Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(95,553 posts)
Tue Feb 27, 2024, 08:05 PM Feb 2024

Steve Kornacki: Why Trump wins independents in polls while struggling with them in primaries

Donald Trump is winning his primaries handily and has a virtual lock on the Republican presidential nomination — but a common interpretation of the results says that he is also exhibiting profound weaknesses among independents that portend dire general election consequences.

But there’s a hitch. A look at general election polling reveals a completely different story among independent voters — and a dive into all the other data we have on the 2024 presidential race shows why Trump’s poor independent numbers in the primary and better performance in general election polls are completely consistent with each other. The short answer: These are two very different groups of voters.

First, the evidence for Trump’s weakness among independents voting in this year’s GOP primaries is straightforward. Despite the widely acknowledged — even by his critics — inevitability of his nomination, Trump is still losing around 40% of the vote in Republican contests. And he’s getting crushed among independents, a group that looms large in November. From exit polling data, here’s how bad Trump’s numbers have been with them so far (note that exit polls weren’t conducted in Michigan):

...snip...

For context, Trump lost the independent vote to President Joe Biden in 2020 by a 9-point margin, 52%-43%, per the NBC News national exit poll. So the current general election polling actually indicates slight improvement for Trump (and a decline for Biden) among independents, albeit with a significant number indicating they don’t want either candidate.

https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2024-election/steve-kornacki-trump-wins-independents-polls-struggling-primaries-rcna140740
18 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Steve Kornacki: Why Trump wins independents in polls while struggling with them in primaries (Original Post) brooklynite Feb 2024 OP
Yep, the primaries and the GE are two very different things. TwilightZone Feb 2024 #1
There's always a correlation. Some stronger than others. There are even negative correlations. mobeau69 Feb 2024 #2
Nope. TwilightZone Feb 2024 #10
The writer of the snip you attached is using the term "correlation" as it's commonly understood by non-scientists. The mobeau69 Feb 2024 #17
Correction gab13by13 Feb 2024 #3
Did you mis-read the title? brooklynite Feb 2024 #5
The problem comparing polling data of independents to exit polls... All Mixed Up Feb 2024 #4
Please stop it.................................. Lovie777 Feb 2024 #6
Stop what? brooklynite Feb 2024 #7
Stalking other users... TwilightZone Feb 2024 #13
LOL - Kornacki FHRRK Feb 2024 #8
OR (just spitballing) a data analyst who goes where the story is. brooklynite Feb 2024 #9
Lol, does HS level analysis and some think he is a genius FHRRK Feb 2024 #11
Those would be the corporate masters who keep Rachel Maddow, Nicole Wallace etc on the air? brooklynite Feb 2024 #15
ROFLMAO FHRRK Feb 2024 #16
MSNBC talking about the number of Haley voters who won't vote for Trump brooklynite Feb 2024 #18
He's not supposed to be partisan. TwilightZone Feb 2024 #12
I'm not mistaken FHRRK Feb 2024 #14

TwilightZone

(25,673 posts)
1. Yep, the primaries and the GE are two very different things.
Tue Feb 27, 2024, 08:16 PM
Feb 2024

Despite the myriad attempts to fabricate one, there is no correlation between the two.

TwilightZone

(25,673 posts)
10. Nope.
Tue Feb 27, 2024, 08:56 PM
Feb 2024

There is zero correlation. The groups of people who vote in primaries are completely different from the people who show up in November. It's simply a myth that will not die.

There actually is no historic correlation between primary turnout and general election turnout. None. The highest turnout in a Democratic primary—before the outlier of 2008—was in 1988. Gov. Michael Dukakis got killed in November. Democratic primary turnout was actually lower in 1992—two million fewer Democrats voted in the primaries that year. The drop in turnout didn’t stop Bill Clinton from winning the general election convincingly.


https://thehill.com/blogs/congress-blog/presidential-campaign/272381-the-truth-about-primary-voter-turnout/

mobeau69

(11,194 posts)
17. The writer of the snip you attached is using the term "correlation" as it's commonly understood by non-scientists. The
Tue Feb 27, 2024, 09:19 PM
Feb 2024

use of the phrase “no correlation” is intended to indicate a very, very weak correlation. Ex: -.0000000001 - +.000000001.

brooklynite

(95,553 posts)
5. Did you mis-read the title?
Tue Feb 27, 2024, 08:35 PM
Feb 2024
Why Trump wins independents in polls while struggling with them in primaries
 

All Mixed Up

(597 posts)
4. The problem comparing polling data of independents to exit polls...
Tue Feb 27, 2024, 08:33 PM
Feb 2024

...especially this far out is:

1. These recent polls (and NBC is using a poll from nearly a month ago, so, it's pretty outdated) are of registered voters - not likely voters. That absolutely can impact the overall data as we know for certain exit polls are of those who voted, not just registered voters.

2. Political affiliation in polling generally has a much larger MOE than the overall poll itself because you're dealing with a much smaller sample size. It's also more volatile to changes. But to hit on the first point: Trump is doing two-points better than he did in 2020's exit polls. When you factor in MOE, it's basically a wash if he's actually doing better overall. On top of that, Biden's numbers are much lower but that could be because undecideds have yet to move to him yet (which would be higher in a poll of registered voters and not likely). The common theme with polls is that Trump is hitting his 2020 mark but he's rarely exceeding it. Of those undecided, how many are leaning Biden?

To the second point: these numbers are volatile. I looked at NBC's last poll from 2020 but it didn't break down political affiliation. But I did go off a FOX News poll which had Biden leading by a similar final margin over Trump as the NBC poll and they had Biden winning the independent vote 54-32 - or by 22 points. The MOE for just that political affiliation as +/- 9 points, so, pretty unreliable. In reality, Biden won that group 52-43. So, they were almost ten-points off.

To me, this is just finding content to find content. There's nothing substantiative to take away from one poll that has Trump up among independent voters.

And it is just one poll.

In the Quinnipiac poll released last week, Biden wins indies 44-42.

So, who to believe?

brooklynite

(95,553 posts)
9. OR (just spitballing) a data analyst who goes where the story is.
Tue Feb 27, 2024, 08:54 PM
Feb 2024

I must admit to some fascination at how much angst he generates in these parts.

FHRRK

(620 posts)
11. Lol, does HS level analysis and some think he is a genius
Tue Feb 27, 2024, 08:57 PM
Feb 2024

As he tries to spin shit for his Corporate Masters. A truly worthless piece of shit that has found a gig being a break from the talking heads.

And it least from my perspective - you are confusing angst with utter disdain. I can perform basic math, don't need some suck up to spin it.

FHRRK

(620 posts)
16. ROFLMAO
Tue Feb 27, 2024, 09:06 PM
Feb 2024

Nicole worked her entire career for Repubs, as did almost all of the hosts prior to her time slot.

Phil Donahue, K.O., how about them.

Lol give it up, and wasting my time.

brooklynite

(95,553 posts)
18. MSNBC talking about the number of Haley voters who won't vote for Trump
Tue Feb 27, 2024, 09:31 PM
Feb 2024

Damn those Corporate Masters!!!

TwilightZone

(25,673 posts)
12. He's not supposed to be partisan.
Tue Feb 27, 2024, 08:59 PM
Feb 2024

If you thought otherwise, you were mistaken.

The intense hatred of Kornacki is actually kind of hilarious. We constantly bash the right for refusing to acknowledge reality, then we bash Kornacki for reporting facts based on actual data.

Sometimes, the real world doesn't match up with our expectations. Or our demands.

This place just makes me laugh sometimes.

Latest Discussions»General Discussion»Steve Kornacki: Why Trump...