years ago.

It seems we always hear of a car load of high school kids killed on rural roads. My SO lost HS friends that way. I honestly didn't remember any kids in my HS class killed in car accidents (urban/suburban HS). Around where I grew up, most speed limits are 25,30,35 and a few 45s.

To this day, I still refuse to take the "short cut" on the two lane un-divided highway to mom's house. Give me four divided lanes any day.

I would be curious to see the data broken down by county and rural versus urban/suburban.

I just spent a week on the road between Chicago and Phoenix. I was looking forward to the 75 mph highways outside Illinois. What I didn't anticipate was the fact the TRUCKS can also travel 75 (in Illinois most 65 mph routes restrict trucks to 55). I think that's too fast for trucks and it sucks competing for the passing lane with some truck swerving around in high winds.

Fawke Em

(11,366 posts)
6. No. You are supporting fellow Americans.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 09:44 AM
Nov 2012

Geez... some people on this board truly don't understand that there are liberals in red states.

cordelia

(2,174 posts)
29. Sad how they hate us, isn't it?
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 11:54 AM
Nov 2012

They don't even know us, but because we happen to live in a particular State they hate us.

How tragic to be filled with such bile.

randr

(12,412 posts)
43. I do recognize your efforts Fawke Em
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 03:07 PM
Nov 2012

I too live in a very conservative area, yet I still take every opportunity to shout out the the hypocrisy of the wingers around me who want to end government hand outs.
I feel absolutely the same in regard to my health insurance premiums covering tobacco smokers no matter their political persuasion.

 

BlueStreak

(8,377 posts)
28. Seat belts are just another form of big brother
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 11:46 AM
Nov 2012

Real patriots don't wear seat belts.

Another factor may be that the cars have more maintenance issues because the red states are generally lower income than blue states. So people probably drive older cars with balder tires and brakes that should have been fixed 10,000 miles ago, etc.

I realize these generalizations don't apply to everybody living in those states, but it doesn't take much of a delta to skew those statistics.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
40. I can tell you this, about my corner of Alabama.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 01:53 PM
Nov 2012

There are at least 3 "single car leaving roadway and/or roll over" accidents per week in my rural county.
and a fatality about every 6 weeks, no seat belts, driver thrown from vehicle.
I am not exaggerating.
We have miles and miles of unpatroled county roads in the whole state, and people SPEED.
From Friday night till early Monday morning, there are reports of cars leaving the roadway, almost always a single driver, almost always no seat belt.
The few times I drive out of town, on the country roads, I am tailgated constantly. I am NOT a slow pokey driver, either.
I live on a bluff, above a 2 lane road which leads into town, and can hear clearly the cars and motorcycles barreling up and down that road. Occasionally I hear the crash and rollover, and call the police to report it.
In town, speed limit 45 mph on the 4 lane, and people somehow manage to run into one another.
But the deaths are almost always when a speeding car leaves the road and finds the nearest immovable object to run into, ejecting the driver.

dixiegrrrrl

(60,010 posts)
58. UPdate to my earlier reply. add 2 more dead to Ala. score.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 07:58 PM
Nov 2012

Today's paper reports 2 men killed when the pickup they were in collided with a car, 6 miles from my house.
Both men ejected, no seat belts. Pic in paper shows pickup on side of road, upside down.
One of deceased man was a county firefighter and EMA volunteer. Yet did not wear seat belt..sheesh.

 

2pooped2pop

(5,420 posts)
5. stinking driving laws aren't for Republicans
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 09:44 AM
Nov 2012

"I don't got to use my turn signal, I'm a republican." Insert any law for turn signal. Like I don't have to come to a complete stop. I don't have to obey speed limits.

Drinking and driving laws are for the democrats only.

see? It's their roads. Laws are not for them. Stinking socialist roads anyway.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
7. Most of those
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 09:49 AM
Nov 2012

take place out in the sticks. I'm sure hitting deer and other animals is part of the problem, too. A wreck in the middle of nowhere is going to have a higher chance of being fatal because of the time necessary to get injured people medical attention. Wyoming is the second least densely populated state. It would make sense that people who have accidents there probably don't get medical attention as quickly as a very densely populated area.

