Welcome to DU!
The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards.
Join the community:
Create a free account
Support DU (and get rid of ads!):
Become a Star Member
Latest Breaking News
General Discussion
The DU Lounge
All Forums
Issue Forums
Culture Forums
Alliance Forums
Region Forums
Support Forums
Help & Search
General Discussion
Related: Editorials & Other Articles, Issue Forums, Alliance Forums, Region Forums🚨 SB 4 is back on hold. 5th Circuit dissolves stay on Preliminary Injunction
Link to tweet
Chris Law Dork Geidner
@chrisgeidner
·
Follow
BREAKING UPDATE: SB4 is, yet again, on hold, by a 2-1 order of the Fifth Circuit panel hearing Wednesday's oral arguments. Oldham dissents. Background: https://lawdork.com/p/scotus-texas-sb4-immigration-law-shadow-docket
Image
Chris Law Dork Geidner
@chrisgeidner
UPDATE: SCOTUS issues Texas SB4 order, Fifth Circuit goes Zoom. https://lawdork.com/p/scotus-texas-sb4-immigration-law-shadow-docket
[Update, 6:30 p.m.: Following the Supreme Courts Tuesday order in the S.B. 4 litigation, the Fifth Circuit announced that it would be holding a Zoom argument on Texass motion for a stay pending appeal at 10 a.m. CT Wednesday, March 20.
Although its a positive sign that the appeals court does appear to have seen Barretts message, the likely result here is that the merits panel considers the motion and ends the administrative stay by granting or denying the request for a stay pending appeal, which then leads the losing party right back to the Supreme Court asking for relief on the shadow docket.
According to the cases docket, the panel hearing the arguments on Wednesday will be Chief Judge Priscilla Richman, a George W. Bush appointee; Andy Oldham, a Trump appointee; and Irma Ramirez, a Biden appointee.]
InfoView thread info, including edit history
TrashPut this thread in your Trash Can (My DU » Trash Can)
BookmarkAdd this thread to your Bookmarks (My DU » Bookmarks)
7 replies, 704 views
ShareGet links to this post and/or share on social media
AlertAlert this post for a rule violation
PowersThere are no powers you can use on this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
ReplyReply to this post
EditCannot edit other people's posts
Rec (5)
ReplyReply to this post
7 replies
= new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight:
NoneDon't highlight anything
5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
🚨 SB 4 is back on hold. 5th Circuit dissolves stay on Preliminary Injunction (Original Post)
Nevilledog
Mar 19
OP
Appeals court blocks Texas immigration law shortly after Supreme Court action
LetMyPeopleVote
Mar 20
#7
Nevilledog
(51,116 posts)1. SB4 Timeline
Link to tweet
Steve Vladeck
@steve_vladeck
·
Follow
#SB4 Timeline:
Before 4:00 CT yesterday: Not in effect.
From 4:00 to 4:04: In effect.
From 4:04 yesterday to 1:05 today: Not in effect.
From 1:05 today to 9:44 tonight: In effect.
Currently: Not in effect.
This is *no* way to run a railroad.
8:14 PM · Mar 19, 2024
highplainsdem
(48,997 posts)2. Beat me to it. I was going to post Steve Vladek's thread:
Nevilledog
(51,116 posts)3. It's procedurally convoluted so I was glad he did the simple timeline
Matthew28
(1,798 posts)4. how does a circuit court
stop a order from the supreme court?
Nevilledog
(51,116 posts)5. There has been no decision on the merits of the law at the 5th Circuit
Here's more of the procedural history from Chris Geidner:
Texasgal
(17,045 posts)6. This whole thing is a joke!
Abbott is a moron! Our cities do not care, and we do not have the manpower to enforce this ridiculous bullshit!
LetMyPeopleVote
(145,293 posts)7. Appeals court blocks Texas immigration law shortly after Supreme Court action
The decision comes just hours after the Supreme Court said the measure, known as SB4, could go into effect while litigation continues.
Link to tweet
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/immigration/appeals-court-blocks-texas-immigration-law-supreme-court-action-rcna144193
A federal appeals court on Tuesday night ordered that a contentious new Texas immigration law be paused just hours after the Supreme Court said it could go into effect.
A three-judge panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals split 2-1 in saying in a brief order that the measure, known as SB4, should be blocked. The same court is hearing arguments Wednesday morning on the issue.....
The appeals court appeared to be taking the hint from the Supreme Court, which in rejecting an emergency application filed by the Biden administration put the onus on the appeals court to act quickly.
"If a decision does not issue soon, the applicants may return to this court, conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote in a separate opinion joined by fellow conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh.
A three-judge panel of the New Orleans-based 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals split 2-1 in saying in a brief order that the measure, known as SB4, should be blocked. The same court is hearing arguments Wednesday morning on the issue.....
The appeals court appeared to be taking the hint from the Supreme Court, which in rejecting an emergency application filed by the Biden administration put the onus on the appeals court to act quickly.
"If a decision does not issue soon, the applicants may return to this court, conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett wrote in a separate opinion joined by fellow conservative Justice Brett Kavanaugh.