That would also explain why Florida, with some of it's hideously dangerous highways has fewer fatalities than say, New Mexico. When there's a wreck in Florida, everyone in the world knows about it because there are so many people affected by it.

MiniMe

(21,716 posts)
8. "Red states" are generally less populated than Blue states
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 09:50 AM
Nov 2012

I wonder how much of that has to do with distance to the hospital or the distance from the closest help

GoneOffShore

(17,339 posts)
26. You win the thread - I was thinking the same
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 11:42 AM
Nov 2012

Because without factoring that in, plus distance to hospitals, emergency response time, availability of public transport and population density, this is just cherry picking numbers.

Kind of Rovian.

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
11. More rural, poorer condition roads and vehicles, more impaired drivers. Hard to maintain control
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 10:01 AM
Nov 2012

Last edited Wed Nov 21, 2012, 03:22 PM - Edit history (5)

of a '75 Chevy Half Ton Pickup at 90 mph on a dirt road while shooting at deer out the driver's window. That leaves the driver only one hand free to turn the AM radio nob to tune-in Rush, all the while trying to keep that 32 oz Bud Big Mouth from spilling on his own lap and the passenger's face.

I know, not funny. But, shit like this happens every day.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
12. I'll agree with poorer condition roads and vehicles
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 10:05 AM
Nov 2012

But to imply that they are all caused by impaired drivers is ridiculous. If you have a wreck in the middle of nowhere, how long do you think it is going to take for someone to find you and administer medical treatment? The highest of the states are sparsely populated ones. There are a lot of people living on the coast of Mississippi, but one or two miles north of I-10, a huge chunk of the state becomes the middle of nowhere.

Not to mention, plenty of those areas still have two lane highways that people travel on. A head-on collision on a two lane highway is usually pretty horrible.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
14. Florida, Texas and California
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 10:14 AM
Nov 2012

probably have more traffic daily than the rest of the country combined, and they aren't anywhere near the highest. I really think it is because when people have wrecks in those high traffic states, a) everyone knows about it because of the large number of people those wrecks affect, and b) medical attention is provided much more quickly. And please don't tell me about elderly drivers. The freaking early bird specials in Florida put everybody trying to get home from work in contention with all of the seniors flocking to Bob Evans. I used to hate that about St. Pete.

 

Macoy51

(239 posts)
16. Public Transportation in Large Cities
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 10:41 AM
Nov 2012

Greater amounts of public transportation in blue states (cities) plays a role in lowering the death rate. It is hard to get in a fatal car crash riding the subway.


Macoy

 

HopeHoops

(47,675 posts)
18. "Riding on the Metro" - Berlin, circa 1982, "Pleasure Victim" album.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 10:49 AM
Nov 2012

Yes, that's Terri Nunn. Her credits on the album are "Vocals, BJs".

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
20. Those three states
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 11:00 AM
Nov 2012

also probably have more traffic on their roads than the rest of the country combined.

 

Glitterati

(3,182 posts)
25. I can think of a couple of reasons
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 11:38 AM
Nov 2012

1. Young boys in rural counties are taught and allowed to drive farm vehicles as young as 8 or 9 and believe they can drive a vehicle just like they drive a tractor. I have a friend who never even stops for red lights unless he can see a cop who might pull him over.

2. Most male drivers have never had any formal driver's ed. Young girls usually have rudimentary driver's ed as part of high school, if their fathers approve. (Yeah, they're quite the misogynistic bunch!)

3. Wide open country roads which allow unhealthy speeds until they come around the curve and find that tree with a bunch of plastic flowers and homemade crosses attached to it, to honor the other 100 fatalities.

GoneOffShore

(17,339 posts)
30. Did you read to the end of the article?
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 11:59 AM
Nov 2012
Silverstein stated that some experts have critiqued the use of analyzing deaths per 100,000 people, suggesting deaths per total miles traveled may be more accurate.

Still, some insist the partisan divide is just coincidental, as too many factors are at play when it comes to traffic fatalities.

Anne McCartt, the senior vice president for research with the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety told Silverstein:

No matter how you look at fatal crash rates, there are some important things that explain why states are different, and they’re not political explanations.



The guy who made the chart (not you) obviously has a very partisan agenda that won't let truth get in his way. It's the kind of stuff that one expects from Hannity, Limbaugh or Beck.

1-Old-Man

(2,667 posts)
33. Just speaking for WV, we have the highest cost per mile of road and worst roads in the nation
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 12:04 PM
Nov 2012

Our cost to both build and maintain a mile of roadway is the highest in the nation, we have rugged topography and a low population (taxpayer) base which means hard roads to build and nobody to pay for them. Add to that poorly maintained and old cars, which is exactly what you'd expect from a generally poor population, and sprinkle that with a massive dose of ignorance and pretty soon you start stacking up dead people.

IDemo

(16,926 posts)
34. The standard one-mile rural/agricultural grid
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 12:05 PM
Nov 2012

Running stop signs out in the country at night-time is fairly normal behavior by some, with expected results.

w8liftinglady

(23,278 posts)
35. Texas just went up to 85 MPH on a stretch of highway...
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 12:11 PM
Nov 2012

Texans assume that is the speed limit on all roads.
Just about every fatality is speed or alcohol related.

demhottie

(292 posts)
51. I was going to say "dumb rednecks drive like dumb rednecks"
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 05:49 PM
Nov 2012


but I though it was too harsh. Thanks for beating me to it ...
 

FarCenter

(19,429 posts)
37. Speeding drunk at night on 2-lane highways and roads.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 01:17 PM
Nov 2012

Also colliding with deer and livestock, roads without guard rails, more SUVs and pickups with high center of gravity...

 

Surya Gayatri

(15,445 posts)
41. Substance abuse--especially booze and meth? Poorly maintained cars and rattle-trap clunkers?
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 02:53 PM
Nov 2012

Lower collective population IQ? Substandard Drivers' Ed progams--poorly financed and badly taught?

Thegonagle

(806 posts)
48. ++ Also, most of those miles are at highway speeds, typically on shoulderless two-lane roads.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 05:17 PM
Nov 2012

Between crashing at 40 MPH and 70 MPH, fatalities go from "almost never" to "more often than not," even if wearing a seatbelt.

Between average speeds in rural vs. metro areas, and crashes typically happening farther away from life-saving help, that pretty well covers the deficit.

It's really not a political issue at all.

 

BlueMan Votes

(903 posts)
50. speed kills.
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 05:46 PM
Nov 2012

There aren't too many places in DC to get a good head of steam going...there's something to be said for gridlock, i guess.

Cleita

(75,480 posts)
52. Speed limit too high? Too many potholes on roads maintained by the state?
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 05:52 PM
Nov 2012

In California, some years ago, they lowered the speed limit to 55 mph. Although, they raised it back to 65 because of complaints, it seems that traffic accidents went down during the time of the lower speed limits. Just a thought.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
53. They also have higher rates of teen pregnancy,
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 05:59 PM
Nov 2012

unwed mothers, violent crime, and so on. The fact is that the quality of life is better in the blue states. Which is why secession is not a horrible idea.

JI7

(89,249 posts)
54. Less Likely to support Govt Laws to Control things like Speed Limit
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 06:03 PM
Nov 2012

support for better roads and lights and other things which could help prevent accidents.

any info on how many of these accidents are a result of alcohol ?

Renew Deal

(81,859 posts)
55. Speed?
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 06:06 PM
Nov 2012

Blue states are more densely populated and people have to deal with more traffic. Speed is said to be a factor in accidents. You can't go that fast when stuck in traffic.

I'd be curious to match these statistics with seat belt ticket statistics, crime rates, teen birth rates, etc. The cause could be a difference in lifestyle too.

liberalmuse

(18,672 posts)
57. Anyone who has seen...
Wed Nov 21, 2012, 06:21 PM
Nov 2012

how someone with a Christian Fish sticker or Republican bumpersticker drives will understand how this is possible. Some people drive exactly how they vote - with their heads clean up their arses.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Strange: Why Do Red State...